Literature DB >> 23801372

MR elastography derived shear stiffness--a new imaging biomarker for the assessment of early tumor response to chemotherapy.

Kay M Pepin1, Jun Chen, Kevin J Glaser, Yogesh K Mariappan, Brian Reuland, Steven Ziesmer, Rickey Carter, Stephen M Ansell, Richard L Ehman, Kiaran P McGee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The overall goal is to develop magnetic resonance elastography derived shear stiffness as a biomarker for the early identification of chemotherapy response, allowing dose, agent type and treatment regimen to be tailored on a per patient basis, improving therapeutic outcome and minimizing normal tissue toxicity. The specific purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of this novel biomarker to measure the treatment response in a well-known chemotherapy model.
METHODS: Tumors were grown in the right flank of genetically modified mice by subcutaneous injection of DoHH2 (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) cells. Magnetic resonance elastography was used to quantify tumor stiffness before and after injection of a chemotherapeutic agent or saline. Histological tests were also performed on the tumors.
RESULTS: A significant decrease (P < 0.0001) in magnetic resonance elastography-derived tumor shear stiffness was observed within 4 days of chemotherapy treatment, while no appreciable change was observed in saline-treated tumors. No significant change in volume occurred at this early stage, but there were decreased levels of cellular proliferation in chemotherapy-treated tumors.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that magnetic resonance elastography-derived estimates of shear stiffness reflect an initial response to cytotoxic therapy and suggest that this metric could be an early and sensitive biomarker of tumor response to chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; cancer stiffness; chemotherapy response; individualized medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801372      PMCID: PMC4214143          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  22 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images.

Authors:  A Manduca; D S Lake; S A Kruse; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability.

Authors:  Michael J Rosenbluth; Wilbur A Lam; Daniel A Fletcher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Jonathan Vappou; Elodie Breton; Philippe Choquet; Rémy Willinger; André Constantinesco
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Portal hypertension correlates with splenic stiffness as measured with MR elastography.

Authors:  Geir I Nedredal; Meng Yin; Travis McKenzie; Joseph Lillegard; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Jayant Talwalkar; Richard Ehman; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Philip A Araoz; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Ingolf Sack; Bernd Beierbach; Uwe Hamhaber; Dieter Klatt; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  MR elastography of liver tumours: value of viscoelastic properties for tumour characterisation.

Authors:  Philippe Garteiser; Sabrina Doblas; Jean-Luc Daire; Mathilde Wagner; Helena Leitao; Valérie Vilgrain; Ralph Sinkus; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  23 in total

1.  Value of tumor stiffness measured with MR elastography for assessment of response of hepatocellular carcinoma to locoregional therapy.

Authors:  Sonja Gordic; Jad Bou Ayache; Paul Kennedy; Cecilia Besa; Mathilde Wagner; Octavia Bane; Richard L Ehman; Edward Kim; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-06

2.  Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of modality independent elastography in a murine model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Katelyn M Flint; Violeta Sanchez; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-02

3.  Ultrasound elastography as an imaging biomarker for detection of early tumor response to chemotherapy in a murine breast cancer model: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Wang; Zhi-Xing Guo; Qing-Guang Lin; Wei Zheng; Shu-Lian Zhuang; Shi-Yang Lin; An-Hua Li; Xiao-Qing Pei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 6.  Advances and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Elastography.

Authors:  Huiming Dong; Richard D White; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 7.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  A longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography study of murine brain tumors following radiation therapy.

Authors:  Y Feng; E H Clayton; R J Okamoto; J Engelbach; P V Bayly; J R Garbow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

10.  Soft Tissue Sarcoma Stiffness and Perfusion Evaluation by MRE and DCE-MRI for Radiation Therapy Response Assessment: A Technical Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Kay Pepin; Roger Grimm; Soudabeh Kargar; B Matthew Howe; Karen Fritchie; Matthew Frick; Doris Wenger; Scott Okuno; Richard Ehman; Kiaran McGee; Sarah James; Nadia Laack; Michael Herman; Deanna Pafundi
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.