Literature DB >> 25694973

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Mattia Glauber1, Matteo Ferrarini1, Antonio Miceli1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is defined as an aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedure that involves a small chest wall incision as opposed to conventional full sternotomy (FS). The MIAVR approach is increasingly being used with the aim of reducing the "invasiveness" of the surgical procedure, while maintaining the same efficacy, quality and safety of a conventional approach. The most common MIAVR techniques are ministernotomy (MS) and right anterior minithoracotomy (RT) approaches. Compared with conventional surgery, MIAVR has been shown to reduce postoperative mortality and morbidity, providing faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetics results, requires less rehabilitations resources and consequently cost reduction. Despite these advantages, MIAVR is limited by the longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, which have raised some concerns in fragile and high risk patients. However, with the introduction of sutureless and fast deployment valves, operative times have dramatically reduced by 35-40%, standardizing this procedure. According to these results, the MIAVR approach using sutureless valves may be the "real alternative" to the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures in high risk patients "operable" patients. Prospective randomized trials are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive; aortic valve replacement (AVR); sutureless valve

Year:  2015        PMID: 25694973      PMCID: PMC4311160          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.01.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  33 in total

1.  Minimally invasive valve surgery versus the conventional approach.

Authors:  D A Cooley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations.

Authors:  D M Cosgrove; J F Sabik
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.

Authors:  Susheel K Kodali; Mathew R Williams; Craig R Smith; Lars G Svensson; John G Webb; Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Todd M Dewey; Vinod H Thourani; Augusto D Pichard; Michael Fischbein; Wilson Y Szeto; Scott Lim; Kevin L Greason; Paul S Teirstein; S Chris Malaisrie; Pamela S Douglas; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian Whisenant; Alan Zajarias; Duolao Wang; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Martin B Leon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers.

Authors:  Antonio Miceli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Michele Murzi; Daniyar Gilmanov; Giovanni Concistré; Eugenio Quaini; Marco Solinas; Theodor Fischlein; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

Authors:  Alfred A Kocher; Günther Laufer; Axel Haverich; Malakh Shrestha; Thomas Walther; Martin Misfeld; Joerg Kempfert; Linda Gillam; Christoph Schmitz; Thorsten C Wahlers; Jens Wippermann; Friedrich W Mohr; Matthias Roth; Adalbert Skwara; Parwis Rahmanian; Dominik Wiedemann; Michael A Borger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Michele Murzi; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stefano Bevilacqua; Danyar Gilmanov; Pierandrea Farneti; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Praveen Indraratna; Su C Ang; Hemal Gada; Tristan D Yan; Con Manganas; Paul Bannon; Christopher Cao
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Jürgen Jessl; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Francesco Pollari; Matthias Pauschinger; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Su C Ang; Praveen Indraratna; Con Manganas; Paul Bannon; Deborah Black; David Tian; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Parnell; M Prince
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 2.  Cardiac surgery using a single thoracic port-current status and future directions.

Authors:  Javier Gallego-Poveda; Nuno Carvalho Guerra; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Catarina Carvalheiro; Hugo Ferreira; André Sena; Nádia Junqueira; Tiago Rodrigues Velho; Ângelo Nobre
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-11-02

4.  Long-term outcomes of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Andrew A Mamo; David H Tian; Utz Kappert; Manuel Wilbring; Thierry Folliguet; Antonio Fiore; Antonio Miceli; Augusto D'Onofrio; Giorgia Cibin; Gino Gerosa; Mattia Glauber; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

5.  Low-Risk Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Milos M Jovanovic; Slobodan V Micovic; Miodrag S Peric; Igor S Zivkovic; Stasa D Krasic; Ognjen S Milicevic; Stefan P Stankovic; Petar M Vukovic
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-01-01

6.  Experimental Study and Early Clinical Application Of a Sutureless Aortic Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Walter J Gomes; João Carlos Leal; Fabio Biscegli Jatene; Nelson A Hossne; Renata Gabaldi; Glaucia Basso Frazzato; Guilherme Agreli; Domingo M Braile
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

7.  Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Pascal Leprince; Max Gassmann; Peiman Jamshidi; Nassrin Yamani; Julien Amour; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Anatomical circumstances and aortic cross-clamp time in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jure Jug; Zdravko Štor; Borut Geršak
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

Review 9.  Recent advances in aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Adhami; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-20

10.  Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Massimo Meco; Andrea Montisci; Antonio Miceli; Paolo Panisi; Francesco Donatelli; Silvia Cirri; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Lio; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.