Literature DB >> 25705392

The role of mast cells in cancers.

Thiago T Maciel1, Ivan C Moura1, Olivier Hermine2.   

Abstract

Mast cells are immune cells that accumulate in the tumors and their microenvironment during disease progression. Mast cells are armed with a wide array of receptors that sense environment modifications and, upon stimulation, they are able to secrete several biologically active factors involved in the modulation of tumor growth. For example, mast cells are able to secrete pro-angiogenic and growth factors but also pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. Recent studies have allowed substantial progress in understanding the role of mast cells in tumorigenesis/disease progression but further studies are necessary to completely elucidate their impact in the pathophysiology of cancer. Here we review observations suggesting that mast cells could modulate tumor growth in humans. We also discuss the drawbacks related to observations from mast cell-deficient mouse models, which could have consequences in the determination of a potential causative relationship between mast cells and cancer. We believe that the understanding of the precise role of mast cells in tumor development and progression will be of critical importance for the development of new targeted therapies in human cancers.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25705392      PMCID: PMC4311277          DOI: 10.12703/P7-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Prime Rep        ISSN: 2051-7599


Context

Interaction between cancer cells and their microenvironment are multiple and can result in both progression and arrest of tumor growth [1]. Tumor microenvironment is composed of stromal cells but also of cells from both innate (i.e. neutrophils, macrophages, mast cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells and natural killer lymphocytes) and adaptive (T and B lymphocytes) arms of the immune system. Moreover, lymphocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the major cellular populations present in infiltrates in well-established tumors. In this setting, the extent of type 1 helper (Th1) effector CD8+ cells has been shown to be a marker of clinical response suggesting that, in particular conditions, immune cells can exert anti-tumor effects [2,3]. In contrast to T cells, it has been shown that TAM infiltrates correlate to a poor prognosis in the majority of cancers, but positive associations between TAMs and disease prognosis have been also proposed [4]. Differences in the impact of TAMs in cancer prognosis are probably related to their plasticity, since macrophages can adopt different phenotypes depending on the cellular context [4]. Recently, clinical trials in melanoma patients have shown that the manipulation of tolerance by the combined use of monoclonal antibodies directed against immune-checkpoint inhibitors (i.e. CTLA-4 and PD-1) resulted in effective responses and a proportion of patients presented an improved overall survival [5]. Therefore, immune-modulatory molecules could subvert the complex interactions between tumors and immune cell infiltrates, therefore favoring anti-tumor responses. Mast cells are cells of hematopoietic origin which terminally differentiate and become mature in tissues [6]. They can contribute to both innate and adaptive immune responses and therefore represent potential players in different physiopathological conditions [7,8]. The presence of mast cells at the periphery, but also infiltrating tumors, argues for their role in the modulation of tumor biology [9]. Therefore, the crosstalk between mast cells and other tumor-infiltrating cells appears to be a potential target for anticancer therapies. In this review, we summarize some of the observations about the presence of mast cells in human tumors and the contribution of mouse models to the understanding of the complex relationships between these components of disease pathology.

Mast cell responses to environmental threats

Mast cells are long-lived secretory cells viewed as sentinels, able to rapidly respond to modifications in their environment [8,10,11]. Their ability to respond to extrinsic signals relies on the surface expression of a wide array of receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [12] and Nod-like receptors (NLRs) [13], as well as Fc and complement receptors [14-16]. Upon activation, mast cells have the ability to secrete a wide array of inflammatory mediators. These can be released from pre-stored sources in cytoplasmic granules, such as histamine and unique mast cell proteases, with an immediate effect [17]. Others factors, including prostaglandins, leukotrienes, as well as a whole set of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, are newly synthesized [8,10]. Mast cells can also shift their phenotype depending on the duration of stimuli exposition. For example, it has been shown that an acute activation of the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in mast cells stimulates IgE-dependent mast cell activation resulting in increased histamine secretion, as well as the production of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-13, whereas prolonged exposure to AhR ligands resulted in a shift to IL-17 responses and impaired mast cell degranulation [18,19]. Moreover, mast cells can be presented in different subtypes in accordance with their tissue distribution (e.g. connective tissue-type and mucosal mast cells), which can vary according to the genetic background of individuals resulting in “mast cell plasticity” [9]. Once secreted, mast cell mediators can do the following: (a) initiate tissue and immunological responses; (b) attract inflammatory cells; (c) mediate tissue remodeling and repair [8,10,11,20]. Differences in response lie in the ability of mast cells to secrete pro-inflammatory (mainly tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) or anti-inflammatory (IL-10 and transforming growth factor [TGF-β]) cytokines. For example, mast cells are able to secrete TNF-α and increase antigen presentation by dendritic cells, promoting pro-inflammatory T cell responses and monocyte/macrophage activation [7,8]. However, under specific conditions, mast cells can secrete IL-10 and thus block T cell proliferation [7,8]. Moreover, mast cells can modulate adaptive immunity and angiogenesis [7,21] through the release of cytoplasmic granules and cytokines (mainly IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6) and growth factors (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], TGF-β, fibroblast growth factor-2 [FGF-2], angiopoietin-1). Therefore, mast cells can modulate the intensity of organ injury depending on the pathophysiological context [22]. Although often studied for their effector functions in allergy and asthma [23,24], it has recently been suggested that mast cells have detrimental functions in several other inflammatory conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [25-27]. However, the roles of mast cells in inflammatory diseases have been recently challenged by the use of newly characterized mast cell-deficient mice [28,29].

The role of mast cells in tumors: what can we learn from human studies?

Increased accumulation of mast cells within tumor environments has been correlated with poor prognosis, increased metastasis and reduced survival in several types of human cancer, including melanoma [30], prostate [31], pancreatic adenocarcinoma [32], squamous cell carcinoma [33], Hodgkin lymphoma [34] and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia [35,36]. Tumor cells produce inflammatory mediators and pro-angiogenic factors, including stem cell factor (SCF). SCF is the ligand for CD117, also known as KIT receptor, a tyrosine kinase receptor highly expressed by mast cells [20]. Activation of SCF/Kit pathway is necessary for the maturation, migration and survival of mast cells [37], since they derive from hematopoietic precursors inside the bone marrow and complete their differentiation and maturation within vascularized tissues [38]. The surrounding environment of tumors, through SCF chemotaxis, promotes infiltration and maturation of mast cells, which release angiogenic mediators, proteases and growth factors that support tumor development [39]. It has been demonstrated that FGF-2 and VEGF derived from mast cells trigger an intense angiogenic response in vivo [40]. In agreement, accumulation of mast cells is usually found in the proximity of CD31+ cells and microvessels [32,41]. Mast cells also release proteases within tumor environment. For example, tryptase activates latent metalloproteinases, contributes to extracellular matrix degradation, vascular tube formation and release of trapped angiogenic factors [42], promoting angiogenesis and metastasis. During tumor progression, mast cells also act on recruitment of neutrophils and eosinophils, activation of T and B immune responses [43], and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which accumulate in the tumor microenvironment and correlate with poor prognosis [44]. Therefore, mast cells can exert pro-tumor effects by influencing the microenvironment or, directly, by conditioning the fate of tumor cells including drug resistance. They can promote tumor growth by inducing angiogenesis and promote tissue remodeling through the induction of changes in composition of the extracellular matrix [45]. Mast cells can also promote pro-inflammatory pathways that could result in the impairment of tumor progression [46]. The ability of mast cells to rapidly sense the environment could determine the resultant immune responses to tumors. By their ability to contribute to both innate and adaptive responses, mast cells can therefore modulate the outcome of major immune infiltrates present in tumors (i.e. TAM and lymphocytes). Therefore, we believe that targeting the survival/function of mast cells could influence cancer cells' behavior and therefore the outcome of clinical responses.

Lessons from mouse models

The accumulated knowledge on mast cell biology has been improved substantially with the discovery of mice models with mutations or deletions on c-kit gene (especially WBB6F1-KitW/W-v and C57BL/6-KitW-sh/W-sh), in which mast cell density or activity are significantly reduced [21,29]. Recent publications used rather C57BL/6-KitW-sh/W-sh mice for evaluation of mast cells, mainly because these mice have fewer defects compared to WBB6F1-Kit W/W-v, are fertile, and have normal red blood cell counts [47]. Using C57BL/6-KitW-sh/W-sh mice, Pittoni et al. showed that mast cells (and more specifically mast cell-derived matrix metallopeptidase 9 [MMP-9]) are necessary and sufficient to promote tumor growth in mice subcutaneously grafted with adenocarcinoma cells [48]. Interestingly, pharmacological targeting of mast cell function by sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn) in mice expressing the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) resulted in a paradoxical increase in both the incidence and aggressiveness of tumors, suggesting that environmental mast cells can exert pro- or anti-tumor effects depending on the cellular context [48]. The same experimental approaches were used by Soucek et al. to show that mast cell infiltrates support tumor growth and angiogenesis in a model of Myc-induced pancreatic β-cell tumors [49]. By using models of mice with genetic lesions in mast cell development, Gounaris et al. demonstrated that mast cells can support polyposis formation, which precedes colon cancer development [50]. Moreover, Yang and colleagues have shown that loss of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene in mast cells is required for neurofibroma growth, and that targeting KIT activity by imatinib mesylate decreases tumor development in mice: this strategy was effective in the treatment of a young neurofibromatosis patient [51]. In addition to these discussed models, mast cells have been shown to play a harmful role on other types of tumors, including B16F10 melanoma, dimethylhydrazine (DMH) induced colonic epithelial neoplasms, M B49 bladder carcinoma cells and T-cell lymphoma EL4 cells [52-55]. Altogether, the use of mouse models of impaired KIT function have contributed to our better understanding of the role of mast cells on tumor biology, with experimental evidence that mast cells contribute to metastasis, malignant neovascularization and release of pro-angiogenic proteases and growth factors [9]. Therefore, this evidence suggests that mast cells may support tumor growth from different cellular origins, suggesting that targeting mast cell functions could be a therapeutic option in cancer treatment either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Recently, Puwar et al. showed that recombinant IL-9 (rIL-9) displays a highly potent anti-tumor effect both in melanoma and lung carcinoma models and that this effect is lost in C57BL/6-KitW-sh/W-sh mice [56], suggesting mast cells are required for the therapeutic efficacy of rIL-9, and opening new perspectives in the understanding of the mast cell function in tumors. However, further studies will be necessary to better elucidate the complexity of mast cell functions in tumor biology. Results obtained with KIT-dependent mast cell-deficient mice should be viewed with caution, since these mice also present other abnormalities related to c-kit mutations, which may affect other cells involved in tumor progression (including natural killer [NK] and dendritic cells) [57,58]. Recently, several new mouse models have been published, aiming to abolish mast cells without impairment of KIT function [28,29,59,60]. These experimental models could help to better elucidate the role of mast cells in tumor progression. However, these models also have drawbacks, since the abnormalities are not exclusively specific to mast cells. Moreover, to date there are no pharmacological compounds able to target mast cells specifically [9].

Concluding remarks

To date the role of mast cells in tumors has been largely ignored. This is particularly due to the debatable evidence of a causal relationship between mast cell infiltrates and tumor progression in humans. In addition, the use of mast cell-deficient models has been recently challenged by the characterization of new specific models of mast cell ablation [21,29]. Therefore, the role of mast cell infiltrates in tumors is still unclear and merits particular attention. Unveiling complex interactions between mast cells, microenvironment and tumors could provide insights into the understanding of disease pathogenesis. This may open new avenues in expanding the arsenal of targeted therapies aiming to induce tumor growth arrest and tumor cell response to chemotherapy.
  60 in total

1.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive, regulators of immunity.

Authors:  Stephen J Galli; Michele Grimbaldeston; Mindy Tsai
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens.

Authors:  Anne Dudeck; Jan Dudeck; Julia Scholten; Anke Petzold; Sangeetha Surianarayanan; Anja Köhler; Katrin Peschke; David Vöhringer; Claudia Waskow; Thomas Krieg; Werner Müller; Ari Waisman; Karin Hartmann; Matthias Gunzer; Axel Roers
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  The prognostic relevance of angiogenesis and mast cells in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  G O Elpek; T Gelen; N H Aksoy; A Erdoğan; L Dertsiz; A Demircan; N Keleş
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not be ignored.

Authors:  F Pagès; J Galon; M-C Dieu-Nosjean; E Tartour; C Sautès-Fridman; W-H Fridman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Novel mode of action of c-kit tyrosine kinase inhibitors leading to NK cell-dependent antitumor effects.

Authors:  Christophe Borg; Magali Terme; Julien Taïeb; Cédric Ménard; Caroline Flament; Caroline Robert; Koji Maruyama; Hiro Wakasugi; Eric Angevin; Kris Thielemans; Axel Le Cesne; Véronique Chung-Scott; Vladimir Lazar; Isabelle Tchou; Florent Crépineau; François Lemoine; Jacky Bernard; Jonhantan A Fletcher; Ali Turhan; Jean-Yves Blay; Alain Spatz; Jean-François Emile; Michael C Heinrich; Salah Mécheri; Thomas Tursz; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Regulation of human mast cell and basophil function by anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a.

Authors:  Hydar Ali
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 8.  New models for analyzing mast cell functions in vivo.

Authors:  Laurent L Reber; Thomas Marichal; Stephen J Galli
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 16.687

9.  Human mast cells produce type VIII collagen in vivo.

Authors:  B Rüger; P R Dunbar; Q Hasan; H Sawada; R Kittelberger; N Greenhill; T J Neale
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Harriet Kluger; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Naiyer A Rizvi; Alexander M Lesokhin; Neil H Segal; Charlotte E Ariyan; Ruth-Ann Gordon; Kathleen Reed; Matthew M Burke; Anne Caldwell; Stephanie A Kronenberg; Blessing U Agunwamba; Xiaoling Zhang; Israel Lowy; Hector David Inzunza; William Feely; Christine E Horak; Quan Hong; Alan J Korman; Jon M Wigginton; Ashok Gupta; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  45 in total

1.  Di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Dp44mT), an anticancer agent, exerts an anti-inflammatory effect in activated human mast cells.

Authors:  Sun-Young Nam; Na-Ra Han; Kyoung Wan Yoon; Hyung-Min Kim; Hyun-Ja Jeong
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.575

2.  mRNA regulation: A patch for a splice.

Authors:  Benjamin L Miller
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  Deep exploration of the immune infiltrate and outcome prediction in testicular cancer by quantitative multiplexed immunohistochemistry and gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Peter J Siska; Romany A N Johnpulle; Alice Zhou; Jennifer Bordeaux; Ju Young Kim; Bashar Dabbas; Naveen Dakappagari; Jeffrey C Rathmell; W Kimryn Rathmell; Alicia K Morgans; Justin M Balko; Douglas B Johnson
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  A comparative study of Ki-67 antigen expression between luminal A and triple-negative subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Umbelina Soares Borges; Danylo Rafhael Costa-Silva; João Paulo da Silva-Sampaio; Carla Solange Escórcio-Dourado; Airton Mendes Conde; Viriato Campelo; Luiz Henrique Gebrim; Benedito Borges da Silva; Pedro Vitor Lopes-Costa
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Targeting tumor-resident mast cells for effective anti-melanoma immune responses.

Authors:  Susanne Kaesler; Florian Wölbing; Wolfgang Eberhard Kempf; Yuliya Skabytska; Martin Köberle; Thomas Volz; Tobias Sinnberg; Teresa Amaral; Sigrid Möckel; Amir Yazdi; Gisela Metzler; Martin Schaller; Karin Hartmann; Benjamin Weide; Claus Garbe; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Martin Röcken; Tilo Biedermann
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-10-03

Review 6.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and the Hallmarks of Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole Wagner; Kay-Dietrich Wagner
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  Identification and Characterization of Tunneling Nanotubes Involved in Human Mast Cell FcεRI-Mediated Apoptosis of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Elnaz Ahani; Mohammad Fereydouni; Mona Motaghed; Christopher L Kepley
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Mast Cell-Targeted Strategies in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Michele Ammendola; Rosario Sacco; Giuseppe Sammarco; Maria Luposella; Rosa Patruno; Cosmo Damiano Gadaleta; Giovambattista De Sarro; Girolamo Ranieri
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  T-independent response mediated by oncolytic tanapoxvirus recombinants expressing interleukin-2 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 suppresses human triple negative breast tumors.

Authors:  Yogesh R Suryawanashi; Tiantian Zhang; Helene M Woyczesczyk; John Christie; Emily Byers; Steven Kohler; Robert Eversole; Charles Mackenzie; Karim Essani
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  Tumor-Associated Mast Cells in Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Carla Visciano; Nella Prevete; Federica Liotti; Gianni Marone
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.