| Literature DB >> 26228352 |
Xin-sheng Chen1, Ya-fang Li2, Yong-hong Xie1, Zheng-miao Deng1, Xu Li1, Feng Li1, Zhi-yong Hou1.
Abstract
The trade-off between allocation to sexual and clonal reproduction in clonal plants is influenced by a variety of environmental factors; however, it has rarely been examined under field conditions. In this study, we investigated the trade-off between two modes of reproduction in Carex brevicuspis C. B. Clarke across a small-scale elevational gradient (21-27 m a.s.l.) at the Dongting Lake wetlands, China. The proportion of biomass allocated to and the density of reproductive ramets were higher at low than at intermediate and high elevations. In contrast, the proportion of biomass allocated to and the density of rhizome buds were lower at low than at intermediate and high elevations. Redundancy analysis showed that sexual reproduction was positively correlated with soil moisture content, soil organic matter, total phosphorus, and pH, and negatively correlated with elevation and ramet density. Our findings suggested that allocation to sexual reproduction is favored in disturbed habitats with fertile soils, whereas allocation to vegetative propagation is favored in stable and competitive habitats. Trade-off between allocation to sexual reproduction and vegetative propagation along an elevational gradient might be a reproductive strategy of C. brevicuspis to adapt to the water level fluctuations in wetland habitats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26228352 PMCID: PMC4521143 DOI: 10.1038/srep12688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Linear mixed model analysis (F-values) of ramet and bud densities, total biomass, and biomass allocation.
| Variable | Elevation (E) | Sampling period (S) | E × S |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ramet density | 11.06*** | 25.35*** | 12.39*** |
| Bud density | 20.07*** | 24.61*** | 10.49*** |
| Total biomass | 17.66*** | 2.11ns | 1.71ns |
| Shoot mass fraction | 15.30*** | 53.92*** | 4.57** |
| Root mass fraction | 10.41*** | 52.94*** | 5.00*** |
| d.f. | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Elevation and sampling period were included as fixed factors, and site was included as a random factor.
***P < 0.001, P < 0.01, *P < 0.05; nsP > 0.05.
Figure 1Plant biomass
(A), shoot mass fraction (B), and root mass fraction (C) at three elevations at the four sampling time points. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE. *P < 0.05.
Soil characteristics at each elevation in the study area in three sampling periods.
| Sampling period | Elevation category | SM (%) | SBD (g·cm−3) | SOM (%) | TN (%) | TP (%) | TK (%) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013.11 | Low | 0.66 ± 0.04a | 0.70 ± 0.03b | 5.05 ± 0.27a | 0.24 ± 0.01a | 0.09 ± 0.00a | 0.18 ± 0.00a | 7.50 ± 0.12a |
| Intermediate | 0.61 ± 0.01ab | 0.85 ± 0.02a | 4.41 ± 0.18a | 0.21 ± 0.01b | 0.09 ± 0.01a | 0.15 ± 0.01b | 5.95 ± 0.15b | |
| High | 0.56 ± 0.02b | 0.75 ± 0.05ab | 4.82 ± 0.30a | 0.22 ± 0.01ab | 0.07 ± 0.00b | 0.15 ± 0.00b | 5.99 ± 0.15b | |
| 2014.1 | Low | 0.68 ± 0.03a | 0.74 ± 0.04c | 4.20 ± 0.27a | 0.22 ± 0.02a | 0.09 ± 0.00a | 0.16 ± 0.00a | 7.10 ± 0.09a |
| Intermediate | 0.46 ± 0.03b | 1.07 ± 0.03a | 3.25 ± 0.06b | 0.22 ± 0.01a | 0.08 ± 0.00b | 0.15 ± 0.01b | 6.39 ± 0.21b | |
| High | 0.54 ± 0.02b | 0.90 ± 0.03b | 3.77 ± 0.16ab | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.06 ± 0.00b | 0.14 ± 0.00b | 5.78 ± 0.09c | |
| 2014.3 | Low | 0.86 ± 0.06a | 0.65 ± 0.02b | 4.24 ± 0.11a | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.08 ± 0.00a | 0.15 ± 0.00a | 7.19 ± 0.07a |
| Intermediate | 0.66 ± 0.05b | 0.91 ± 0.04a | 2.93 ± 0.17b | 0.19 ± 0.01a | 0.07 ± 0.00a | 0.16 ± 0.00a | 6.28 ± 0.10b | |
| High | 0.64 ± 0.03b | 0.90 ± 0.03a | 2.96 ± 0.08b | 0.20 ± 0.01a | 0.06 ± 0.00b | 0.15 ± 0.00a | 6.00 ± 0.12b |
SM: soil moisture content; SBD: soil bulk density; SOM: soil organic matter; TN: total nitrogen; TP: total phosphorus; TK: total potassium. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE. Different letters indicate significant differences between elevations (P < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test).
Figure 2Ramet density
(A) and bud density (B) at three elevations at the four sampling time points. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3The density
(A) and mass fraction (B) of reproductive ramets, rhizome buds, and vegetative ramets at three elevations in March at the Dongting Lake wetlands. Different letters indicate differences at the 0.05 significance level (Tukey’s test).
Summary of the redundancy analysis (RDA) ordinations.
| Axes | Axis 1 | Axis 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Statistics | ||
| Eigenvalues | 0.686 | 0 |
| Species-environment correlations | 0.828** | 0.371* |
| Cumulative variance (%) | 68.6 | 68.6 |
| Elevation | −0.710** | −0.062 |
| SM | 0.439** | −0.196 |
| SBD | −0.035 | 0.109 |
| SOM | 0.471** | −0.059 |
| TN | 0.242 | −0.181 |
| TP | 0.459** | −0.119 |
| TK | 0.264 | 0.045 |
| pH | 0.676** | 0.028 |
| Ramet density | −0.382** | 0.026 |
SM: soil moisture content; SBD: soil bulk density; SOM: soil organic matter; TN: total nitrogen; TP: total phosphorus; TK; total potassium. Percentage variance of species-environment relationships explained by the first two ordination axes. Correlations indicate intra-set correlations of environmental factors with the first two ordination axes. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 4Redundancy analysis (RDA) biplots showing the relationships between reproductive allocation and environmental variables in Dongting Lake wetlands.
SM, soil moisture content; SBD, soil bulk density; SOM, soil organic matter; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; SEX_RE, mass fraction to reproductive ramets; CLO_RE, mass fraction to rhizome buds; REP_RD, the relative density of reproductive ramets; BUD_RD, the relative density of rhizome buds.