Literature DB >> 12400808

Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization.

Nicolas Doll1, Michael A Borger, Joerg Hain, Jan Bucerius, Thomas Walther, Jan F Gummert, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: We reviewed prospectively gathered data on all patients who were undergoing first-time AVR, with or without replacement of the ascending aorta, over a 1-year period at our institution.
RESULTS: A total of 176 patients underwent minimal access and 258 underwent conventional AVR. The conventional group was older, had more incidence of diabetes, and more aortic stenosis (all p < 0.05). Eight minimal access AVR patients (2%) required conversion to a complete sternotomy. Minimal access AVR patients had longer aortic crossclamp times than conventional AVR patients (60 +/- 22 vs 55 +/- 23 minutes, p = 0.03) but similar CPB times (93 +/- 38 vs 88 +/- 42 minutes, p = 0.20). Postoperative creatine kinase-MB levels were similar for the two groups. Total postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimal access group, and these patients received less red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma transfusions. Minimal access AVR patients were less likely to have postoperative respiratory failure (3% vs 10%); they had shorter intensive care unit stays (3.7 +/- 5.4 vs 4.5 +/- 5.6 days) and shorter hospital stays (10 +/- 6 vs 12 +/- 7 days, all p < 0.05). Mortality was lower in patients undergoing minimal access surgery (3% vs 9%, p = 0.008) by univariate analysis. Multivariate predictors of mortality were age, hypertension, and CPB time.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patient selection may have influenced some of the observed differences between our patient groups, minimal access surgery appears to be associated with decreased morbidity and resource use when compared to conventional AVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12400808     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03911-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  24 in total

Review 1.  Minimal access aortic valve replacement via limited skin incision and complete median sternotomy.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Umberto Benedetto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Aortic valve replacement through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Umberto Benedetto; Mohamed Amrani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Minimally invasive primary aortic valve surgery: the OLV Aalst experience.

Authors:  Johan van der Merwe; Filip Casselman; Bernard Stockman; Frank Van Praet; Roel Beelen; Lieven Maene; Yvette Vermeulen; Ivan Degrieck
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the "Miami Method".

Authors:  Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 5.  Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options.

Authors:  Basel Ramlawi; Kareem Bedeir; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Mahmoud Diab; Christoph Sponholz; Michael Bauer; Gloria Färber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis.

Authors:  J Trent Magruder; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Todd Crawford; John V Conte; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 8.  Minimal-access median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Luciani; Gianluca Lucchese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience.

Authors:  Sven Lehmann; Denis R Merk; Christian D Etz; Joerg Seeburger; Thomas Schroeter; Andreas Oberbach; Madlen Uhlemann; Robert Hoellriegel; Martin Haensig; Sergey Leontyev; Jens Garbade; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 10.  Advances in the management of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; S Bargenda; D Sugrue; J Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.