Literature DB >> 31843897

How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression.

Kaspar-Josche Streitberger1, Ledia Lilaj2, Felix Schrank2, Jürgen Braun3, Karl-Titus Hoffmann4, Martin Reiss-Zimmermann4,5, Josef A Käs6, Ingolf Sack7.   

Abstract

Mechanical properties of biological tissues and, above all, their solid or fluid behavior influence the spread of malignant tumors. While it is known that solid tumors tend to have higher mechanical rigidity, allowing them to aggressively invade and spread in solid surrounding healthy tissue, it is unknown how softer tumors can grow within a more rigid environment such as the brain. Here, we use in vivo magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to elucidate the role of anomalous fluidity for the invasive growth of soft brain tumors, showing that aggressive glioblastomas (GBMs) have higher water content while behaving like solids. Conversely, our data show that benign meningiomas (MENs), which contain less water than brain tissue, are characterized by fluid-like behavior. The fact that the 2 tumor entities do not differ in their soft properties suggests that fluidity plays an important role for a tumor's aggressiveness and infiltrative potential. Using tissue-mimicking phantoms, we show that the anomalous fluidity of neurotumors physically enables GBMs to penetrate surrounding tissue, a phenomenon similar to Saffman-Taylor viscous-fingering instabilities, which occur at moving interfaces between fluids of different viscosity. Thus, targeting tissue fluidity of malignant tumors might open horizons for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glioblastoma; in vivo magnetic resonance elastography; invasive growth; neurotumors; viscous fingering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843897      PMCID: PMC6955323          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913511116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumors.

Authors:  L M DeAngelis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids.

Authors:  G Helmlinger; P A Netti; H C Lichtenbeld; R J Melder; R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence.

Authors:  Jochen Guck; Stefan Schinkinger; Bryan Lincoln; Falk Wottawah; Susanne Ebert; Maren Romeyke; Dominik Lenz; Harold M Erickson; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Daniel Mitchell; Josef Käs; Sydney Ulvick; Curt Bilby
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling.

Authors:  Kandice R Levental; Hongmei Yu; Laura Kass; Johnathon N Lakins; Mikala Egeblad; Janine T Erler; Sheri F T Fong; Katalin Csiszar; Amato Giaccia; Wolfgang Weninger; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David L Gasser; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography of brain tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  L Xu; Y Lin; J C Han; Z N Xi; H Shen; P Y Gao
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 6.  Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michael Lim; Yuanxuan Xia; Chetan Bettegowda; Michael Weller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression.

Authors:  Darci T Butcher; Tamara Alliston; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  High-resolution mechanical imaging of glioblastoma by multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Martin Reiss-Zimmermann; Florian Baptist Freimann; Simon Bayerl; Jing Guo; Felix Arlt; Jens Wuerfel; Jürgen Braun; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MYCN-dependent expression of sulfatase-2 regulates neuroblastoma cell survival.

Authors:  Valeria Solari; Lucia Borriello; Gianluca Turcatel; Hiroyuki Shimada; Richard Sposto; G Esteban Fernandez; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Edwin A Yates; Jeremy E Turnbull; Yves A DeClerck
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Fingering instabilities in tissue invasion: an active fluid model.

Authors:  Michał J Bogdan; Thierry Savin
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  25 in total

1.  Altered Glycan Expression on Breast Cancer Cells Facilitates Infection by T3 Seroptype Oncolytic Reovirus.

Authors:  Danahe Mohammed; Melanie Koehler; Andra C Dumitru; Pavithra Aravamudhan; Danica M Sutherland; Terence S Dermody; David Alsteens
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 11.189

2.  Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography-based tomoelastography of the parotid glands-feasibility and reference values.

Authors:  Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Rolf Reiter; Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Bernd Hamm; Lars-Arne Schaafs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The Cell as Matter: Connecting Molecular Biology to Cellular Functions.

Authors:  Yiwei Li; Wenhui Tang; Ming Guo
Journal:  Matter       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 4.  Collective Cell Migration on Collagen-I Networks: The Impact of Matrix Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Ivana Pajic-Lijakovic; Milan Milivojevic; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Prostate Apoptosis Response-4 (Par-4): A Novel Target in Pyronaridine-Induced Apoptosis in Glioblastoma (GBM) Cells.

Authors:  Jeevan Ghosalkar; Vinay Sonawane; Tejal Pisal; Swati Achrekar; Radha Pujari; Ashish Chugh; Padma Shastry; Kalpana Joshi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Quantifying stability of parameter estimates forin vivonearly incompressible transversely-isotropic brain MR elastography.

Authors:  Dhrubo Jyoti; Matthew McGarry; Elijah Van Houten; Damian Sowinski; Philip V Bayly; Curtis L Johnson; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  Impact of material homogeneity assumption on cortical stiffness estimates by MR elastography.

Authors:  Jonathan M Scott; KowsalyaDevi Pavuluri; Joshua D Trzasko; Armando Manduca; Matthew L Senjem; John Huston; Richard L Ehman; Matthew C Murphy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.737

8.  Tomoelastography for non-invasive detection of ameloblastoma and metastatic neck lymph nodes.

Authors:  Marie Beier; Ingolf Sack; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Bernd Hamm; Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-09

9.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Michal O Nowicki; Miklos Palotai; Navid Nazari; Rachel Zane; Ralph Sinkus; Sean E Lawler; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Multi-Omics Analysis in Initiation and Progression of Meningiomas: From Pathogenesis to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jiachen Liu; Congcong Xia; Gaiqing Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.