Literature DB >> 17136645

Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.

R Schulz-Wendtland1, E Wenkel, M Lell, C Böhner, W A Bautz, T Mertelmeier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity of conventional two-dimensional (2D) projection imaging with tomosynthesis with respect to the detectability of mammographic phantom lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a breast tomosynthesis prototype based on a commercial FFDM system (Siemens MAMMOMAT Novation), but modified for a wide angle tube motion and equipped with a fast read-out amorphous selenium detector, we acquired standard 2D images and tomosynthesis series of projection views. We used the Wisconsin mammographic random phantom, model RMI 152A. The anode filter combinations Mo/Mo and W/Rh at two different doses were used as typical radiographic techniques. Slice images through the phantom parallel to the detector were reconstructed with a distance of 1 mm employing a filtered back-projection algorithm. The image data sets were read by five radiologists and evaluated with respect to the detectability of the phantom details.
RESULTS: For all studied radiographic techniques, the detection rate in the tomosynthesis mode was 100 %, i. e. 75 true positive findings out of 75 possible hits. In contrast, the conventional projection mode yielded a detection rate between 80 and 93 % (corresponding to 60 and 70 detected details) depending on the dose and X-ray spectrum.
CONCLUSION: Tomosynthesis has the potential to increase the sensitivity of digital mammography. Overlapping structures from out-of-plane tissue can be removed in the tomosynthesis reconstruction process, thereby enhancing the diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17136645     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis : technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; M P Lux; E Wenkel; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; T Wacker; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Use of Tomosynthesis in Intraoperative Digital Specimen Radiography - Is a Reduction of Breast Re-excision Rates Possible?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M R Bani; M P Lux; M Meier-Meitinger; E Wenkel; S Schwab; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Adamietz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; D L Wachter; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Evaluation of a Marker Clip System in Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer Localization Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; M R Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M G Schrauder; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Brehm; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulosa; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.