Literature DB >> 24833128

New national allocation policy for deceased donor kidneys in the United States and possible effect on patient outcomes.

Ajay K Israni1, Nicholas Salkowski2, Sally Gustafson2, Jon J Snyder3, John J Friedewald4, Richard N Formica5, Xinyue Wang2, Eugene Shteyn2, Wida Cherikh6, Darren Stewart6, Ciara J Samana6, Adrine Chung2, Allyson Hart7, Bertram L Kasiske8.   

Abstract

In 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network in the United States approved a new national deceased donor kidney allocation policy that introduces the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), which gives scores of 0%-100% based on 10 donor factors. Kidneys with lower KDPI scores are associated with better post-transplant survival. Important features of the new policy include first allocating kidneys from donors with a KDPI≤20% to candidates in the top 20th percentile of estimated post-transplant survival, adding waiting time from dialysis initiation, conferring priority points for a calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA)>19%, broader sharing of kidneys for candidates with a CPRA≥99%, broader sharing of kidneys from donors with a KDPI>85%, eliminating the payback system, and allocating blood type A2 and A2B kidneys to blood type B candidates. We simulated the distribution of kidneys under the new policy compared with the current allocation policy. The simulation showed increases in projected median allograft years of life with the new policy (9.07 years) compared with the current policy (8.82 years). With the new policy, candidates with a CPRA>20%, with blood type B, and aged 18-49 years were more likely to undergo transplant, but transplants declined in candidates aged 50-64 years (4.1% decline) and ≥65 years (2.7% decline). These simulations demonstrate that the new deceased donor kidney allocation policy may improve overall post-transplant survival and access for highly sensitized candidates, with minimal effects on access to transplant by race/ethnicity and declines in kidney allocation for candidates aged ≥50 years.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24833128      PMCID: PMC4116061          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013070784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  10 in total

1.  Transplantation of A2 kidneys into B and O recipients leads to reduction in waiting time: USRDS experience.

Authors:  Frank P Hurst; Imran Sajjad; Eric A Elster; Edward M Falta; Prem Patel; Kevin C Abbott; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Rahul M Jindal
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: kidney.

Authors:  A J Matas; J M Smith; M A Skeans; K E Lamb; S K Gustafson; C J Samana; D E Stewart; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Preemptive kidney transplantation: the advantage and the advantaged.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Jon J Snyder; Arthur J Matas; Mary D Ellison; John S Gill; Annamaria T Kausz
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States.

Authors:  J M Smith; S W Biggins; D G Haselby; W R Kim; J Wedd; K Lamb; B Thompson; D L Segev; S Gustafson; R Kandaswamy; P G Stock; A J Matas; C J Samana; E F Sleeman; D Stewart; A Harper; E Edwards; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index.

Authors:  Panduranga S Rao; Douglas E Schaubel; Mary K Guidinger; Kenneth A Andreoni; Robert A Wolfe; Robert M Merion; Friedrich K Port; Randall S Sung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Race and socioeconomic factors influencing early placement on the kidney transplant waiting list.

Authors:  B L Kasiske; W London; M D Ellison
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Calculating life years from transplant (LYFT): methods for kidney and kidney-pancreas candidates.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; K P McCullough; D E Schaubel; J D Kalbfleisch; S Murray; M D Stegall; A B Leichtman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Richard J Shaw; Laura Palmer; Christine Blasey; Minnie Sarwal
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2003-12

10.  Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor.

Authors:  G C Alexander; A R Sehgal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  114 in total

Review 1.  New Solutions to Reduce Discard of Kidneys Donated for Transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Meera N Harhay; Peter L Abt; Matthew H Levine; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Sensitized Candidates.

Authors:  Richard N Formica
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

Authors:  Jose L Estrada; Greg Martens; Ping Li; Andrew Adams; Kenneth A Newell; Mandy L Ford; James R Butler; Richard Sidner; Matt Tector; Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Outcomes After Declining Increased Infectious Risk Kidney Offers for Pediatric Candidates in the United States.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Kyle R Jackson; Heather Wasik; Alicia Neu; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Christine Durand; Niraj Desai; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Approach to the Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidate.

Authors:  Douglas S Keith; Gayle M Vranic
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Impact of prolonged dialysis prior to renal transplantation.

Authors:  David D Aufhauser; Allison W Peng; Douglas R Murken; Seth J Concors; Peter L Abt; Deirdre Sawinski; Roy D Bloom; Peter P Reese; Matthew H Levine
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Bhavna Chopra; Kalathil K Sureshkumar
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-06-24

8.  Cognitive Impairment in Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD and the Transition to Dialysis: Findings From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

Authors:  Meera N Harhay; Dawei Xie; Xiaoming Zhang; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Eric Vittinghoff; Alan S Go; Stephen M Sozio; Jacob Blumenthal; Stephen Seliger; Jing Chen; Rajat Deo; Mirela Dobre; Sanjeev Akkina; Peter P Reese; James P Lash; Kristine Yaffe; Manjula Kurella Tamura
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Evolving Trends in Racial Disparities for Peri-Operative Outcomes with the New Kidney Allocation System (KAS) Implementation.

Authors:  Daisy Sanchez; Derek Dubay; Baliga Prabhakar; David J Taber
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-03-19

10.  Predicting kidney transplant outcomes with partial knowledge of HLA mismatch.

Authors:  Charles F Manski; Anat R Tambur; Michael Gmeiner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.