Literature DB >> 11390535

Detecting colorectal cancer in stool with the use of multiple genetic targets.

S M Dong1, G Traverso, C Johnson, L Geng, R Favis, K Boynton, K Hibi, S N Goodman, M D'Allessio, P Paty, S R Hamilton, D Sidransky, F Barany, B Levin, A Shuber, K W Kinzler, B Vogelstein, J Jen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer cells are shed into the stool, providing a potential means for the early detection of the disease using noninvasive approaches. Our goal was to develop reliable, specific molecular genetic tests for the detection of colorectal cancer in stool samples.
METHODS: Stool DNA was isolated from paired stools and primary tumor samples from 51 colorectal cancer patients. Three genetic targets-TP53, BAT26, and K-RAS-were used to detect tumor-associated mutations in the stool prior to or without regard to the molecular analyses of the paired tumors. TP53 gene mutations were detected with a mismatch-ligation assay that detects nine common p53 gene mutations. Deletions within the BAT26 locus were detected by a modified solid-phase minisequencing method. Mutations in codons 12 and 13 of K-RAS were detected with a digital polymerase chain reaction-based method.
RESULTS: TP53 gene mutations were detected in the tumor DNA of 30 patients, all of whom had the identical TP53 mutation in their stools. Tumors from three patients contained a noninherited deletion at the BAT26 locus, and the same alterations were identified in these patients' stool specimens. Nineteen of 50 tumors tested had a K-RAS mutation; identical mutations were detected in the paired stool DNA samples from eight patients. In no case was a mutation found in stool that was not also present in the primary tumor. Thus, the three genetic markers together detected 36 (71%) of 51 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 56% to 83%) with colorectal cancer and 36 (92%) of 39 patients (95% CI = 79% to 98%) whose tumors had an alteration.
CONCLUSION: We were able to detect the majority of colorectal cancers by analyzing stool DNA for just three genetic markers. Additional work is needed to determine the specificity of these genetic tests for detecting colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients and to more precisely estimate the prevalence of the mutations and sensitivity of the assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11390535     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.11.858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  67 in total

1.  [Conventional and molecular screening (fecal tests)].

Authors:  C Pox; K Schulmann; W Schmiegel
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Translational genomics: the challenge of developing cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  James D Brooks
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Is stool DNA multitarget testing an unreliable strategy for colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  G Ferretti; E Bria; P Carlini; A Felici; D Giannarelli; F Cuppone; P Papaldo; C Nisticò; A Fabi; A Gelibter; E Terzoli; F Cognetti
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  [Molecular therapy in gastroenterology and hepatology].

Authors:  J Wedemeyer; N P Malek; M P Manns; M J Bahr
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant.

Authors:  James E Allison; Michael Lawson
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Stool-based DNA testing, a new noninvasive method for colorectal cancer screening, the first report from Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan; Alireza Tavasoli; Arash Velayati; Hamid Reza Sima; Hassan Vosooghinia; Mehdi Farzadnia; Hamid Asadzedeh; Mehran Gholamin; Ezzat Dadkhah; Azadeh Aarabi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  GNAS sequencing identifies IPMN-specific mutations in a subgroup of diminutive pancreatic cysts referred to as "incipient IPMNs".

Authors:  Hanno Matthaei; Jian Wu; Marco Dal Molin; Chanjuan Shi; Sven Perner; Glen Kristiansen; Philipp Lingohr; Jörg C Kalff; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Analysis of microsatellite instability in stool DNA of patients with colorectal cancer using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Seok-Byung Lim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Il-Jin Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Hee Jin Chang; Hyo Seong Choi; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hio Chung Kang; Yong Shin; Sang-Geun Jang; Jae-Hyun Park; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.