Literature DB >> 18759824

A simplified, noninvasive stool DNA test for colorectal cancer detection.

Steven Itzkowitz1, Randall Brand, Lina Jandorf, Kris Durkee, John Millholland, Linda Rabeneck, Paul C Schroy, Stephen Sontag, David Johnson, Sanford Markowitz, Lawrence Paszat, Barry M Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test, a multi-marker first generation stool DNA (sDNA V 1.0) test is superior to guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests. An improved sDNA assay (version 2), utilizing only two markers, hypermethylated vimentin gene (hV) and a two site DNA integrity assay (DY), demonstrated in a training set (phase 1a) an even higher sensitivity (88%) for CRC with a specificity of 82%. AIM: To validate in an independent set of patients (phase 1b) the sensitivity and specificity of sDNA version 2 for CRC.
METHODS: Forty-two patients with CRC and 241 subjects with normal colonoscopy (NC) provided stool samples, to which they immediately added DNA stabilizing buffer, and mailed their specimen to the laboratory. DNA was purified using gel-based capture, and analyzed for hV and DY using methods identical to those previously published.
RESULTS: Using the same cutpoints as the 1a training set (N = 162; 40 CRCs, 122 normals), hV demonstrated a higher and DY a slightly lower sensitivity, for a combined sensitivity of hV + DY of 86%. Optimal cutpoints based on the combined phase 1a + 1b dataset (N = 445; 82 CRCs, 363 normals) yielded a CRC sensitivity of 83%. The vast majority of cancers were detected regardless of tumor stage, tumor location, or patient age. Assay specificity in the phase 1b dataset for hV, DY, and hV + DY was 82%, 85%, and 73%, respectively, using the phase 1a cutpoints. Optimal cutpoints based on the combined phase 1a + 1b dataset yield a specificity of 82%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides validation of a simplified, improved sDNA test that incorporates only two markers and that demonstrates high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (82%) for CRC. Test performance is highly reproducible in a large set of patients. The use of only two markers will make the test easier to perform, reduce the cost, and facilitate distribution to local laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18759824     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  54 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Screening for colorectal cancer: established and emerging modalities.

Authors:  Nikhil Pawa; Tan Arulampalam; John D Norton
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Epigenetics and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Valinluck Lao; William M Grady
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Aberrant vimentin methylation is characteristic of upper gastrointestinal pathologies.

Authors:  Helen Moinova; Rom S Leidner; Lakshmeswari Ravi; James Lutterbaugh; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Yanwen Chen; Amitabh Chak; Sanford D Markowitz; Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Molecular alterations and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  William M Grady; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 6.  Advances in epigenetic biomarker research in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Ye-Ye Kuang; Xiao-Tong Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A simplified, non-invasive fecal-based DNA integrity assay and iFOBT for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Murugan Kalimutho; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Micaela Cretella; Elena Mannisi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Amanda Formosa; Francesco Pallone; Giorgio Federici; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Molecular origins of cancer: Molecular basis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sanford D Markowitz; Monica M Bertagnolli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A cohort study of STMN1 expression in colorectal cancer: body mass index and prognosis.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yoshifumi Baba; Shoko Kure; Kaori Shima; Natsumi Irahara; Saori Toyoda; Li Chen; Gregory J Kirkner; Brian M Wolpin; Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Limitations in SELDI-TOF MS whole serum proteomic profiling with IMAC surface to specifically detect colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Jing Shen; Zhen-fu Li; Jian-zheng Jie; Wen-yue Wang; Jin Wang; Zhong-tao Zhang; Zhi-xia Li; Li Yan; Jin Gu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.