Literature DB >> 21738262

Optimization of a LSO-Based Detector Module for Time-of-Flight PET.

W W Moses1, M Janecek, M A Spurrier, P Szupryczynski, W-S Choong, C L Melcher, M Andreaco.   

Abstract

We have explored methods for optimizing the timing resolution of an LSO-based detector module for a single-ring, "demonstration" time-of-flight PET camera. By maximizing the area that couples the scintillator to the PMT and minimizing the average path length that the scintillation photons travel, a single detector timing resolution of 218 ps fwhm is measured, which is considerably better than the ~385 ps fwhm obtained by commercial LSO or LYSO TOF detector modules. We explored different surface treatments (saw-cut, mechanically polished, and chemically etched) and reflector materials (Teflon tape, ESR, Lumirror, Melinex, white epoxy, and white paint), and found that for our geometry, a chemically etched surface had 5% better timing resolution than the saw-cut or mechanically polished surfaces, and while there was little dependence on the timing resolution between the various reflectors, white paint and white epoxy were a few percent better. Adding co-dopants to LSO shortened the decay time from 40 ns to ~30 ns but maintained the same or higher total light output. This increased the initial photoelectron rate and so improved the timing resolution by 15%. Using photomultiplier tubes with higher quantum efficiency (blue sensitivity index of 13.5 rather than 12) improved the timing resolution by an additional 5%. By choosing the optimum surface treatment (chemically etched), reflector (white paint), LSO composition (co-doped), and PMT (13.5 blue sensitivity index), the coincidence timing resolution of our detector module was reduced from 309 ps to 220 ps fwhm.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21738262      PMCID: PMC3129785          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2010.2047266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  5 in total

1.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti; Bernard Bendriem; Mike Casey; Mu Chen; Frank Kehren; Christian Michel; Vladimir Panin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET.

Authors:  William W Moses
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 3.  Time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  T K Lewellen
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin Kuhn; Matthew E Werner; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey Kolthammer; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total
  12 in total

1.  Detection performance analysis for time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Nannan Cao; Ronald H Huesman; William W Moses; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Side readout of long scintillation crystal elements with digital SiPM for TOF-DOI PET.

Authors:  Jung Yeol Yeom; Ruud Vinke; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  MODELING TIME DISPERSION DUE TO OPTICAL PATH LENGTH DIFFERENCES IN SCINTILLATION DETECTORS.

Authors:  W W Moses; W-S Choong; S E Derenzo
Journal:  Acta Phys Pol B Proc Suppl       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 4.  Instrumentation for Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Muhammad Nasir Ullah; Eva Pratiwi; Jimin Cheon; Hojong Choi; Jung Yeol Yeom
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-22

5.  Lesion detection and quantification performance of the Tachyon-I time-of-flight PET scanner: phantom and human studies.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Qiyu Peng; Jian Zhou; Jennifer S Huber; William W Moses; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  OpenPET: A Flexible Electronics System for Radiotracer Imaging.

Authors:  W W Moses; S Buckley; C Vu; Q Peng; N Pavlov; W-S Choong; J Wu; C Jackson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Evaluation of the Timing Properties of a High Quantum Efficiency Photomultiplier Tube.

Authors:  Qiyu Peng; Woon-Seng Choong; W William Moses
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  High-performance electronics for time-of-flight PET systems.

Authors:  W-S Choong; Q Peng; C Q Vu; B T Turko; W W Moses
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.415

9.  Cerenkov light transport in scintillation crystals explained: realistic simulation with GATE.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Sun Il Kwon; Sebastien Jan; Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-04-17

10.  Conceptual design and simulation study of an ROI-focused panel-PET scanner.

Authors:  Qingguo Xie; Lu Wan; Xiaoqing Cao; Peng Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.