Literature DB >> 17057595

Communication between physicians and nurses as a target for improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for moving forward.

Kathleen A Puntillo1, Jennifer L McAdam.   

Abstract

Our objective was to discuss obstacles and barriers to effective communication and collaboration regarding end-of-life issues between intensive care unit nurses and physicians. To evaluate practical interventions for improving communication and collaboration, we undertook a systematic literature review. An increase in shared decision making can result from a better understanding and respect for the perspectives and burdens felt by other caregivers. Intensive care unit nurses value their contributions to end-of-life decision making and want to have a more active role. Increased collaboration and communication can result in more appropriate care and increased physician/nurse, patient, and family satisfaction. Recommendations for improvement in communication between intensive care unit physicians and nurses include use of joint grand rounds, patient care seminars, and interprofessional dialogues. Communication interventions such as use of daily rounds forms, communication training, and a collaborative practice model have shown positive results. When communication is clear and constructive and practice is truly collaborative, the end-of-life care provided to intensive care unit patients and families by satisfied and engaged professionals will improve markedly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17057595     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237047.31376.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  38 in total

1.  Organizational considerations for the implementation of a computerized physician order entry.

Authors:  Sylvia Pelayo; Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zephir
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

2.  Quality of End-of-Life Care and Its Association with Nurse Practice Environments in U.S. Hospitals.

Authors:  Karen B Lasater; Douglas M Sloane; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  [Clinical everyday ethics-support in handling moral distress? : Evaluation of an ethical decision-making model for interprofessional clinical teams].

Authors:  S Tanner; H Albisser Schleger; B Meyer-Zehnder; V Schnurrer; S Reiter-Theil; H Pargger
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Nursing strategies to support family members of ICU patients at high risk of dying.

Authors:  Judith A Adams; Ruth A Anderson; Sharron L Docherty; James A Tulsky; Karen E Steinhauser; Donald E Bailey
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gingell Epstein; Ann Baile Hamric
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2009

6.  Understanding nurse-physician conflicts in the ICU.

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Julie Benbenishty
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Is Shared Decision Making a Utopian Dream or an Achievable Goal?

Authors:  Louisa Blair; France Légaré
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  A randomized trial comparing didactics, demonstration, and simulation for teaching teamwork to medical residents.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Raj D Keriwala; Jennifer K Clune; Todd W Rice; Meredith E Pugh; Arthur P Wheeler; Alison N Miller; Arna Banerjee; Kyla Terhune; Julie A Bastarache
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-04

9.  Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals on the Usage of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in a Teaching Hospital from a Middle-Income South East Asian Country.

Authors:  M H Jaafar; S Mahadeva; P Subramanian; M P Tan
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Challenges in end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit: an ethical perspective.

Authors:  Hanne Irene Jensen; Jette Ammentorp; Helle Johannessen; Helle Ørding
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 1.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.