Literature DB >> 24121170

Grading of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate.

Chad M McCall1, Chanjuan Shi, Toby C Cornish, David S Klimstra, Laura H Tang, Olca Basturk, Liew Jun Mun, Trevor A Ellison, Christopher L Wolfgang, Michael A Choti, Richard D Schulick, Barish H Edil, Ralph H Hruban.   

Abstract

The grading system for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) adopted in 2010 by the World Health Organization (WHO) mandates the use of both mitotic rate and Ki67/MIB-1 index in defining the proliferative rate and assigning the grade. In cases when these measures are not concordant for grade, it is recommended to assign the higher grade, but specific data justifying this approach do not exist. Thus, we counted mitotic figures and immunolabeled, using the Ki67 antibody, 297 WHO mitotic grade 1 and 2 PanNETs surgically resected at a single institution. We quantified the Ki67 proliferative index by marking at least 500 cells in "hot spots" and by using digital image analysis software to count each marked positive/negative cell and then compared the results with histologic features and overall survival. Of 264 WHO mitotic grade 1 PanNETs, 33% were WHO grade 2 by Ki67 proliferative index. Compared with concordant grade 1 tumors, grade-discordant tumors were more likely to have metastases to lymph node (56% vs. 34%) (P<0.01) and to distant sites (46% vs. 12%) (P<0.01). Discordant mitotic grade 1 PanNETs also showed statistically significantly more infiltrative growth patterns, perineural invasion, and small vessel invasion. Overall survival was significantly different (P<0.01), with discordant mitotic grade 1 tumors showing a median survival of 12 years compared with 16.7 years for concordant grade 1 tumors. Conversely, mitotic grade 1/Ki67 grade 2 PanNETs showed few significant differences from tumors that were mitotic grade 2 and either Ki67 grade 1 or 2. Our data demonstrate that mitotic rate and Ki67-based grades of PanNETs are often discordant, and when the Ki67 grade is greater than the mitotic grade, clinical outcomes and histopathologic features are significantly worse than concordant grade 1 tumors. Patients with discordant mitotic grade 1/Ki67 grade 2 tumors have shorter overall survival and larger tumors with more metastases and more aggressive histologic features. These data strongly suggest that Ki67 labeling be performed on all PanNETs in addition to mitotic rate determination to define more accurately tumor grade and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121170      PMCID: PMC3891823          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the mitotic index using the mitosis marker anti-phosphohistone H3 in meningiomas.

Authors:  Yoo-Jin Kim; Ralf Ketter; Wolf-Ingo Steudel; Wolfgang Feiden
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Automated cellular imaging system III for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer specimens: development of a standardized scoring method that correlates with FISH.

Authors:  Douglas M Minot; Benjamin R Kipp; Renee M Root; Reid G Meyer; Carol A Reynolds; Aziza Nassar; Michael R Henry; Amy C Clayton
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  A single institution's 26-year experience with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a validation of current staging systems and a new prognostic nomogram.

Authors:  Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Chanjuan Shi; John L Cameron; Peter Murakami; Liew Jun Mun; Aatur D Singhi; Toby C Cornish; Kelly Olino; Zina Meriden; Michael Choti; Luis A Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Barish H Edil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Endocrine tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  Caroline S Verbeke
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Two mitosis-specific antibodies, MPM-2 and phospho-histone H3 (Ser28), allow rapid and precise determination of mitotic activity.

Authors:  Coya Tapia; Heinz Kutzner; Thomas Mentzel; Spasenija Savic; Daniel Baumhoer; Katharina Glatz
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set.

Authors:  David S Klimstra; Irvin R Modlin; N Volkan Adsay; Runjan Chetty; Vikram Deshpande; Mithat Gönen; Robert T Jensen; Mark Kidd; Matthew H Kulke; Ricardo V Lloyd; Cesar Moran; Steven F Moss; Kjell Oberg; Dermot O'Toole; Guido Rindi; Marie E Robert; Saul Suster; Laura H Tang; Chin-Yuan Tzen; Mary Kay Washington; Betram Wiedenmann; James Yao
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Ki-67 expression is superior to mitotic count and novel proliferation markers PHH3, MCM4 and mitosin as a prognostic factor in thick cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Rita G Ladstein; Ingeborg M Bachmann; Oddbjørn Straume; Lars A Akslen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Site-specific biology and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel; Guido Rindi; Martin Anlauf; Aurel Perren; Paul Komminoth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Improved histologic and clinicopathologic criteria for prognostic evaluation of pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Stefano La Rosa; Catherine Klersy; Silvia Uccella; Linda Dainese; Luca Albarello; Angelica Sonzogni; Claudio Doglioni; Carlo Capella; Enrico Solcia
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  49 in total

1.  The high-grade (WHO G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor category is morphologically and biologically heterogenous and includes both well differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms.

Authors:  Olca Basturk; Zhaohai Yang; Laura H Tang; Ralph H Hruban; Volkan Adsay; Chad M McCall; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Kee-Taek Jang; Wendy L Frankel; Serdar Balci; Carlie Sigel; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Towards a new classification of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Mark Kidd; Irvin Modlin; Kjell Öberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Pathological and molecular evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Arvind Rishi; Michael Goggins; Laura D Wood; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

Authors:  Andrew M Bellizzi
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors with a Morphologically Apparent High-Grade Component: A Pathway Distinct from Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.

Authors:  Laura H Tang; Brian R Untch; Diane L Reidy; Eileen O'Reilly; Deepti Dhall; Lily Jih; Olca Basturk; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  KI-67 heterogeneity in well differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: when is biopsy reliable for grade assessment?

Authors:  Federica Grillo; Luca Valle; Diego Ferone; Manuela Albertelli; Maria Pia Brisigotti; Giuseppe Cittadini; Alessandro Vanoli; Roberto Fiocca; Luca Mastracci
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  Unraveling tumor grading and genomic landscape in lung neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pelosi; Mauro Papotti; Guido Rindi; Aldo Scarpa
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Burcu Saka; N Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Increased Grade in Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases Negatively Impacts Survival.

Authors:  Kendall J Keck; Allen Choi; Jessica E Maxwell; Guiying Li; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Patrick Breheny; Andrew M Bellizzi; James R Howe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Ki-67 cytological index can distinguish well-differentiated from poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative cytohistological study of 53 cases.

Authors:  Gabriele Carlinfante; Paola Baccarini; Debora Berretti; Tiziana Cassetti; Maurizio Cavina; Rita Conigliaro; Alessandro De Pellegrin; Luca Di Tommaso; Carlo Fabbri; Adele Fornelli; Andrea Frasoldati; Giorgio Gardini; Luisa Losi; Livia Maccio; Raffaele Manta; Nico Pagano; Romano Sassatelli; Silvia Serra; Lorenzo Camellini
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.