Literature DB >> 24503751

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic analysis of 44 cases.

Olca Basturk1, Laura Tang, Ralph H Hruban, Volkan Adsay, Zhaohai Yang, Alyssa M Krasinskas, Efsevia Vakiani, Stefano La Rosa, Kee-Taek Jang, Wendy L Frankel, Xiuli Liu, Lizhi Zhang, Thomas J Giordano, Andrew M Bellizzi, Jey-Hsin Chen, Chanjuan Shi, Peter Allen, Diane L Reidy, Christopher L Wolfgang, Burcu Saka, Neda Rezaee, Vikram Deshpande, David S Klimstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the pancreas, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas include small cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and are rare; data regarding their pathologic and clinical features are very limited.
DESIGN: A total of 107 pancreatic resections originally diagnosed as poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas were reassessed using the classification and grading (mitotic rate/Ki67 index) criteria put forth by the World Health Organization in 2010 for the gastroenteropancreatic system. Immunohistochemical labeling for neuroendocrine and acinar differentiation markers was performed. Sixty-three cases were reclassified, mostly as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) or acinar cell carcinoma, and eliminated. The clinicopathologic features and survival of the remaining 44 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas were further assessed.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 59 years (range, 21 to 82 y), and the male/female ratio was 1.4. Twenty-seven tumors were located in the head of the pancreas, 3 in the body, and 11 in the tail. The median tumor size was 4 cm (range, 2 to 18 cm). Twenty-seven tumors were large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and 17 were small cell carcinomas (mean mitotic rate, 37/10 and 51/10 HPF; mean Ki67 index, 66% and 75%, respectively). Eight tumors had combined components, mostly adenocarcinomas. In addition, 2 tumors had components of well-differentiated NET. Eighty-eight percent of the patients had nodal or distant metastatic disease at presentation, and an additional 7% developed metastases subsequently. Follow-up information was available for 43 patients; 33 died of disease, with a median survival of 11 months (range, 0 to 104 mo); 8 were alive with disease, with a median follow-up of 19.5 months (range, 0 to 71 mo). The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 22.5% and 16.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas is a highly aggressive neoplasm, with frequent metastases and poor survival. Most patients die within less than a year. Most (61%) are large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Well-differentiated NET and acinar cell carcinoma are often misdiagnosed as poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, emphasizing that diagnostic criteria need to be clearly followed to ensure accurate diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503751      PMCID: PMC3977000          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  34 in total

1.  Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Efsevia Vakiani; Catherine M White; Yi Zhong; Tyler Saunders; Richard Morgan; Roeland F de Wilde; Anirban Maitra; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M Demarzo; Chanjuan Shi; Rajni Sharma; Daniel Laheru; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Complete remission of refractory small cell carcinoma of the pancreas with cisplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  R Morant; H W Bruckner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prognostic factors in pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: an analysis of 136 cases with a proposal for low-grade and intermediate-grade groups.

Authors:  Steven N Hochwald; Sui Zee; Kevin C Conlon; Roberto Colleoni; Otway Louie; Murray F Brennan; David S Klimstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas with prominent ductal differentiation: Mixed acinar ductal carcinoma and mixed acinar endocrine ductal carcinoma.

Authors:  Edward B Stelow; Ruthy Shaco-Levy; Fei Bao; Joaquin Garcia; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE).

Authors:  R Garcia-Carbonero; J Capdevila; G Crespo-Herrero; J A Díaz-Pérez; M P Martínez Del Prado; V Alonso Orduña; I Sevilla-García; C Villabona-Artero; A Beguiristain-Gómez; M Llanos-Muñoz; M Marazuela; C Alvarez-Escola; D Castellano; E Vilar; P Jiménez-Fonseca; A Teulé; J Sastre-Valera; M Benavent-Viñuelas; A Monleon; R Salazar
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Small-cell carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: a review.

Authors:  Baruch Brenner; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; David P Kelsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma: single center experience with 61 patients.

Authors:  Sung Sook Lee; Jae-Lyun Lee; Min-Hee Ryu; Heung Moon Chang; Tae Won Kim; Woo Kun Kim; Jung Shin Lee; Se-Jin Jang; Shin Kwang Khang; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 8.  Clinical and therapeutic aspects of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Gabe S Sonke; Dirk T Sleijfer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  [A TNM classification for digestive endocrine tumors of midgut and hindgut: proposals from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS)].

Authors:  Anne Couvelard; Jean-Yves Scoazec
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.407

10.  Evaluation of the WHO 2010 grading and AJCC/UICC staging systems in prognostic behavior of intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Paula B Araujo; Sonia Cheng; Ozgur Mete; Stefano Serra; Emilie Morin; Sylvia L Asa; Shereen Ezzat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  63 in total

1.  Tumor Lysis Syndrome in an Unusual Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor with Ectopic ACTH Secretion.

Authors:  Michael Shusterman; Noah A Bloomgarden; Susan T Sotardi; Aditi Shastri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-12

2.  The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Chad M McCall; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Serdar Balci; Carlie Sigel; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms.

Authors:  Stefano La Rosa; Fausto Sessa; Silvia Uccella
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

Authors:  Romain Coriat; Thomas Walter; Benoît Terris; Anne Couvelard; Philippe Ruszniewski
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-08

6.  Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: A SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases.

Authors:  Arvind Dasari; Kathan Mehta; Lauren A Byers; Halfdan Sorbye; James C Yao
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Unraveling tumor grading and genomic landscape in lung neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pelosi; Mauro Papotti; Guido Rindi; Aldo Scarpa
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.943

8.  Treatment Response and Outcomes of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Based on Morphology: Well Differentiated Versus Poorly Differentiated.

Authors:  Nitya Raj; Emily Valentino; Marinela Capanu; Laura H Tang; Olca Basturk; Brian R Untch; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra; Diane Reidy-Lagunes
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  High-Grade Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Management and Outcomes: A National Cancer Database Study.

Authors:  Olatunji B Alese; Renjian Jiang; Walid Shaib; Christina Wu; Mehmet Akce; Madhusmita Behera; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Prognostic value of CT findings to predict survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single institutional study of 161 patients.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hyoung Jung Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Jae Ho Byun; So Yeon Kim; Ki Byung Song; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.