Literature DB >> 25729464

MODELING TIME DISPERSION DUE TO OPTICAL PATH LENGTH DIFFERENCES IN SCINTILLATION DETECTORS.

W W Moses1, W-S Choong1, S E Derenzo1.   

Abstract

We characterize the nature of the time dispersion in scintillation detectors caused by path length differences of the scintillation photons as they travel from their generation point to the photodetector. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we find that the initial portion of the distribution (which is the only portion that affects the timing resolution) can usually be modeled by an exponential decay. The peak amplitude and decay time depend both on the geometry of the crystal, the position within the crystal that the scintillation light originates from, and the surface finish. In a rectangular parallelpiped LSO crystal with 3 mm × 3 mm cross section and polished surfaces, the decay time ranges from 10 ps (for interactions 1 mm from the photodetector) up to 80 ps (for interactions 50 mm from the photodetector). Over that same range of distances, the peak amplitude ranges from 100% (defined as the peak amplitude for interactions 1 mm from the photodetector) down to 4% for interactions 50 mm from the photodetector. Higher values for the decay time are obtained for rough surfaces, but the exact value depends on the simulation details. Estimates for the decay time and peak amplitude can be made for different cross section sizes via simple scaling arguments.

Year:  2014        PMID: 25729464      PMCID: PMC4341908          DOI: 10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.7.725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Phys Pol B Proc Suppl        ISSN: 1899-2358


  5 in total

1.  The lower bound on the timing resolution of scintillation detectors.

Authors:  Stefan Seifert; Herman T van Dam; Dennis R Schaart
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Optimization of a LSO-Based Detector Module for Time-of-Flight PET.

Authors:  W W Moses; M Janecek; M A Spurrier; P Szupryczynski; W-S Choong; C L Melcher; M Andreaco
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  The timing resolution of scintillation-detector systems: Monte Carlo analysis.

Authors:  Woon-Seng Choong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Fundamental limits of scintillation detector timing precision.

Authors:  Stephen E Derenzo; Woon-Seng Choong; William W Moses
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight PET with double-ended readout: calibration, coincidence resolving times and statistical lower bounds.

Authors:  Stephen E Derenzo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Modelling the transport of optical photons in scintillation detectors for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Monte Carlo calculations of PET coincidence timing: single and double-ended readout.

Authors:  Stephen E Derenzo; Woon-Seng Choong; William W Moses
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.