Literature DB >> 23058665

One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

Alfred A Kocher1, Günther Laufer, Axel Haverich, Malakh Shrestha, Thomas Walther, Martin Misfeld, Joerg Kempfert, Linda Gillam, Christoph Schmitz, Thorsten C Wahlers, Jens Wippermann, Friedrich W Mohr, Matthias Roth, Adalbert Skwara, Parwis Rahmanian, Dominik Wiedemann, Michael A Borger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A new class of rapid-deployment aortic valves has emerged with the potential to simplify minimally invasive aortic surgery and reduce crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. We report the 1-year clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial.
METHODS: Seventeen surgeons from 6 European centers treated 152 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement in a prospective, single-arm trial. A stented trileaflet bovine pericardial bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable, cloth-covered stent frame at the inflow aspect was implanted in 146 patients (mean age, 75.5 ± 6.7 years; 52.7% were female). Five valve sizes were evaluated (19-27 mm); 58.9% of cases had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 41.1% of cases involved concomitant procedures. Minimally invasive surgical approaches occurred in 48.8% of the isolated aortic valve replacements. Patients were followed at discharge, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Implantation success was 96.1% (146/152), early valve-related mortality was 1.4% (2/146), and cumulative survival was 92.5% at a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.1 months. Crossclamp time for isolated aortic valve replacement was 41.1 ± 10.6 minutes. Independent core laboratory-adjudicated mean effective orifice area and aortic valve pressure gradient were 1.7 ± 0.2 cm(2) and 8.8 ± 3.0 mm Hg at 3 months, and 1.7 ± 0.2 cm(2) and 8.4 ± 3.4 mm Hg at 1 year, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System is feasible, safe, and efficacious for aortic valve replacement. Aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were reduced compared with those for conventional aortic valve replacement. Early hemodynamic performance was excellent and remained so up to 1 year.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23058665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  44 in total

1.  Reoperation for aortic homograft failure using an Edwards Intuity valve.

Authors:  Gianluca Folesani; Giovanni Calcara; Giuseppe Minniti; Elvio Polesel
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Do we need sutureless or self-anchoring aortic valve prostheses?

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

3.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SU-AVR-IR): design and rationale from the International Valvular Surgery Study Group (IVSSG).

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry Folliguet; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Francesco Alamanni; Alberto Albertini; Gopal Bhatnagar; Michel Carrier; Stephen Clark; Federic Collart; Utz Kappert; Alfred Kocher; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Ahmed Ouda; Marc Pelletier; Parwis Baradaran Rahmanian; David Reineke; Kevin Teoh; Giovanni Troise; Emmanuel Villa; Thorsten Wahlers; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Miceli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

6.  A mechanistic investigation of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve's hemodynamic performance.

Authors:  Vahid Sadri; Charles H Bloodworth; Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Intuity™ aortic valve thrombosis.

Authors:  Martina Krajnc; Matevz Jan; Katja Azman Juvan; Tomislav Klokocovnik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 8.  [Surgical treatment of aortic valve stenosis].

Authors:  O J Liakopoulos; J Merkle; T Wahlers; Y-H Choi
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Surgical Approaches to Aortic Valve Replacement and Repair-Insights and Challenges.

Authors:  Basel Ramlawi; Mahesh Ramchandani; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

10.  Conventional versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a single-centre comparison between the Edwards Magna valve and its rapid-deployment successor.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Stephanie Wallner; Andreas Habertheuer; Claus Rath; Martin Schauperl; Thomas Binder; Dietrich Beitzke; Raphael Rosenhek; Christian Loewe; Dominik Wiedemann; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.