Literature DB >> 15681686

Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations.

Mythreyi Bhargavan1, Jonathan H Sunshine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the most recent available data for levels and trends in utilization of radiology procedures across populations, modalities, and geographic areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aggregated claims data from Medicare enrollees for all radiology procedures and from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey of almost 25 000 Americans, for some radiology procedures, were used to calculate population-based utilization for the relevant age groups. Limited private insurer data also were obtained. All radiology utilization was measured and reported, irrespective of provider specialty. Average levels and percentiles of utilization were measured according to modality, and average annual rates of increase in utilization were compared across modalities, data sources, and regions. Rates of increase in utilization according to modality and state were compared for correlation with state characteristics and initial utilization levels.
RESULTS: In 2001, 4176 diagnostic and 274 therapeutic radiology procedures were performed per 1000 Medicare non-managed care enrollees. Nearly one-half of diagnostic procedures (n=2057) involved radiography. The other half involved computed tomography (CT) (n=391), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n=114), ultrasonography (US) (n=921), interventional radiology (n=215), mammography (n=221), and nuclear medicine (n=249). On average, between 1998 and 2001, utilization per Medicare enrollee increased 16% per year for MR imaging and 7%-15% per year for CT, US, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine, while that for radiography increased 1% per year. The proportion of diagnostic radiology procedures performed in ambulatory settings increased from 62% in 1992 to 68% in 2001. There was wide variation across states in utilization by Medicare enrollees. State totals for diagnostic radiology were 3038 in the 10th percentile and 4573 in the 90th percentile. In 1999, MEPS reported average utilization in ambulatory settings as follows: 64 MR imaging, 102 US, 73 mammographic, 326 radiographic, and 43 radiation therapy procedures per 1000 persons (all ages) in the U.S. population.
CONCLUSION: Utilization of high-technology modalities increased rapidly, while that of radiography was relatively stagnant. Variation in utilization among states and census regions was substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15681686     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2343031536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  62 in total

1.  Use of abdominopelvic computed tomography in emergency departments and rates of urgent diagnoses in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Caroline Kerner; Kathleen Carey; Angela M Mills; Wei Yang; Marie B Synnestvedt; Susan Hilton; Mark G Weiner; James D Lewis
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Authors:  Sharon W Kwan; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Robert K Kerlan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Toward evidence-based decisions in diagnostic radiology: a research and rating process for multiple decision-makers.

Authors:  Daniel A Ollendorf; C Craig Blackmore; Janie M Lee
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  Quo vadis? Trends in demographics and pediatric care and their impact on the specialty of pediatric radiology.

Authors:  George A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-06-30

5.  Use of Radcube for extraction of finding trends in a large radiology practice.

Authors:  Pragya A Dang; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael A Blake; Thomas J Schultz; Markus Stout; Elkan F Halpern; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Grace C Hillyer; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Imaging utilization commentary: a radiology perspective.

Authors:  Martin H Reed
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

8.  A Web Application for Adrenal Incidentaloma Identification, Tracking, and Management Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Wasif Bala; Jackson Steinkamp; Timothy Feeney; Avneesh Gupta; Abhinav Sharma; Jake Kantrowitz; Nicholas Cordella; James Moses; Frederick Thurston Drake
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Association of radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction with lung cancer.

Authors:  David O Wilson; Joel L Weissfeld; Arzu Balkan; Jeffrey G Schragin; Carl R Fuhrman; Stephen N Fisher; Jonathan Wilson; Joseph K Leader; Jill M Siegfried; Steven D Shapiro; Frank C Sciurba
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.