Literature DB >> 25723112

The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Olca Basturk1, Zhaohai Yang, Laura H Tang, Ralph H Hruban, Volkan Adsay, Chad M McCall, Alyssa M Krasinskas, Kee-Taek Jang, Wendy L Frankel, Serdar Balci, Carlie Sigel, David S Klimstra.   

Abstract

The 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification recommends that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) be graded on the basis of the mitotic rate and Ki67 index, with grade 2 (G2) PanNETs defined as having a mitotic rate of 2 to 20 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields or a Ki67 index of 3% to 20%. Grade 3 (G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is defined as having >20 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields or a Ki67 index of >20%. However, some PanNETs show discordance between the mitotic rate and Ki67 index, usually having a Ki67 index in the G3 range but a mitotic rate suggesting G2, prompting us to examine the clinical significance of the Ki67 index in a large series of clinically well-characterized mitotic G2 PanNETs. Mitotic G2 well differentiated PanNETs, surgically resected at our institutions were reviewed. Of those, 19 cases had a Ki67>20% and were selected as the study group of grade-discordant (mitotic count G2/Ki67 index G3) PanNETs. For comparison, 53 grade-concordant (both mitotic count and Ki67 index G2) PanNETs matched for presenting stage with the discordant group as well as 43 morphologically poorly differentiated (either small cell or large cell type) pancreatic NECs were also included. The percentage of Ki67-positive neoplastic cells was quantified by manual counting of at least 500 cells on printed photographic images of "hot spots." The mean Ki67 index for grade-concordant and grade-discordant PanNETs and poorly differentiated NECs were 8.1% (range, 3% to 20%), 40% (range, 24% to 80%), and 70% (range, 40% to 98%), respectively. Overall, patients with grade-discordant PanNETs had significantly longer survival time compared with the patients with poorly differentiated NEC (median survival of 54.1 vs. 11 mo and 5 y survival of 29.1% vs. 16.1%; P=0.002). In addition, the survival time of the patients with grade-discordant PanNETs was shorter than that of the patients with grade-concordant PanNETs (median survival of 67.8 mo and 5 y survival of 62.4%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.2). Our data support the notion that the mitotic rate and Ki67 index-based grades of PanNETs can be discordant, and when the Ki67 index indicates G3, the clinical outcome is slightly worse. More importantly, we demonstrate that well differentiated PanNETs that are G3 by Ki67 are significantly less aggressive than bona fide poorly differentiated NECs, suggesting that the current WHO G3 category is heterogenous, contains 2 distinct neoplasms, and can be further separated into well differentiated PanNET with an elevated proliferation rate and poorly differentiated NEC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723112      PMCID: PMC4398606          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  7 in total

1.  Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Efsevia Vakiani; Catherine M White; Yi Zhong; Tyler Saunders; Richard Morgan; Roeland F de Wilde; Anirban Maitra; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M Demarzo; Chanjuan Shi; Rajni Sharma; Daniel Laheru; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Grading of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate.

Authors:  Chad M McCall; Chanjuan Shi; Toby C Cornish; David S Klimstra; Laura H Tang; Olca Basturk; Liew Jun Mun; Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 44 cases.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Laura Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Zhaohai Yang; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Efsevia Vakiani; Stefano La Rosa; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Xiuli Liu; Lizhi Zhang; Thomas J Giordano; Andrew M Bellizzi; Jey-Hsin Chen; Chanjuan Shi; Peter Allen; Diane L Reidy; Christopher L Wolfgang; Burcu Saka; Neda Rezaee; Vikram Deshpande; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Ki-67 predicts disease recurrence and poor prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Ta-Chiang Liu; Antonino Cavatiao; Kareem Mawad; Ling Chen; Steven S Strasberg; David C Linehan; Dengfeng Cao; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Ki-67 labeling: a more sensitive indicator of malignant phenotype than mitotic count or tumor size?

Authors:  Kevin Lowe; Amit Khithani; Elizabeth Liu; Tanyss Winston; Derrick Christian; Joe Saad; Dhiresh Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study.

Authors:  H Sorbye; S Welin; S W Langer; L W Vestermark; N Holt; P Osterlund; S Dueland; E Hofsli; M G Guren; K Ohrling; E Birkemeyer; E Thiis-Evensen; M Biagini; H Gronbaek; L M Soveri; I H Olsen; B Federspiel; J Assmus; E T Janson; U Knigge
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

  7 in total
  126 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: implications for the clinic.

Authors:  Antonio Pea; Ralph H Hruban; Laura D Wood
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 2.  [Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the head and neck].

Authors:  B Konukiewitz; A Agaimy; W Weichert; G Klöppel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  G3 GEP NENs category: are basic and clinical investigations well integrated?

Authors:  Massimo Milione; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Mohamad Bassam Sonbol; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19

5.  Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  J Zou; Q Li; F Kou; Y Zhu; M Lu; J Li; Z Lu; L Shen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Characterization of the Neuroendocrine Tumor Immune Microenvironment.

Authors:  Annacarolina da Silva; Michaela Bowden; Sui Zhang; Yohei Masugi; Aaron R Thorner; Zachary T Herbert; Chensheng Willa Zhou; Lauren Brais; Jennifer A Chan; F Stephen Hodi; Scott Rodig; Shuji Ogino; Matthew H Kulke
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Immunohistochemical analysis of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Vivian Weiss; Julie Dueber; Jesse P Wright; Justin Cates; Frank Revetta; Alexander A Parikh; Nipun B Merchant; Chanjuan Shi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15

8.  Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 9.  Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract revisited: towards precision medicine.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 10.  Systemic Therapies for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Nitya Raj; Diane Reidy-Lagunes
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.