Literature DB >> 25728481

Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

Jose L Estrada1, Greg Martens1, Ping Li1, Andrew Adams2,3, Kenneth A Newell3, Mandy L Ford3, James R Butler1, Richard Sidner1, Matt Tector4, Joseph Tector1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous inactivation of pig GGTA1 and CMAH genes eliminates carbohydrate xenoantigens recognized by human antibodies. The β4GalNT2 glycosyltransferase may also synthesize xenoantigens. To further characterize glycan-based species incompatibilities, we examined human and non-human primate antibody binding to cells derived from genetically modified pigs lacking these carbohydrate-modifying genes.
METHODS: The Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA were used to create pigs lacking GGTA1, GGTA1/CMAH, or GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from these animals and examined for binding to IgM and IgG from humans, rhesus macaques, and baboons.
RESULTS: Cells from GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 deficient pigs exhibited reduced human IgM and IgG binding compared to cells lacking both GGTA1 and CMAH. Non-human primate antibody reactivity with cells from the various pigs exhibited a slightly different pattern of reactivity than that seen in humans. Simultaneous inactivation of the GGTA1 and CMAH genes increased non-human primate antibody binding compared to cells lacking either GGTA1 only or to those deficient in GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2.
CONCLUSIONS: Inactivation of the β4GalNT2 gene reduces human and non-human primate antibody binding resulting in diminished porcine xenoantigenicity. The increased humoral immunity of non-human primates toward GGTA1-/CMAH-deficient cells compared to pigs lacking either GGTA1 or GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 highlights the complexities of carbohydrate xenoantigens and suggests potential limitations of the non-human primate model for examining some genetic modifications. The progressive reduction of swine xenoantigens recognized by human immunoglobulin through inactivation of pig GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes demonstrates that the antibody barrier to xenotransplantation can be minimized by genetic engineering.
© 2015 The Authors. Xenotransplantation Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Cas9; antibody; genetic engineering; primate; swine; xenoantigen; β4GalNT2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728481      PMCID: PMC4464961          DOI: 10.1111/xen.12161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  24 in total

1.  Erythrocytes from GGTA1/CMAH knockout pigs: implications for xenotransfusion and testing in non-human primates.

Authors:  Zheng-Yu Wang; Christopher Burlak; Jose L Estrada; Ping Li; Matthew F Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  Efficient nonmeiotic allele introgression in livestock using custom endonucleases.

Authors:  Wenfang Tan; Daniel F Carlson; Cheryl A Lancto; John R Garbe; Dennis A Webster; Perry B Hackett; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reduced binding of human antibodies to cells from GGTA1/CMAH KO pigs.

Authors:  C Burlak; L L Paris; A J Lutz; R A Sidner; J Estrada; P Li; M Tector; A J Tector
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Creating class I MHC-null pigs using guide RNA and the Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Luz M Reyes; Jose L Estrada; Zheng Yu Wang; Rachel J Blosser; Rashod F Smith; Richard A Sidner; Leela L Paris; Ross L Blankenship; Caitlin N Ray; Aaron C Miner; Matthew Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Efficient generation of genetically distinct pigs in a single pregnancy using multiplexed single-guide RNA and carbohydrate selection.

Authors:  Ping Li; Jose L Estrada; Christopher Burlak; Jessica Montgomery; James R Butler; Rafael M Santos; Zheng-Yu Wang; Leela L Paris; Ross L Blankenship; Susan M Downey; Matthew Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.907

6.  Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Kiho Lee; Joshua A Benne; Benjamin P Beaton; Lee D Spate; Stephanie L Murphy; Melissa S Samuel; Jiude Mao; Chad O'Gorman; Eric M Walters; Clifton N Murphy; John Driver; Alan Mileham; David McLaren; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  The combinational use of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing and targeted toxin technology enables efficient biallelic knockout of the α-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene in porcine embryonic fibroblasts.

Authors:  Masahiro Sato; Kazuchika Miyoshi; Yozo Nagao; Yohei Nishi; Masato Ohtsuka; Shingo Nakamura; Takayuki Sakurai; Satoshi Watanabe
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 8.  Discovery of the natural anti-Gal antibody and its past and future relevance to medicine.

Authors:  Uri Galili
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ajay K Israni; Nicholas Salkowski; Sally Gustafson; Jon J Snyder; John J Friedewald; Richard N Formica; Xinyue Wang; Eugene Shteyn; Wida Cherikh; Darren Stewart; Ciara J Samana; Adrine Chung; Allyson Hart; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Cloning and expression of porcine β1,4 N-acetylgalactosaminyl transferase encoding a new xenoreactive antigen.

Authors:  Guerard W Byrne; Zeji Du; Paul Stalboerger; Heide Kogelberg; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.907

View more
  110 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Current status of pig heart xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Muhammad M Mohiuddin; Bruno Reichart; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Pig-to-Primate Islet Xenotransplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Zhengzhao Liu; Wenbao Hu; Tian He; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; Rita Bottino; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Silencing porcine genes significantly reduces human-anti-pig cytotoxicity profiles: an alternative to direct complement regulation.

Authors:  James R Butler; Gregory R Martens; Jose L Estrada; Luz M Reyes; Joseph M Ladowski; Cesare Galli; Andrea Perota; Conor M Cunningham; Matthew Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  In Search of the Ideal Valve: Optimizing Genetic Modifications to Prevent Bioprosthetic Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin Smood; Hidetaka Hara; David C Cleveland; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  A review of pig liver xenotransplantation: Current problems and recent progress.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxu Yang; Kaishan Tao; Quancheng Wang; Bin Dai; Shibin Qu; Wei Peng; Hong Zhang; David K C Cooper; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 7.  Genetically-engineered pigs as sources for clinical red blood cell transfusion: What pathobiological barriers need to be overcome?

Authors:  Benjamin Smood; Hidetaka Hara; Leah J Schoel; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Early barriers to neonatal porcine islet engraftment in a dual transplant model.

Authors:  K P Samy; R P Davis; Q Gao; B M Martin; M Song; J Cano; A B Farris; A McDonald; E K Gall; C R Dove; F V Leopardi; T How; K D Williams; G R Devi; B H Collins; A D Kirk
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  A Technology Roadmap for Innovative Approaches to Kidney Replacement Therapies: A Catalyst for Change.

Authors:  Joseph V Bonventre; Frank P Hurst; Melissa West; Iwen Wu; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Murray Sheldon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Examining the Biosynthesis and Xenoantigenicity of Class II Swine Leukocyte Antigen Proteins.

Authors:  Joseph M Ladowski; Gregory R Martens; Luz M Reyes; Zheng-Yu Wang; Devin E Eckhoff; Vera Hauptfeld-Dolejsek; Matt Tector; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.