Literature DB >> 20959579

Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality.

Julia Neily1, Peter D Mills, Yinong Young-Xu, Brian T Carney, Priscilla West, David H Berger, Lisa M Mazzia, Douglas E Paull, James P Bagian.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: There is insufficient information about the effectiveness of medical team training on surgical outcomes. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a formalized medical team training program for operating room personnel on a national level.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association existed between the VHA Medical Team Training program and surgical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective health services study with a contemporaneous control group was conducted. Outcome data were obtained from the VHA Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and from structured interviews in fiscal years 2006 to 2008. The analysis included 182,409 sampled procedures from 108 VHA facilities that provided care to veterans. The VHA's nationwide training program required briefings and debriefings in the operating room and included checklists as an integral part of this process. The training included 2 months of preparation, a 1-day conference, and 1 year of quarterly coaching interviews MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of change in the mortality rate 1 year after facilities enrolled in the training program compared with the year before and with nontraining sites.
RESULTS: The 74 facilities in the training program experienced an 18% reduction in annual mortality (rate ratio [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91; P = .01) compared with a 7% decrease among the 34 facilities that had not yet undergone training (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80-1.06; P = .59). The risk-adjusted mortality rates at baseline were 17 per 1000 procedures per year for the trained facilities and 15 per 1000 procedures per year for the nontrained facilities. At the end of the study, the rates were 14 per 1000 procedures per year for both groups. Propensity matching of the trained and nontrained groups demonstrated that the decline in the risk-adjusted surgical mortality rate was about 50% greater in the training group (RR,1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.07; P = .01) than in the nontraining group. A dose-response relationship for additional quarters of the training program was also demonstrated: for every quarter of the training program, a reduction of 0.5 deaths per 1000 procedures occurred (95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Participation in the VHA Medical Team Training program was associated with lower surgical mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20959579     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  174 in total

1.  Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study.

Authors:  Alisa Khan; Nancy D Spector; Jennifer D Baird; Michele Ashland; Amy J Starmer; Glenn Rosenbluth; Briana M Garcia; Katherine P Litterer; Jayne E Rogers; Anuj K Dalal; Stuart Lipsitz; Catherine S Yoon; Katherine R Zigmont; Amy Guiot; Jennifer K O'Toole; Aarti Patel; Zia Bismilla; Maitreya Coffey; Kate Langrish; Rebecca L Blankenburg; Lauren A Destino; Jennifer L Everhart; Brian P Good; Irene Kocolas; Rajendu Srivastava; Sharon Calaman; Sharon Cray; Nicholas Kuzma; Kheyandra Lewis; E Douglas Thompson; Jennifer H Hepps; Joseph O Lopreiato; Clifton E Yu; Helen Haskell; Elizabeth Kruvand; Dale A Micalizzi; Wilma Alvarado-Little; Benard P Dreyer; H Shonna Yin; Anupama Subramony; Shilpa J Patel; Theodore C Sectish; Daniel C West; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 2.  Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Rebecca A Schroeder; Atilio Barbeito; Dawn Rogers; Deirdre K Thornlow; James Emery; Sally Kellum; Melanie C Wright; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Bringing Specialties Together: The Power of Intra-Professional Teams.

Authors:  Tasce Bongiovanni; Theodore Long; Ali M Khan; Mark D Siegel
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-03

4.  Trust and Reflection in Primary Care Practice Redesign.

Authors:  Holly Jordan Lanham; Raymond F Palmer; Luci K Leykum; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Carlos Roberto Jaén
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Richard E Nelson; Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Junji Lin; Scott L DuVall; Olga Patterson; James Tsai; Nimia Reyes
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Wrong site surgery-where are we and what is the next step?

Authors:  Tyson K Cobb
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-06

7.  Re-validating the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery tool (OTAS-D): cultural adaptation, refinement, and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Stefanie Passauer-Baierl; Louise Hull; Danilo Miskovic; Stephanie Russ; Nick Sevdalis; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The Surgical Safety Checklist: Results of Implementation in Otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  Ali S Al-Qahtani
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-01

9.  [Human factors and crisis resource management: improving patient safety].

Authors:  M Rall; S Oberfrank
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  The implementation of a team training intervention for school mental health: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Rebecca E Stewart; Ricardo Eiraldi; Peter Cronholm; Eduardo Salas; David S Mandell
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2018-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.