Literature DB >> 25100712

Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.

Kristin M Whitworth1, Kiho Lee1, Joshua A Benne1, Benjamin P Beaton2, Lee D Spate3, Stephanie L Murphy1, Melissa S Samuel3, Jiude Mao2, Chad O'Gorman2, Eric M Walters2, Clifton N Murphy1, John Driver4, Alan Mileham5, David McLaren5, Kevin D Wells3, Randall S Prather6.   

Abstract

Targeted modification of the pig genome can be challenging. Recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system hold promise for improving the efficacy of genome editing. When a designed CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting CD163 or CD1D was introduced into somatic cells, it was highly efficient in inducing mutations. When these mutated cells were used with somatic cell nuclear transfer, offspring with these modifications were created. When the CRISPR/Cas9 system was delivered into in vitro produced presumptive porcine zygotes, the system was effective in creating mutations in eGFP, CD163, and CD1D (100% targeting efficiency in blastocyst stage embryos); however, it also presented some embryo toxicity. We could also induce deletions in CD163 or CD1D by introducing two types of CRISPRs with Cas9. The system could also disrupt two genes, CD163 and eGFP, simultaneously when two CRISPRs targeting two genes with Cas9 were delivered into zygotes. Direct injection of CRISPR/Cas9 targeting CD163 or CD1D into zygotes resulted in piglets that have mutations on both alleles with only one CD1D pig having a mosaic genotype. We show here that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used by two methods. The system can be used to modify somatic cells followed by somatic cell nuclear transfer. System components can also be used in in vitro produced zygotes to generate pigs with specific genetic modifications.
© 2014 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; blastocyst; embryo; genetic engineering; porcine/pig; somatic cell nuclear transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100712      PMCID: PMC4435063          DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.121723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  40 in total

1.  Activation method does not alter abnormal placental gene expression and development in cloned pigs.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Lee D Spate; Rongfeng Li; August Rieke; Peter Sutovsky; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.609

2.  U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011.

Authors:  Shelley McGuire
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Scriptaid corrects gene expression of a few aberrantly reprogrammed transcripts in nuclear transfer pig blastocyst stage embryos.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jiangou Zhao; Lee D Spate; Rongfeng Li; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 4.  Genetic modifications of pigs for medicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  Generation of PPARγ mono-allelic knockout pigs via zinc-finger nucleases and nuclear transfer cloning.

Authors:  Dongshan Yang; Huaqiang Yang; Wei Li; Bentian Zhao; Zhen Ouyang; Zhaoming Liu; Yu Zhao; Nana Fan; Jun Song; Jiangtian Tian; Feng Li; Jifeng Zhang; Lin Chang; Duanqing Pei; Y Eugene Chen; Liangxue Lai
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  Efficient generation of a biallelic knockout in pigs using zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Janet Hauschild; Bjoern Petersen; Yolanda Santiago; Anna-Lisa Queisser; Joseph W Carnwath; Andrea Lucas-Hahn; Lei Zhang; Xiangdong Meng; Philip D Gregory; Reinhard Schwinzer; Gregory J Cost; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene targeting with zinc finger nucleases to produce cloned eGFP knockout pigs.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Whyte; Jianguo Zhao; Kevin D Wells; Melissa S Samuel; Kristin M Whitworth; Eric M Walters; M Harold Laughlin; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 8.  CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Michael P Terns; Rebecca M Terns
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 9.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus entry into the porcine macrophage.

Authors:  Wander Van Breedam; Peter L Delputte; Hanne Van Gorp; Gerald Misinzo; Nathalie Vanderheijden; Xiaobo Duan; Hans J Nauwynck
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.891

10.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhao; Yanhong Hao; Jason W Ross; Lee D Spate; Eric M Walters; Melissa S Samuel; August Rieke; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.987

View more
  127 in total

1.  Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Raymond R R Rowland; Catherine L Ewen; Benjamin R Trible; Maureen A Kerrigan; Ada G Cino-Ozuna; Melissa S Samuel; Jonathan E Lightner; David G McLaren; Alan J Mileham; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

Authors:  Jose L Estrada; Greg Martens; Ping Li; Andrew Adams; Kenneth A Newell; Mandy L Ford; James R Butler; Richard Sidner; Matt Tector; Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Ablation of conceptus PTGS2 expression does not alter early conceptus development and establishment of pregnancy in the pig†.

Authors:  Caroline A Pfeiffer; Ashley E Meyer; Kelsey E Brooks; Paula R Chen; Jessica Milano-Foster; Lee D Spate; Joshua A Benne; Raissa F Cecil; Melissa S Samuel; Lauren A Ciernia; Christine M Spinka; Michael F Smith; Kevin D Wells; Thomas E Spencer; Randall S Prather; Rodney D Geisert
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Targeted disruption of CD1d prevents NKT cell development in pigs.

Authors:  Guan Yang; Bianca L Artiaga; Timothy J Hackmann; Melissa S Samuel; Eric M Walters; Shahram Salek-Ardakani; John P Driver
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bhanu P Telugu; Ki-Eun Park; Chi-Hun Park
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Quantitative assessment of timing, efficiency, specificity and genetic mosaicism of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of hemoglobin beta gene in rhesus monkey embryos.

Authors:  Uros Midic; Pei-Hsuan Hung; Kailey A Vincent; Benjamin Goheen; Patrick G Schupp; Diane D Chen; Daniel E Bauer; Catherine A VandeVoort; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Guangdong small-ear spotted pig cells using an optimized electrotransfection method.

Authors:  Yan-Yan Wei; Qun-Mei Zhan; Xiang-Xing Zhu; Ai-Fen Yan; Juan Feng; Lian Liu; Jian-Hao Li; Dong-Sheng Tang
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 10.  Exogenous enzymes upgrade transgenesis and genetic engineering of farm animals.

Authors:  Pablo Bosch; Diego O Forcato; Fabrisio E Alustiza; Ana P Alessio; Alejandro E Fili; María F Olmos Nicotra; Ana C Liaudat; Nancy Rodríguez; Thirumala R Talluri; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.