Literature DB >> 30836101

In Search of the Ideal Valve: Optimizing Genetic Modifications to Prevent Bioprosthetic Degeneration.

Benjamin Smood1, Hidetaka Hara1, David C Cleveland2, David K C Cooper3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bioprosthetic heart valves undergo structural degeneration and calcification. Similarities exist in the histopathologic features of explanted bioprosthetic valves and rejected pig tissues and organs after xenotransplantation into nonhuman primates. The development of more durable bioprosthetic valves, namely from genetically modified pigs, could negate the need for the insertion of mechanical prostheses in children and young adults with the requirement for life-long anticoagulation and might avoid the need for reoperation in elderly patients.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature (MedlinePlus, PubMed, Google Scholar) through September 1, 2018, under four key terms: (1) bioprosthetic heart valves, (2) xenograft antigens, (3) immunologic responses to bioprosthetic valves, and (4) genetic modification of xenografts.
RESULTS: Advances in tissue and organ xenotransplantation have elucidated important immunologic barriers that provide innovative approaches to prevent structural degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves. The current evidence suggests that bioprosthetic valves derived from genetically modified pigs lacking xenogeneic antigens (namely Gal, Neu5Gc, and Sda), termed triple-knockout pigs, would function considerably longer than current wild-type (genetically unmodified) porcine valves in human recipients.
CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical and clinical studies to determine the safety and efficacy of triple-knockout porcine bioprosthetic valves will likely establish that they are more resistant to human immune responses and thus less susceptible to structural degeneration.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30836101      PMCID: PMC6656597          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  79 in total

1.  Characterization of the cellular infiltrate in bioprosthetic heart valves explanted from patients with structural valve deterioration.

Authors:  Rizwan A Manji; Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  One-year heterotopic cardiac xenograft survival in a pig to baboon model.

Authors:  M M Mohiuddin; A K Singh; P C Corcoran; R F Hoyt; M L Thomas; B G T Lewis; M Eckhaus; K A Reimann; N Klymiuk; E Wolf; D Ayares; K A Horvath
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Expression of NeuGc on pig heart valves.

Authors:  Whayoung Lee; Hidetaka Hara; David K C Cooper; Rizwan A Manji
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Leukocytes, platelets, and surface microstructure of spontaneously degenerated porcine bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  P D Stein; C H Wang; J M Riddle; D J Magilligan
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Man, apes, and Old World monkeys differ from other mammals in the expression of alpha-galactosyl epitopes on nucleated cells.

Authors:  U Galili; S B Shohet; E Kobrin; C L Stults; B A Macher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Glutaraldehyde-fixed bioprosthetic heart valve conduits calcify and fail from xenograft rejection.

Authors:  Rizwan A Manji; Lin F Zhu; Nimrit K Nijjar; David C Rayner; Greg S Korbutt; Thomas A Churchill; Ray V Rajotte; Arvind Koshal; David B Ross
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Cardiac xenotransplantation technology provides materials for improved bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Christopher G A McGregor; Alain Carpentier; Nermine Lila; John S Logan; Guerard W Byrne
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Mechanical or Biologic Prostheses for Aortic-Valve and Mitral-Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Peter Chiu; Michael Baiocchi; Bharathi Lingala; William L Patrick; Michael P Fischbein; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Bioprosthetic heart valves: modes of failure.

Authors:  Raheela Fareed Siddiqui; Johnathan Rajiv Abraham; Jagdish Butany
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Reducing immunoreactivity of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves by genetically-deleting three major glycan antigens, GGTA1/β4GalNT2/CMAH.

Authors:  Runjie Zhang; Ying Wang; Lei Chen; Ronggen Wang; Chu Li; Xiaoxue Li; Bin Fang; Xueyang Ren; Miaomiao Ruan; Jiying Liu; Qiang Xiong; Lining Zhang; Yong Jin; Manling Zhang; Xiaorui Liu; Lin Li; Qiang Chen; Dengke Pan; Rongfeng Li; David K C Cooper; Haiyuan Yang; Yifan Dai
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Current state of transcatheter mitral valve implantation in bioprosthetic mitral valve and in mitral ring as a treatment approach for failed mitral prosthesis.

Authors:  Vratika Agarwal; Ryan K Kaple; Hetal H Mehta; Prabhjot Singh; Vinayak N Bapat
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 2.  Immune disguise: the mechanisms of Neu5Gc inducing autoimmune and transplant rejection.

Authors:  Fadian Ding; Yunfeng Lin; Guozhong Liu; Yuxin Liu; Feng Gao; Qicai Liu; Zhibo Zhang; Shangeng Weng
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.248

3.  The potential role of 3D-bioprinting in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Ping Li; Wenjun Zhang; Lester J Smith; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 4.  N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid (Neu5Gc) Null Large Animals by Targeting the CMP-Neu5Gc Hydroxylase (CMAH).

Authors:  Andrea Perota; Cesare Galli
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  In Situ "Humanization" of Porcine Bioprostheses: Demonstration of Tendon Bioprostheses Conversion into Human ACL and Possible Implications for Heart Valve Bioprostheses.

Authors:  Uri Galili; Kevin R Stone
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12

6.  Residual immune response towards decellularized homografts may be highly individual.

Authors:  Johannes Ebken; Nils Mester; Isabel Smart; Robert Ramm; Tobias Goecke; Ramadan Jashari; Dietmar Böthig; Alexander Horke; Serghei Cebotari; Igor Tudorache; Murat Avsar; Dmitry Bobylev; Axel Haverich; Samir Sarikouch; Andres Hilfiker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Can Heart Valve Decellularization Be Standardized? A Review of the Parameters Used for the Quality Control of Decellularization Processes.

Authors:  F Naso; A Gandaglia
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Biological Equivalence of GGTA-1 Glycosyltransferase Knockout and Standard Porcine Pericardial Tissue Using 90-Day Mitral Valve Implantation in Adolescent Sheep.

Authors:  Christopher McGregor; Jacob Salmonsmith; Gaetano Burriesci; Guerard Byrne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.305

Review 9.  Materials and manufacturing perspectives in engineering heart valves: a review.

Authors:  F Oveissi; S Naficy; A Lee; D S Winlaw; F Dehghani
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-12-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.