Nasimeh Vatandoost1, Jahanafrooz Ghanbari1, Mahboobeh Mojaver1, Amir Avan2, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan3, Reza Nedaeinia4, Rasoul Salehi5. 1. Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 2. Molecular Medicine Group, Department of Modern Sciences and Technologies, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 3. Biochemistry of Nutrition Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 4. Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 5. Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. r_salehi@med.mui.ac.ir.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major health problems worldwide and is often diagnosed at late stage. There is growing body of evidence in early detection of this disease with novel screening modalities to reduce compliance and increase specificity of available methods. The aim of current review is to give an overview on currently available screening methods (e.g., fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy), with their own merits and disadvantages, and new genetic/epigenetic/protein markers, as novel screening modalities. RESULT: There are several serum and fecal biomarkers that can predict CRC and polyps. Overall sensitivities for detection by fecal DNA markers ranged from 53 to 87%, while a panel of serum protein markers provides a sensitivity/specificity up to 85% for CRC. In particular, DNA methylation markers (e.g., SEPT9, SFRP2, and ALX4), circulating microRNAs (e.g., microRNA21), SNPs in microRNAs binding site (e.g., rs4596 located within a target region of the predicted miR-518a-5p and miR-527), protein markers (e.g., carcinoembryonic antigen, N-methyltransferase), or microsatellites instability in tumors with deficient mismatch repair of some genes are among the most interesting and promising biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Increasing evidence supports the use of combined fecal and serum biomarkers with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy screening in order to maximize the benefits and reduce the number of false-positive tests and patients undergoing invasive methods, which in turn could overcome the limitations of the current screening methods for early detection of CRC and adenomas.
PURPOSE:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the major health problems worldwide and is often diagnosed at late stage. There is growing body of evidence in early detection of this disease with novel screening modalities to reduce compliance and increase specificity of available methods. The aim of current review is to give an overview on currently available screening methods (e.g., fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy), with their own merits and disadvantages, and new genetic/epigenetic/protein markers, as novel screening modalities. RESULT: There are several serum and fecal biomarkers that can predict CRC and polyps. Overall sensitivities for detection by fecal DNA markers ranged from 53 to 87%, while a panel of serum protein markers provides a sensitivity/specificity up to 85% for CRC. In particular, DNA methylation markers (e.g., SEPT9, SFRP2, and ALX4), circulating microRNAs (e.g., microRNA21), SNPs in microRNAs binding site (e.g., rs4596 located within a target region of the predicted miR-518a-5p and miR-527), protein markers (e.g., carcinoembryonic antigen, N-methyltransferase), or microsatellites instability in tumors with deficient mismatch repair of some genes are among the most interesting and promising biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Increasing evidence supports the use of combined fecal and serum biomarkers with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy screening in order to maximize the benefits and reduce the number of false-positive tests and patients undergoing invasive methods, which in turn could overcome the limitations of the current screening methods for early detection of CRC and adenomas.
Authors: S M Dong; G Traverso; C Johnson; L Geng; R Favis; K Boynton; K Hibi; S N Goodman; M D'Allessio; P Paty; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; F Barany; B Levin; A Shuber; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein; J Jen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-06-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Steven Itzkowitz; Randall Brand; Lina Jandorf; Kris Durkee; John Millholland; Linda Rabeneck; Paul C Schroy; Stephen Sontag; David Johnson; Sanford Markowitz; Lawrence Paszat; Barry M Berger Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Chung Wah Wu; Siew Chien Ng; Yujuan Dong; Linwei Tian; Simon Siu Man Ng; Wing Wa Leung; Wai Tak Law; Tung On Yau; Francis Ka Leung Chan; Joseph Jao Yiu Sung; Jun Yu Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Caitlin M Race; Lydia E Kwon; Myles T Foreman; Qinglan Huang; Hakan Inan; Sailaja Kesiraju; Phuong Le; Sung Jun Lim; Andrew M Smith; Richard C Zangar; Utkan Demirci; Karen S Anderson; Brian T Cunningham Journal: IEEE Sens J Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 3.301
Authors: Orsolya Galamb; Alexandra Kalmár; Bálint Péterfia; István Csabai; András Bodor; Dezső Ribli; Tibor Krenács; Árpád V Patai; Barnabás Wichmann; Barbara Kinga Barták; Kinga Tóth; Gábor Valcz; Sándor Spisák; Zsolt Tulassay; Béla Molnár Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: R Nedaeinia; M Sharifi; A Avan; M Kazemi; L Rafiee; M Ghayour-Mobarhan; R Salehi Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Frank L Meyskens; Hasan Mukhtar; Cheryl L Rock; Jack Cuzick; Thomas W Kensler; Chung S Yang; Scott D Ramsey; Scott M Lippman; David S Alberts Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Muhammad Tarek Abdel Ghafar; Fatma Gharib; Sherief Abdel-Salam; Reham Abdelkader Elkhouly; Ahmed Elshora; Khaled H Shalaby; Dina El-Guindy; Mohamed Ali El-Rashidy; Nema A Soliman; Mira Maged Abu-Elenin; Alzahraa A Allam Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2020-02-22 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Thais S Sabedot; Tathiane M Malta; James Snyder; Kevin Nelson; Michael Wells; Ana C deCarvalho; Abir Mukherjee; Dhananjay A Chitale; Maritza S Mosella; Artem Sokolov; Karam P Asmaro; Adam Robin; Mark L Rosenblum; Tom Mikkelsen; Jack Rock; Laila M Poisson; Ian Lee; Tobias Walbert; Steven Kalkanis; Antonio Iavarone; Ana Valeria Castro; Houtan Noushmehr Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 12.300