| Literature DB >> 30455714 |
Feng Li1,2,3, Cong Hu1,2, Yonghong Xie1,2, Wenzhi Liu3, Xinsheng Chen1,2, Zhengmiao Deng1,2, Zhiyong Hou1,2.
Abstract
Phosphoruspan> (P) enrichmenpan>t as a result of anthropogenpan>ic activities can potenpan>tially alter plant C:N:P stoichiometry. However, the influence of different P enrichment frequencies on plant C:N:P stoichiometry in P-limited ecosystems is still unclear. In this study, we conducted a P-addition experiment to elucidate the effect of various P enrichment frequencies on the plant C:N:P stoichiometry of Carex brevicuspis in a freshwater wetland at Dongting Lake, China. We used four P enrichment frequencies (treatment A: no P addition; treatment B: three 0.1 g kg-1 additions at 10-day intervals; treatment C: two 0.15 g kg-1 additions at 15-day intervals; and treatment D: one 0.3 g kg-1 addition during the experimental period) in a factorial design with an experimental duration of 30 days. Biomass accumulation was lowest in the treatment A and highest in the treatment C, and increased with decreasing P addition frequency. The shoot:root ratio did not differ significantly between the four treatments. Both foliar and root C concentrations were not significantly different between the treatments. Foliar N concentration was significantly lower in the treatment D than in the other three treatments, while root N concentration did not differ significantly between the treatments. Both foliar and root P concentrations, and foliar C:N were much higher in the treatment B than in the treatment A. However, root C:N did not differ significantly between treatments. Both foliar and root C:P and N:P of C. brevicuspis were lower in the treatment B than in the treatment A. These results indicated that different frequencies of P addition significantly influenced plant growth. Moreover, P enrichment, rather than frequency, significantly influenced plant C:N:P stoichiometry. Our results improve our understanding of the influence of different P enrichment frequencies on plant C:N:P stoichiometry and nutrient cycling in freshwater wetlands.Entities:
Keywords: Carex brevicuspis; P enrichment frequency; biomass accumulation; biomass allocation; plant C:N:P stoichiometry
Year: 2018 PMID: 30455714 PMCID: PMC6231420 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Dongting Lake, showing the location of the study site. The shaded areas represent the wetlands.
Soil characteristics (mean ± SE) after different P addition frequency treatments (treatments A–D represent: no P addition treatment; three – time P addition treatment; two-time P addition treatment; and one-time P addition treatment, respectively).
| Treatments | Total nitrogen content (mg g−1) | Total phosphorus content (mg g−1) | Organic carbon content (mg g−1) | C:N | C:P | N:P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.87 ± 0.02a | 0.73 ± 0.01b | 7.07 ± 0.14 | 8.20 ± 0.14b | 9.69 ± 0.15 | 1.18 ± 0.02a |
| B | 0.82 ± 0.02ab | 0.77 ± 0.01ab | 7.23 ± 0.15 | 8.87 ± 0.14ab | 9.42 ± 0.17 | 1.07 ± 0.03ab |
| C | 0.79 ± 0.05ab | 0.79 ± 0.02a | 7.14 ± 0.25 | 9.25 ± 0.42a | 9.11 ± 0.34 | 1.00 ± 0.06bc |
| D | 0.72 ± 0.04b | 0.77 ± 0.02ab | 6.87 ± 0.24 | 9.64 ± 0.25a | 8.92 ± 0.33 | 0.94 ± 0.05c |
FIGURE 2Biomass accumulation (A) and allocation (B) of Carex brevicuspis (means ± standard errors, n = 7) under different P addition frequencies (treatments A–D represent: no P addition treatment; three - time P addition treatment; two-time P addition treatment; and one-time P addition treatment, respectively). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the 0.05 significance level.
FIGURE 3Foliar ecological stoichiometry (A–F) of Carex brevicuspis (means ± standard errors, n = 7) under different P addition frequencies (treatments A–D represent: no P addition treatment; three - time P addition treatment; two-time P addition treatment; and one-time P addition treatment, respectively). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the 0.05 significance level.
FIGURE 4Root ecological stoichiometry (A–F) of Carex brevicuspis (means ± standard errors, n = 7) under different P addition frequencies (treatments A–D represent: no P addition treatment; three - time P addition treatment; two-time P addition treatment; and one-time P addition treatment, respectively). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments at the 0.05 significance level.