Literature DB >> 21566514

IMP2 expression distinguishes endometrioid from serous endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Liping Zhang1, Yuxin Liu, Suyang Hao, Bruce A Woda, Di Lu.   

Abstract

Among various endometrial adenocarcinomas, endometrioid carcinoma can be very difficult to separate from serous carcinomas. Various biomarkers have been studied with proven value, including p53, Ki-67, and p16. In this study, we present data on another biomarker, IMP2, which we believe is sensitive and specific. Using 320 endometrial biopsy cases, we demonstrate that IMP2 is normally expressed in all proliferative and inactive endometrial glandular cells. The pattern of such expression is unchanged in serous carcinomas. IMP2 expression is, however, lost in all cases of endometrioid carcinomas by at least 25% to >95% of tumor cell populations. Therefore, loss of IMP2 expression can differentiate endometrioid from serous carcinomas. Such finding of IMP2 expression remained the same in mixed endometrioid and serous carcinomas; IMP2 expression is lost in all endometrioid components by at least 25% of tumor cell population, whereas it remained diffuse and strong in all serous components of carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21566514     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318219c6f9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  12 in total

1.  Significance of p53 expression in background endometrium in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuy Thi Nguyen; Toru Hachisuga; Rie Urabe; Tomoko Kurita; Seiji Kagami; Toshinori Kawagoe; Shohei Shimajiri; Kazuki Nabeshima
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Practical issues in the diagnosis of serous carcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  Sonia Gatius; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Mutation profile and clinical outcome of mixed endometrioid-serous endometrial carcinomas are different from that of pure endometrioid or serous carcinomas.

Authors:  L Coenegrachts; D A Garcia-Dios; J Depreeuw; M Santacana; S Gatius; M Zikan; P Moerman; L Verbist; D Lambrechts; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Fenying Lu; Weichang Chen; Tingwang Jiang; Cuie Cheng; Bin Wang; Zhiping Lu; Guojin Huang; Jiaming Qiu; Wei Wei; Ming Yang; Xia Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Oncogenic NRAS, required for pathogenesis of embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma, relies upon the HMGA2-IGF2BP2 pathway.

Authors:  Zhizhong Li; Yunyu Zhang; Krishnan Ramanujan; Yan Ma; David G Kirsch; David J Glass
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  The Roles of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 mRNA-Binding Protein 2 in Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Junguo Cao; Qingchun Mu; Haiyan Huang
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 7.  Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression?

Authors:  Jessica L Bell; Kristin Wächter; Britta Mühleck; Nikolaos Pazaitis; Marcel Köhn; Marcell Lederer; Stefan Hüttelmaier
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  p62/IMP2 stimulates cell migration and reduces cell adhesion in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yang Li; Giulio Francia; Jian-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-20

9.  Similar protein expression profiles of ovarian and endometrial high-grade serous carcinomas.

Authors:  Kosuke Hiramatsu; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Satoshi Serada; Kosuke Yoshihara; Yumiko Hori; Minoru Fujimoto; Shinya Matsuzaki; Tomomi Egawa-Takata; Eiji Kobayashi; Yutaka Ueda; Eiichi Morii; Takayuki Enomoto; Tetsuji Naka; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Peptide-MHC Class I Tetramers Can Fail To Detect Relevant Functional T Cell Clonotypes and Underestimate Antigen-Reactive T Cell Populations.

Authors:  Cristina Rius; Meriem Attaf; Katie Tungatt; Valentina Bianchi; Mateusz Legut; Amandine Bovay; Marco Donia; Per Thor Straten; Mark Peakman; Inge Marie Svane; Sascha Ott; Tom Connor; Barbara Szomolay; Garry Dolton; Andrew K Sewell
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.