| Literature DB >> 25728624 |
Zheng-miao Deng1, Xin-sheng Chen1, Yong-hong Xie1, Ya-jun Xie1, Zhi-yong Hou1, Feng Li1.
Abstract
Seedlings and vegetative ramets may contribute differentially to the recruitment of clonal populations in different growth phases, but this has rarely been investigated. In this study, we quantified the number and survivorship of seedlings and vegetative ramets monthly in juvenile and mature populations of Carex brevicuspis. During the first growing season after flooding (from October to January), 9 seedlings m(-2) (13% of all established shoots) were found in juvenile populations, while no seedlings were found in mature populations. During the second growing season before flooding (from February to May), no new seedling recruits were found either in juvenile or in mature populations. All shoots of seedlings were withered during the dormant season (January and February), but 62.5% seedlings could produce vegetative ramets in the following growing season. During the dormant season, all the early emerging ramets (sprouted in October) withered, but the later emerging ones (sprouted in November and December) survived in both mature and juvenile populations. These results indicated that seedling recruitment was only apparent in juvenile populations of C. brevicuspis. The genetic diversity in mature C. brevicuspis populations may be established in juvenile populations by seedling recruitment, and sustained in mature populations by vegetative reproduction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25728624 PMCID: PMC5155402 DOI: 10.1038/srep08646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Accompanying species composition in juvenile and mature populations of Carex brevicuspis (means ± s.e.). Different letters indicate the density differences between early and late successional stage at the 0.05 significance level
| Species | Density (no./m2) | Life form | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juvenile population ( | Mature population ( | ||
| 108.0 ± 19.4 b | 2472.0 ± 287.3 a | Perennial | |
| 9.3 ± 1.3 | - | Biennial | |
| 8.0 ± 2.3 | - | Annual | |
| 52.2 ± 4.4 | - | Annual/biennial | |
| 14.6 ± 1.3 | - | Annual | |
| 36.6 ± 26.3 | - | Annual | |
| 8.2 ± 3.2 | - | Annual | |
| 44.5 ± 11.3 | - | Annual | |
| 69.7 ± 19.3 | - | Annual | |
| 56.2 ± 2.3 | - | Perennial | |
| 11.3 ± 1.2 | - | Annual | |
| 35.2 ± 16.1 | - | Annual | |
| 9.3 ± 0.9 b | 26.7 ± 4.6 a | Annual/biennial | |
| 8.0 ± 1.6 | - | Perennial | |
| - | 104.0 ± 24.0 | Annual | |
| - | 56.0 ± 10.3 | Perennial | |
| Diversity Index | 1.692 ± 0.07 a | 0.235 ± 0.09 b | |
Figure 1The ramet and seedling number dynamics in juvenile (a) and mature populations (b).
* represents a significant difference at the 0.05 level between ramet and seedling numbers in each growing season, independent t test.
Summary of repeated measures ANOVAs on ramet density, seedling density and new recruits of ramets and seedlings in C. brevicuspis populations. (F values and P values)
| Dependent viarable | Stage (S) | Time (T) | S*T | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | F | |||||||
| Ramet density | 183.16 | 0.000 | 53.38 | 0.000 | 34.64 | 0.000 | |||
| Seedling density | - | 14.14 | 0.000 | - | |||||
| New recruits (ramets) | 298.95 | 0.000 | 52.55 | 0.000 | 44.62 | 0.000 | |||
| New recruits (seedlings) | - | 10.6 | 0.000 | - | |||||
| d.f. | 1 | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Figure 2The ramet and seedling new recruit dynamics in juvenile (a) and mature populations (b).
* represents a significant difference at the 0.05 level between ramet and seedling numbers in each growing season, independent t test.
Figure 3The survival patterns in seedling populations (a) and ramet populations in juvenile (b) and mature populations (c).
* represents a significant difference at the 0.05 level between seedlings or ramets with different emerging times. One-way ANOVA.