Literature DB >> 25672978

Exploring the biomechanical properties of brain malignancies and their pathologic determinants in vivo with magnetic resonance elastography.

Yann Jamin1, Jessica K R Boult1, Jin Li1, Sergey Popov2,3, Philippe Garteiser4, Jose L Ulloa5, Craig Cummings1, Gary Box3, Suzanne A Eccles3, Chris Jones2,3, John C Waterton6, Jeffrey C Bamber1, Ralph Sinkus7, Simon P Robinson1.   

Abstract

Malignant tumors are typically associated with altered rigidity relative to normal host tissue. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) enables the noninvasive quantitation of the mechanical properties of deep-seated tissue following application of an external vibrational mechanical stress to that tissue. In this preclinical study, we used MRE to quantify (kPa) the elasticity modulus Gd and viscosity modulus Gl of three intracranially implanted glioma and breast metastatic tumor models. In all these brain tumors, we found a notable softness characterized by lower elasticity and viscosity than normal brain parenchyma, enabling their detection on Gd and Gl parametric maps. The most circumscribed tumor (U-87 MG glioma) was the stiffest, whereas the most infiltrative tumor (MDA-MB-231 metastatic breast carcinoma) was the softest. Tumor cell density and microvessel density correlated significantly and positively with elasticity and viscosity, whereas there was no association with the extent of collagen deposition or myelin fiber entrapment. In conclusion, although malignant tumors tend to exhibit increased rigidity, intracranial tumors presented as remarkably softer than normal brain parenchyma. Our findings reinforce the case for MRE use in diagnosing and staging brain malignancies, based on the association of different tumor phenotypes with different mechanical properties. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672978      PMCID: PMC4384983          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  43 in total

1.  Fractal network dimension and viscoelastic powerlaw behavior: II. An experimental study of structure-mimicking phantoms by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Oleg Posnansky; Sebastian Hirsch; Michael Scheel; Matthias Taupitz; Juergen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  MR elastography derived shear stiffness--a new imaging biomarker for the assessment of early tumor response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Jun Chen; Kevin J Glaser; Yogesh K Mariappan; Brian Reuland; Steven Ziesmer; Rickey Carter; Stephen M Ansell; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Rapid, label-free detection of brain tumors with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.

Authors:  Minbiao Ji; Daniel A Orringer; Christian W Freudiger; Shakti Ramkissoon; Xiaohui Liu; Darryl Lau; Alexandra J Golby; Isaiah Norton; Marika Hayashi; Nathalie Y R Agar; Geoffrey S Young; Cathie Spino; Sandro Santagata; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Keith L Ligon; Oren Sagher; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Lysyl oxidase enzymatic function increases stiffness to drive colorectal cancer progression through FAK.

Authors:  A-M Baker; D Bird; G Lang; T R Cox; J T Erler
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling.

Authors:  Kandice R Levental; Hongmei Yu; Laura Kass; Johnathon N Lakins; Mikala Egeblad; Janine T Erler; Sheri F T Fong; Katalin Csiszar; Amato Giaccia; Wolfgang Weninger; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David L Gasser; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  LOX-mediated collagen crosslinking is responsible for fibrosis-enhanced metastasis.

Authors:  Thomas R Cox; Demelza Bird; Ann-Marie Baker; Holly E Barker; Melisa W-Y Ho; Georgina Lang; Janine T Erler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Fredric B Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Jonathan M Morris; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  J Li; Y Jamin; J K R Boult; C Cummings; J C Waterton; J Ulloa; R Sinkus; J C Bamber; S P Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Tissue mechanics modulate microRNA-dependent PTEN expression to regulate malignant progression.

Authors:  Janna K Mouw; Yoshihiro Yui; Laura Damiano; Russell O Bainer; Johnathon N Lakins; Irene Acerbi; Guanqing Ou; Amanda C Wijekoon; Kandice R Levental; Penney M Gilbert; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Towards an elastographic atlas of brain anatomy.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Sebastian Hirsch; Andreas Fehlner; Sebastian Papazoglou; Michael Scheel; Juergen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; John Virostko; Richard G Abramson; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Pedro Enriquez-Navas; Robert Gillies; John D Hazle; Ralph P Mason; C Chad Quarles; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Junzhong Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression.

Authors:  Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Ledia Lilaj; Felix Schrank; Jürgen Braun; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Martin Reiss-Zimmermann; Josef A Käs; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phantom evaluations of nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Ligin M Solamen; Matthew D McGarry; Likun Tan; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Nanomechanics and Histopathology as Diagnostic Tools to Characterize Freshly Removed Human Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Mateusz Cieśluk; Katarzyna Pogoda; Piotr Deptuła; Paulina Werel; Alina Kułakowska; Jan Kochanowicz; Zenon Mariak; Tomasz Łysoń; Joanna Reszeć; Robert Bucki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-06

5.  Correlation of biomechanics and cancer cell phenotype by combined Brillouin and Raman spectroscopy of U87-MG glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Jan Rix; Ortrud Uckermann; Katrin Kirsche; Gabriele Schackert; Edmund Koch; Matthias Kirsch; Roberta Galli
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 6.  Virtual Biopsy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma. How Close Are We?

Authors:  Amani Arthur; Edward W Johnston; Jessica M Winfield; Matthew D Blackledge; Robin L Jones; Paul H Huang; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Characterization of glioblastoma in an orthotopic mouse model with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Navid Nazari; Michal O Nowicki; Miklos Palotai; Sean E Lawler; Ralph Sinkus; Paul E Barbone; Samuel Patz
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Imaging acute effects of bevacizumab on tumor vascular kinetics in a preclinical orthotopic model of U251 glioma.

Authors:  Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Rasha Elmghirbi; Stephen L Brown; Julian A Rey; Lonni Schultz; Abir Mukherjee; Glauber Cabral; Swayamprava Panda; Ian Y Lee; Malisa Sarntinoranont; Kelly A Keenan; Robert A Knight; James R Ewing
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Relationship between Shear Stiffness Measured by MR Elastography and Perfusion Metrics Measured by Perfusion CT of Meningiomas.

Authors:  T Takamura; U Motosugi; M Ogiwara; Y Sasaki; K J Glaser; R L Ehman; H Kinouchi; H Onishi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  A computational model of glioma reveals opposing, stiffness-sensitive effects of leaky vasculature and tumor growth on tissue mechanical stress and porosity.

Authors:  Julian A Rey; James R Ewing; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.