Literature DB >> 23219661

High-throughput interrogation of PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, FBXW7 and TP53 mutations in primary endometrial carcinoma.

Diego A Garcia-Dios1, Diether Lambrechts, Lieve Coenegrachts, Ingrid Vandenput, An Capoen, Penelope M Webb, Kaltin Ferguson, Lars A Akslen, Bart Claes, Ignace Vergote, Philippe Moerman, Johan Van Robays, Janusz Marcickiewicz, Helga B Salvesen, Amanda B Spurdle, Frédéric Amant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer patients may benefit from systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted therapies. Prognostic and predictive markers are needed, however, to identify patients amenable for these therapies.
METHODS: Primary endometrial tumors were genotyped for >100 hot spot mutations in genes potentially acting as prognostic or predictive markers. Mutations were correlated with tumor characteristics in a discovery cohort, replicated in independent cohorts and finally, confirmed in the overall population (n=1063).
RESULTS: PIK3CA, PTEN and KRAS mutations were most frequently detected, respectively in 172 (16.2%), 164 (15.4%) and 161 (15.1%) tumors. Binary logistic regression revealed that PIK3CA mutations were more common in high-grade tumors (OR=2.03; P=0.001 for grade 2 and OR=1.89; P=0.012 for grade 3 compared to grade 1), whereas a positive TP53 status correlated with type II tumors (OR=11.92; P<0.001) and PTEN mutations with type I tumors (OR=19.58; P=0.003). Conversely, FBXW7 mutations correlated with positive lymph nodes (OR=3.38; P=0.045). When assessing the effects of individual hot spot mutations, the H1047R mutation in PIK3CA correlated with high tumor grade and reduced relapse-free survival (HR=2.18; P=0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in PIK3CA, TP53, PTEN and FBXW7 correlate with high tumor grade, endometrial cancer type and lymph node status, whereas PIK3CA H1047R mutations serve as prognostic markers for relapse-free survival in endometrial cancer patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219661     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  32 in total

Review 1.  Dysregulation of ubiquitin ligases in cancer.

Authors:  Jianfei Qi; Ze'ev A Ronai
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 18.500

Review 2.  Targeting the protein-protein interaction between IRS1 and mutant p110α for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Yujun Hao; Shuliang Zhao; Zhenghe Wang
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  PTEN loss is a context-dependent outcome determinant in obese and non-obese endometrioid endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Shannon N Westin; Zhenlin Ju; Russell R Broaddus; Camilla Krakstad; Jane Li; Navdeep Pal; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman; Bryan T Hennessy; Samuel J Klempner; Henrica M J Werner; Helga B Salvesen; Lewis C Cantley; Gordon B Mills; Andrea P Myers
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Poor survival with wild-type TP53 ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Kwong-Kwok Wong; Daisy I Izaguirre; Suet-Yan Kwan; Erin R King; Michael T Deavers; Anil K Sood; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Mutation distributions and clinical correlations of PIK3CA gene mutations in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ebubekir Dirican; Mustafa Akkiprik; Ayşe Özer
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 6.  Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Matias-Guiu; Ben Davidson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Use of comprehensive genomic profiling to direct point-of-care management of patients with gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Kim M Hirshfield; Veronica Rojas; Robert S DiPaola; Darlene Gibbon; Mira Hellmann; Sara Isani; Aliza Leiser; Gregory M Riedlinger; Allison Wagreich; Siraj M Ali; Julia A Elvin; Vincent A Miller; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Endometrial tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation as predictors of germline mismatch repair gene mutation status: a literature review.

Authors:  Alexander M Metcalf; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Discordant Mutations in Paired Primary and Metastatic Endometrial Adenocarcinomas Identified by Semiconductor-Based Sequencing for Rapid Cancer Genotyping.

Authors:  Colin P Bergstrom; Koen De Geest; Rebecca O'Gara; Christopher L Corless; Terry K Morgan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  Prognostic Significance of POLE Exonuclease Domain Mutations in High-Grade Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer on Survival and Recurrence: A Subanalysis.

Authors:  Caroline C Billingsley; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Erinn M Hade; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.