Literature DB >> 29193449

Characterization of glioblastoma in an orthotopic mouse model with magnetic resonance elastography.

Katharina Schregel1,2,3, Navid Nazari1,4, Michal O Nowicki5, Miklos Palotai1,2, Sean E Lawler2,5, Ralph Sinkus6, Paul E Barbone7, Samuel Patz1,2.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. It is highly malignant and has a correspondingly poor prognosis. Diagnosis and monitoring are mainly accomplished with MRI, but remain challenging in some cases. Therefore, complementary methods for tumor detection and characterization would be beneficial. Using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), we performed a longitudinal study of the biomechanical properties of intracranially implanted GBM in mice and compared the results to histopathology. The biomechanical parameters of viscoelastic modulus, shear wave speed and phase angle were significantly lower in tumors compared with healthy brain tissue and decreased over time with tumor progression. Moreover, some MRE parameters revealed sub-regions at later tumor stages, which were not easily detectable on anatomical MRI images. Comparison with histopathology showed that softer tumor regions contained necrosis and patches of viable tumor cells. In contrast, areas of densely packed tumor cells and blood vessels identified with histology coincided with higher values of viscoelastic modulus and shear wave speed. Interestingly, the phase angle was independent from these anatomical variations. In summary, MRE depicted longitudinal and morphological changes in GBM and may prove valuable for tumor characterization in patients.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tumor; glioblastoma; longitudinal progression; magnetic resonance elastography; stiffness; viscoelastic modulus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29193449      PMCID: PMC6538416          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  23 in total

1.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice.

Authors:  M Essig; N Anzalone; S E Combs; À Dörfler; S-K Lee; P Picozzi; A Rovira; M Weller; M Law
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Michael A Green; Lynne E Bilston; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography.

Authors:  Ralph Sinkus; Mickael Tanter; Tanja Xydeas; Stefan Catheline; Jeremy Bercoff; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance elastography: a review.

Authors:  Yogesh K Mariappan; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Indirubins decrease glioma invasion by blocking migratory phenotypes in both the tumor and stromal endothelial cell compartments.

Authors:  Shanté P Williams; Michal O Nowicki; Fang Liu; Rachael Press; Jakub Godlewski; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Balveen Kaur; Soledad A Fernandez; E Antonio Chiocca; Sean E Lawler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Demyelination reduces brain parenchymal stiffness quantified in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Eva Wuerfel; Philippe Garteiser; Ines Gemeinhardt; Timour Prozorovski; Orhan Aktas; Hartmut Merz; Dirk Petersen; Jens Wuerfel; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography of brain tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  L Xu; Y Lin; J C Han; Z N Xi; H Shen; P Y Gao
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 9.  Glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Alicia Tosoni; Enrico Franceschi; Michele Reni; Gemma Gatta; Charles Vecht
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Fredric B Meyer; Giuseppe Lanzino; Jonathan M Morris; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; John Virostko; Richard G Abramson; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Pedro Enriquez-Navas; Robert Gillies; John D Hazle; Ralph P Mason; C Chad Quarles; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Junzhong Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression.

Authors:  Kaspar-Josche Streitberger; Ledia Lilaj; Felix Schrank; Jürgen Braun; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Martin Reiss-Zimmermann; Josef A Käs; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nanomechanics and Histopathology as Diagnostic Tools to Characterize Freshly Removed Human Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Mateusz Cieśluk; Katarzyna Pogoda; Piotr Deptuła; Paulina Werel; Alina Kułakowska; Jan Kochanowicz; Zenon Mariak; Tomasz Łysoń; Joanna Reszeć; Robert Bucki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-06

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Rodent Brain.

Authors:  Mathilde Bigot; Fabien Chauveau; Olivier Beuf; Simon A Lambert
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Imaging localized neuronal activity at fast time scales through biomechanics.

Authors:  Samuel Patz; Daniel Fovargue; Katharina Schregel; Navid Nazari; Miklos Palotai; Paul E Barbone; Ben Fabry; Alexander Hammers; Sverre Holm; Sebastian Kozerke; David Nordsletten; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius; Katharina Schregel; Ralph Sinkus; Alexandra Golby; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Targeted Blood Brain Barrier Opening With Focused Ultrasound Induces Focal Macrophage/Microglial Activation in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Caroline Baufeld; Miklos Palotai; Roberta Meroni; Paolo Fiorina; Jens Wuerfel; Ralph Sinkus; Yong-Zhi Zhang; Nathan McDannold; P Jason White; Charles R G Guttmann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Inducing Biomechanical Heterogeneity in Brain Tumor Modeling by MR Elastography: Effects on Tumor Growth, Vascular Density and Delivery of Therapeutics.

Authors:  Constantinos Harkos; Siri Fløgstad Svensson; Kyrre E Emblem; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Mechanical Properties in the Glioma Microenvironment: Emerging Insights and Theranostic Opportunities.

Authors:  Adip G Bhargav; Joseph S Domino; Roukoz Chamoun; Sufi M Thomas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model.

Authors:  Katharina Schregel; Michal O Nowicki; Miklos Palotai; Navid Nazari; Rachel Zane; Ralph Sinkus; Sean E Lawler; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.