Literature DB >> 33236100

Anatomical circumstances and aortic cross-clamp time in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Jure Jug1, Zdravko Štor2, Borut Geršak1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prolonged operative times, potentially leading to increased morbidity, are a possible drawback of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of anatomical circumstances in the chest on aortic cross-clamp time.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 patients who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless valve via right-anterior thoracotomy or with ministernotomy. Anatomical variables were measured during preoperative computer tomography scans.
RESULTS: Aortic cross-clamp time was shorter in those having ministernotomy than in the right-anterior thoracotomy group (41.1 vs 52.3 min; P < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.09). A multivariable linear-regression model (P = 0.018) showed the aortic dextroposition variable to be a significant predictor of the aortic cross-clamp method and CPB times (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003) independent of other anatomical variables in the right thoracotomy group (10 mm deviation from optimal position prolonged the times for 240 and 600 s). For the whole cohort, a correlation between aortic valve dimensions and operative times was found (P = 0.046, P = 0.009). A linear-regression model (P = 0.046) predicted 90 s longer aortic cross-clamp time and 231 s longer CPB time for every 1 mm smaller aortic valve diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical variables are associated with the operative times in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless valves. Considering this association, preplanning the procedure is recommended.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Computed tomography; Minimally invasive surgery; Myocardial protection; Sutureless

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33236100      PMCID: PMC8759473          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  27 in total

1.  Relation between aortic cross-clamp time and mortality--not as straightforward as expected.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Michael A Borger; Richard D Weisel; Terrence M Yau; Manjula Maganti; Vivek Rao
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Utility of spiral CT in minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  R Ammar; E Porat; D S Eisenberg; G Uretzky
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Outcomes of minimally invasive valve surgery versus standard sternotomy in obese patients undergoing isolated valve surgery.

Authors:  Orlando Santana; Javier Reyna; Robert Grana; Mauricio Buendia; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Antonio Miceli; Daniyar Gilmanov; Michele Murzi; Federica Marchi; Matteo Ferrarini; Alfredo G Cerillo; Eugenio Quaini; Marco Solinas; Sergio Berti; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Prolonged Cross-Clamping During Aortic Valve Replacement Is an Independent Predictor of Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality: Analysis of the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database.

Authors:  Kenji Iino; Hiroaki Miyata; Noboru Motomura; Go Watanabe; Shigeyuki Tomita; Hirofumi Takemura; Shinichi Takamoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Furukawa; Oliver Kuss; Anas Aboud; Michael Schönbrodt; Andre Renner; Kavous Hakim Meibodi; Tobias Becker; Amin Zittermann; Jan F Gummert; Jochen Börgermann
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future?

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Ilona Maeding; Klaus Höffler; Nurbol Koigeldiyev; Georg Marsch; Thierry Siemeni; Felix Fleissner; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-12

8.  Tolerance to ischemia and hypoxia is reduced in aged human myocardium.

Authors:  J Mariani; R Ou; M Bailey; M Rowland; P Nagley; F Rosenfeldt; S Pepe
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study.

Authors:  Domenico Paparella; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Giuseppe Santarpino; Marco Moscarelli; Piero Guida; Khalil Fattouch; Vito Margari; Luigi Martinelli; Alberto Albertini; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement: associations of radiological assessments with procedure complexity.

Authors:  Bruce R Boti; Vikash G Hindori; Emilio L Schade; Athina M Kougioumtzoglou; Eva C Verbeek; Annet Driessen-Waaijer; Riccardo Cocchieri; Bas A J M de Mol; Nils R Planken; Abdullah Kaya; Henk A Marquering
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Aleksander Dokollari; Basel Ramlawi; Gianluca Torregrossa; Michel Pompeu Sá; Serge Sicouri; Edvin Prifti; Sandro Gelsomino; Massimo Bonacchi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.