Literature DB >> 17013595

Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Matthew Wallis1, Anne Tardivon, Anne Tarvidon, Thomas Helbich, Ingrid Schreer.   

Abstract

The aim of the breast team is to obtain a definitive, nonoperative diagnosis of all potential breast abnormalities in a timely and cost-effective way. Percutaneous needle biopsy with its high sensitivity and specificity should now be standard practice, removing the need for open surgical biopsy or frozen section. For patients with cancer, needle biopsy provides a cost-effective and rapid way of providing not only a definitive diagnosis but prognostic information, allowing prompt discussion of treatment options, be they surgical or medical. Early removal of uncertainty also allows better psychosocial adjustment to the disease. Patients with benign conditions found either by themselves or as a result of population or opportunistic screening can be promptly reassured and discharged, removing the health care and psychological costs of surgical biopsy or repeated follow-up. Radiologists involved in breast imaging should ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out core biopsy and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) under all forms of image guidance. This paper provides guidelines on best practice for diagnostic interventional breast procedures and standards, against which all practitioners should audit themselves, from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17013595     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0408-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  63 in total

1.  Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: how many cases are enough?

Authors:  L Liberman; C L Benton; D D Dershaw; A F Abramson; L R LaTrenta; E A Morris
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Imprint cytology from ultrasound-guided core biopsies: accurate and immediate diagnosis in a one-stop breast clinic.

Authors:  L Jones; M F Lott; C J Calder; E Kutt
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Preoperative core needle biopsy as an independent risk factor for wound infection after breast surgery.

Authors:  Armin Witt; Devrim Yavuz; Christoph Walchetseder; Heinz Strohmer; Ernst Kubista
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Fine needle aspiration cytology as an adjunct to core biopsy in the assessment of symptomatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S Pilgrim; D Ravichandran
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  L Liberman; W P Evans; D D Dershaw; L E Hann; B M Deutch; A F Abramson; P P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy.

Authors:  L Liberman; L E Hann; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson; P P Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer.

Authors:  E E Deurloo; P J Tanis; K G A Gilhuijs; S H Muller; R Kröger; J L Peterse; E J Th Rutgers; R Valdés Olmos; L J Schultze Kool
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of breast lumps: comparison study between pre- and post-operative histological diagnosis.

Authors:  O T Abu-Salem
Journal:  Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis       Date:  2002

9.  Fourteen-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars: is excision necessary?

Authors:  Jennifer N Cawson; Frank Malara; Anne Kavanagh; Prue Hill; Gnani Balasubramanium; Michael Henderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Reduction of the surgical excision rate in benign breast disease using fine needle aspiration cytology with immediate reporting.

Authors:  J M Dixon; P J Clarke; V Crucioli; T C Dehn; E C Lee; M J Greenall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  37 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas Knogler; Peter Homolka; Mathias Hörnig; Robert Leithner; Georg Langs; Martin Waitzbauer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Sabine Leitner; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; M P Lux; E Wenkel; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Long-term MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy results of 600 single-center procedures.

Authors:  J Lambert; T Steelandt; S H Heywang-Köbrunner; K Gieraerts; I Van Den Berghe; Ch Van Ongeval; J W Casselman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with a handheld biopsy system: clinical experience and results in postinterventional MR mammography after 24 h.

Authors:  E A Hauth; H J Jaeger; J Lubnau; S Maderwald; F Otterbach; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Non-operative diagnosis--effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme.

Authors:  M G Wallis; S Cheung; O Kearins; G M Lawrence
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Uwe Fischer; Lorenz Biggemann; Joachim Lotz; Susanne Wienbeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Evaluation of Newly Adapted Clip Marker System in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Suspicion of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.