Literature DB >> 25677978

Mutation profile and clinical outcome of mixed endometrioid-serous endometrial carcinomas are different from that of pure endometrioid or serous carcinomas.

L Coenegrachts1, D A Garcia-Dios, J Depreeuw, M Santacana, S Gatius, M Zikan, P Moerman, L Verbist, D Lambrechts, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Frédéric Amant.   

Abstract

Clinical outcome of 23 patients with mixed endometrioid and serous endometrial carcinomas (mixed EEC-SC) was compared to that of pure endometrioid (EEC) and pure serous (SC) carcinomas. Hotspot mutation frequencies in KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, and TP53 and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were determined in mixed EEC-SC, as well as in their EEC and SC microdissected components separately, and alterations were compared to frequencies in pure EEC and SC. Relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) differed significantly between mixed EEC-SC and pure EEC and SC, revealing that outcome of mixed EEC-SCs was intermediate to that of pure EEC and pure SC. PTEN mutations were absent in pure SC, but occurred in 20 % of pure EEC, and 13 % of mixed EEC-SC. In contrast, TP53 mutations were more frequent in pure SC (17 %) and mixed EEC-SC (22 %) than in pure EEC (2 %). Mutations in mixed EEC-SC were shared by the two microdissected components in 30 %, whereas in 35 %, some mutations were component-specific. Mutation analysis confirms similarities between the EEC and SC components of mixed EEC-SC with pure EEC and pure SC, respectively. However, PTEN and KRAS mutations were more frequent in the SC component of mixed EEC-SC than in pure SC, while TP53 mutations were more frequent in the EEC component of mixed EEC-SC than in pure EEC. Presence of different clonal mutation pattern between EEC and SC components of mixed EEC-SC raises the possibility of divergent tumor heterogeneity or biclonal origin in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25677978     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-015-1728-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  13 in total

1.  The frequency of p53, K-ras mutations, and microsatellite instability differs in uterine endometrioid and serous carcinoma: evidence of distinct molecular genetic pathways.

Authors:  S F Lax; B Kendall; H Tashiro; R J Slebos; L Hedrick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  IMP2 expression distinguishes endometrioid from serous endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Yuxin Liu; Suyang Hao; Bruce A Woda; Di Lu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Frederic Amant; Philippe Moerman; Patrick Neven; Dirk Timmerman; Erik Van Limbergen; Ignace Vergote
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 6-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Endometrial carcinoma: molecular alterations involved in tumor development and progression.

Authors:  A Yeramian; G Moreno-Bueno; X Dolcet; L Catasus; M Abal; E Colas; J Reventos; J Palacios; J Prat; X Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Minor serous and clear cell components adversely affect prognosis in ''mixed-type'' endometrial carcinomas: a clinicopathologic study of 36 stage-I cases.

Authors:  M Ruhul Quddus; C James Sung; Cunxian Zhang; W Dwayne Lawrence
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Pure compared with mixed serous endometrial carcinoma: two different entities?

Authors:  Thijs Roelofsen; Maaike A P C van Ham; Johanna M Wiersma van Tilburg; Saskia F Zomer; Mijke Bol; Leon F A G Massuger; Johan Bulten
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa K McConechy; Jiarui Ding; Maggie Cu Cheang; Kimberly Wiegand; Janine Senz; Alicia Tone; Winnie Yang; Leah Prentice; Kane Tse; Thomas Zeng; Helen McDonald; Amy P Schmidt; David G Mutch; Jessica N McAlpine; Martin Hirst; Sohrab P Shah; Cheng-Han Lee; Paul J Goodfellow; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  High-throughput interrogation of PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, FBXW7 and TP53 mutations in primary endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Diego A Garcia-Dios; Diether Lambrechts; Lieve Coenegrachts; Ingrid Vandenput; An Capoen; Penelope M Webb; Kaltin Ferguson; Lars A Akslen; Bart Claes; Ignace Vergote; Philippe Moerman; Johan Van Robays; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Helga B Salvesen; Amanda B Spurdle; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  New strategies in endometrial cancer: targeting the PI3K/mTOR pathway--the devil is in the details.

Authors:  Andrea P Myers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Simon A Forbes; Nidhi Bindal; Sally Bamford; Charlotte Cole; Chai Yin Kok; David Beare; Mingming Jia; Rebecca Shepherd; Kenric Leung; Andrew Menzies; Jon W Teague; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Exploration of DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jianchao Ying; Teng Xu; Qian Wang; Jun Ye; Jianxin Lyu
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 4.  New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care.

Authors:  A Talhouk; J N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-13

5.  Limited impact of intratumour heterogeneity on molecular risk assignment in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Manouk van Esterik; Inge C Van Gool; Cor D de Kroon; Remi A Nout; Carien L Creutzberg; Vincent T H B M Smit; Tjalling Bosse; Ellen Stelloo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

6.  Prognostic Value of Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Early- and Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ke Ye; Qinqiao Fan; Mingming Yuan; Dong Wang; Liang Xiao; Guo Long; Rongrong Chen; Tongdi Fang; Zengbo Li; Ledu Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Integrating clinical, molecular, proteomic and histopathological data within the tissue context: tissunomics.

Authors:  Santiago Ramón Y Cajal; Stefan Hümmer; Vicente Peg; Xavier M Guiu; Inés De Torres; Josep Castellvi; Elena Martinez-Saez; Javier Hernandez-Losa
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.087

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.