Literature DB >> 22549809

Ki-67 labeling: a more sensitive indicator of malignant phenotype than mitotic count or tumor size?

Kevin Lowe1, Amit Khithani, Elizabeth Liu, Tanyss Winston, Derrick Christian, Joe Saad, Dhiresh Rohan Jeyarajah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Ki-67 index has been incorporated into The World Health Organization's classification system of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, pathologists continue to question the utility of Ki-67 index over that of mitotic count as an indicator of proliferative activity. The intent of the current study is to compare K-i67 index with tumor size and mitotic rate for the association of each with lymph node metastasis and survival.
METHODS: The current study is a review of 24 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
RESULTS: Regional LNM were present in 100% of tumors with Ki-67 index >10%, while only 25% of tumors with <10% Ki-67 had LNM (P = 0.003). No tumors <2 cm had >10% Ki-67 labeling. Of patients with tumors showing ≥ 10% Ki-67 labeling, 80% died during the observation period of this study, while during the same time period, no patients with <10% Ki-67 labeling died.
CONCLUSION: Ki-67 index of >10% is a sensitive indicator of malignant behavior and mortality. Future advances in management of pNETs will require development of staging guidelines with higher predictive value. Inclusion of Ki-67 labeling >10% as an indicator of aggressive disease may contribute to such improvements.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22549809     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  12 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Chad M McCall; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Serdar Balci; Carlie Sigel; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Grading of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate.

Authors:  Chad M McCall; Chanjuan Shi; Toby C Cornish; David S Klimstra; Laura H Tang; Olca Basturk; Liew Jun Mun; Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Mixed Adeno-neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An Aggressive Clinical Entity.

Authors:  Shayna Brathwaite; Jonathan Rock; Martha M Yearsley; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Lai Wei; Wendy L Frankel; John Hays; Christina Wu; Sherif Abdel-Misih
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  A Novel Validated Recurrence Risk Score to Guide a Pragmatic Surveillance Strategy After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An International Study of 1006 Patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Y Zaidi; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Joseph Lipscomb; Valentina Andreasi; Stefano Partelli; Adriana C Gamboa; Rachel M Lee; George A Poultsides; Mary Dillhoff; Flavio G Rocha; Kamran Idrees; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber; Ryan C Fields; Charles A Staley; Massimo Falconi; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A simple and practical index predicting the prognoses of the patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Atsushi Kudo; Yuko Kinowaki; Toshiro Ogura; Kosuke Ogawa; Hiroaki Ono; Yusuke Mitsunori; Daisuke Ban; Shinji Tanaka; Takumi Akashi; Minoru Tanabe
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Interlaboratory variability of MIB1 staining in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Annika Blank; Laura Wehweck; Ilaria Marinoni; Laura Amanda Boos; Frank Bergmann; Anja Maria Schmitt; Aurel Perren
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Ki-67 is a reliable pathological grading marker for neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Ashlie Nadler; Moises Cukier; Corwyn Rowsell; Sepideh Kamali; Yael Feinberg; Simron Singh; Calvin H L Law
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications.

Authors:  Marcela S Cavalcanti; Mithat Gönen; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Int J Endocr Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14

10.  Can PPH3 be helpful to assess the discordant grade in primary and metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

Authors:  Clotilde Dumars; Fanny Foubert; Yann Touchefeu; Nicolas Regenet; Hélène Senellart; Tamara Matysiak-Budnik; Marie-Françoise Heymann
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.