Literature DB >> 25673290

The quality movement or making radiology fun again.

C Craig Blackmore1.   

Abstract

Quality can be seen as the link between what we do as radiologists and patient health. The radiology quality movement represents an opportunity for radiologists to have more direct influence on patient health, including the quality domains of safety, effectiveness, patient centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equitability. Focusing on quality allows emergency radiologists to extend outside of the confines of the reading room, thereby enhancing a rewarding and clinically relevant practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673290     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015-1298-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  16 in total

1.  Systematic survey of discrepancy rates in an international teleradiology service.

Authors:  Anjali Agrawal; Anurag Agrawal; Meenakshi Pandit; Arjun Kalyanpur
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-08-25

2.  Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging.

Authors:  C Craig Blackmore; Robert S Mecklenburg; Gary S Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations.

Authors:  Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.

Authors:  Hani Abujudeh; Robert S Pyatt; Michael A Bruno; Alison L Chetlen; David Buck; Susan K Hobbs; Christopher Roth; Charles Truwit; Rajan Agarwal; Scott T O Kennedy; Lucille Glenn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry.

Authors:  Adam Lukasiewicz; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield; Laura Coombs; Monica Ghita; Jeffrey Weinreb; Gowthaman Gunabushanam; Christopher L Moore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; M Reardon; J P Stewart; J Maloney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis.

Authors:  Christopher L Sistrom; Pragya A Dang; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Keith J Dreyer; Daniel I Rosenthal; James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A quality improvement initiative to reduce unnecessary follow-up imaging for adnexal lesions.

Authors:  Jamie S Hui; Dawna J Kramer; C Craig Blackmore; Beverly E Hashimoto; David L Coy
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Jeremy Grimshaw; Robert J Brison; Brian H Rowe; Michael J Schull; Jacques S Lee; Jamie Brehaut; R Douglas McKnight; Mary A Eisenhauer; Jonathan Dreyer; Eric Letovsky; Tim Rutledge; Iain MacPhail; Scott Ross; Amit Shah; Jeffrey J Perry; Brian R Holroyd; Urbain Ip; Howard Lesiuk; George A Wells
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.