Literature DB >> 22653804

Use of mutation profiles to refine the classification of endometrial carcinomas.

Melissa K McConechy1, Jiarui Ding2,3, Maggie Cu Cheang4, Kimberly Wiegand1, Janine Senz1, Alicia Tone1, Winnie Yang1, Leah Prentice1, Kane Tse5, Thomas Zeng5, Helen McDonald5, Amy P Schmidt6, David G Mutch7, Jessica N McAlpine8, Martin Hirst5,9, Sohrab P Shah2,3, Cheng-Han Lee10, Paul J Goodfellow6, C Blake Gilks1,10, David G Huntsman1,2.   

Abstract

The classification of endometrial carcinomas is based on pathological assessment of tumour cell type; the different cell types (endometrioid, serous, carcinosarcoma, mixed, undifferentiated, and clear cell) are associated with distinct molecular alterations. This current classification system for high-grade subtypes, in particular the distinction between high-grade endometrioid (EEC-3) and serous carcinomas (ESC), is limited in its reproducibility and prognostic abilities. Therefore, a search for specific molecular classifiers to improve endometrial carcinoma subclassification is warranted. We performed target enrichment sequencing on 393 endometrial carcinomas from two large cohorts, sequencing exons from the following nine genes: ARID1A, PPP2R1A, PTEN, PIK3CA, KRAS, CTNNB1, TP53, BRAF, and PPP2R5C. Based on this gene panel, each endometrial carcinoma subtype shows a distinct mutation profile. EEC-3s have significantly different frequencies of PTEN and TP53 mutations when compared to low-grade endometrioid carcinomas. ESCs and EEC-3s are distinct subtypes with significantly different frequencies of mutations in PTEN, ARID1A, PPP2R1A, TP53, and CTNNB1. From the mutation profiles, we were able to identify subtype outliers, ie cases diagnosed morphologically as one subtype but with a mutation profile suggestive of a different subtype. Careful review of these diagnostically challenging cases suggested that the original morphological classification was incorrect in most instances. The molecular profile of carcinosarcomas suggests two distinct mutation profiles for these tumours: endometrioid-type (PTEN, PIK3CA, ARID1A, KRAS mutations) and serous-type (TP53 and PPP2R1A mutations). While this nine-gene panel does not allow for a purely molecularly based classification of endometrial carcinoma, it may prove useful as an adjunct to morphological classification and serve as an aid in the classification of problematic cases. If used in practice, it may lead to improved diagnostic reproducibility and may also serve to stratify patients for targeted therapeutics.
Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22653804      PMCID: PMC3939694          DOI: 10.1002/path.4056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  48 in total

1.  EGFR-mediated re-activation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib.

Authors:  Ryan B Corcoran; Hiromichi Ebi; Alexa B Turke; Erin M Coffee; Michiya Nishino; Alexandria P Cogdill; Ronald D Brown; Patricia Della Pelle; Dora Dias-Santagata; Kenneth E Hung; Keith T Flaherty; Adriano Piris; Jennifer A Wargo; Jeffrey Settleman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Mutational analysis of the PTEN gene in endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia.

Authors:  H Sun; T Enomoto; M Fujita; H Wada; K Yoshino; K Ozaki; T Nakamura; Y Murata
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Mutational analysis of the CTNNB1 and APC genes in uterine endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  P W Schlosshauer; E C Pirog; R L Levine; L H Ellenson
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Subtype-specific mutation of PPP2R1A in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa K McConechy; Michael S Anglesio; Steve E Kalloger; Winnie Yang; Janine Senz; Christine Chow; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Gregg B Morin; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Mark S Carey; Jessica N McAlpine; Janice S Kwon; Leah M Prentice; Niki Boyd; Sohrab P Shah; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Somatic mutations of PPP2R1A in ovarian and uterine carcinomas.

Authors:  Ie-Ming Shih; Pradeep K Panuganti; Kuan-Tin Kuo; Tsui-Lien Mao; Elisabetta Kuhn; Sian Jones; Victor E Velculescu; Robert J Kurman; Tian-Li Wang
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Low frequency of somatic mutations in uterine sarcomas: a molecular analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  S Murray; H Linardou; G Mountzios; M Manoloukos; S Markaki; E Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou; M A Dimopoulos; C A Papadimitriou
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Molecular profiling of endometrial malignancies.

Authors:  Norasate Samarnthai; Kevin Hall; I-Tien Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-03-28

Review 8.  Prognostic parameters of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes.

Authors:  P M Pollock; M G Gartside; L C Dejeza; M A Powell; M A Mallon; H Davies; M Mohammadi; P A Futreal; M R Stratton; J M Trent; P J Goodfellow
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour-normal paired sequencing data.

Authors:  Jiarui Ding; Ali Bashashati; Andrew Roth; Arusha Oloumi; Kane Tse; Thomas Zeng; Gholamreza Haffari; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Anne Condon; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  104 in total

1.  Molecular-based classification algorithm for endometrial carcinoma categorizes ovarian endometrioid carcinoma into prognostically significant groups.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Bin Xu; Sam Khalouei; Dina Bassiouny; Matthew Cesari; Nadia Ismiil; Sharon Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Clinicopathological analysis of endometrial carcinomas harboring somatic POLE exonuclease domain mutations.

Authors:  Yaser R Hussein; Britta Weigelt; Douglas A Levine; J Kenneth Schoolmeester; Linda N Dao; Bonnie L Balzer; Georgia Liles; Beth Karlan; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  PTEN Expression as a Predictor of Response to Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Duangmani Thanapprapasr; Rebecca A Previs; Wei Hu; Cristina Ivan; Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena; Piotr L Dorniak; Jean M Hansen; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Jie Huang; Heather J Dalton; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Robert L Coleman; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 4.  Molecular staging of gynecological cancer: What is the future?

Authors:  Pratibha S Binder; Jaime Prat; David G Mutch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 5.  The emerging genomic landscape of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Matthieu Le Gallo; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  A phase II study of frontline paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab, paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus, or ixabepilone/carboplatin/bevacizumab in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Carol Aghajanian; Virginia Filiaci; Don S Dizon; Jay W Carlson; Matthew A Powell; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Krishnansu S Tewari; David P Bender; David M O'Malley; Ashley Stuckey; JianJiong Gao; Fanny Dao; Robert A Soslow; Heather A Lankes; Kathleen Moore; Douglas A Levine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  An NRG Oncology/GOG study of molecular classification for risk prediction in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Craig M Rush; Heather A Lankes; William T Creasman; David S Miller; Nilsa C Ramirez; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Cynthia Timmers; Adrian A Suarez; Richard J Zaino; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Prognostic biomarkers in endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Xavier Matias-Guiu; Ben Davidson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Targeted therapy in uterine serous carcinoma: an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan D Black; Diana P English; Dana M Roque; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2014-01

10.  Molecular Analysis of Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas Shows Clonality in Most Cases.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Bo Meng; Lien N Hoang; Noorah Almadani; Xiaodong Li; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks; Cheng-Han Lee
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.