Peggy S Lai1,2,3, Jing-Qing Hang4, Linda Valeri2, Feng-Ying Zhang4, Bu-Yong Zheng4, Amar J Mehta2, Jing Shi5, Li Su2, Dan Brown6, Ellen A Eisen2,6, David C Christiani1,2,3. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States. 2. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. 4. Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. 5. China Institute of Industrial Relations, Beijing, China. 6. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the trajectory of lung function change after exposure cessation to occupational organic dust exposure, and to identify factors that modify improvement. METHODS: The Shanghai Textile Worker Study is a longitudinal study of 447 cotton workers exposed to endotoxin-containing dust and 472 silk workers exposed to non-endotoxin-containing dust. Spirometry was performed at 5-year intervals. Air sampling was performed to estimate individual cumulative exposures. The effect of work cessation on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was modelled using generalised additive mixed effects models to identify the trajectory of FEV1 recovery. Linear mixed effects models incorporating interaction terms were used to identify modifiers of FEV1 recovery. Loss to follow-up was accounted for with inverse probability of censoring weights. RESULTS: 74.2% of the original cohort still alive participated in 2011. Generalised additive mixed models identified a non-linear improvement in FEV1 for all workers after exposure cessation, with no plateau noted 25 years after retirement. Linear mixed effects models incorporating interaction terms identified prior endotoxin exposure (p=0.01) and male gender (p=0.002) as risk factors for impaired FEV1 improvement after exposure cessation. After adjusting for gender, smoking delayed the onset of FEV1 gain but did not affect the overall magnitude of change. CONCLUSIONS: Lung function improvement after cessation of exposure to organic dust is sustained. Endotoxin exposure and male gender are risk factors for less FEV1 improvement. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine the trajectory of lung function change after exposure cessation to occupational organic dust exposure, and to identify factors that modify improvement. METHODS: The Shanghai Textile Worker Study is a longitudinal study of 447 cotton workers exposed to endotoxin-containing dust and 472 silk workers exposed to non-endotoxin-containing dust. Spirometry was performed at 5-year intervals. Air sampling was performed to estimate individual cumulative exposures. The effect of work cessation on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was modelled using generalised additive mixed effects models to identify the trajectory of FEV1 recovery. Linear mixed effects models incorporating interaction terms were used to identify modifiers of FEV1 recovery. Loss to follow-up was accounted for with inverse probability of censoring weights. RESULTS: 74.2% of the original cohort still alive participated in 2011. Generalised additive mixed models identified a non-linear improvement in FEV1 for all workers after exposure cessation, with no plateau noted 25 years after retirement. Linear mixed effects models incorporating interaction terms identified prior endotoxin exposure (p=0.01) and male gender (p=0.002) as risk factors for impaired FEV1 improvement after exposure cessation. After adjusting for gender, smoking delayed the onset of FEV1 gain but did not affect the overall magnitude of change. CONCLUSIONS: Lung function improvement after cessation of exposure to organic dust is sustained. Endotoxin exposure and male gender are risk factors for less FEV1 improvement. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Marit Skogstad; Liv Ingunn Bjoner Sikkeland; Reidun Øvstebø; Kari Bente Foss Haug; Kari Kulvik Heldal; Øivind Skare; Johny Kongerud; Peter Kierulf; Wijnand Eduard Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: José H Jacobs; Esmeralda J M Krop; Siegfried de Wind; Jack Spithoven; Dick J J Heederik Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Ling Cui; Lisa G Gallagher; Roberta M Ray; Wenjin Li; Daoli Gao; Yingzhe Zhang; Sverre Vedal; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Markus J Ege; Melanie Mayer; Anne-Cécile Normand; Jon Genuneit; William O C M Cookson; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Dick Heederik; Renaud Piarroux; Erika von Mutius Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Susan V Lynch; Robert A Wood; Homer Boushey; Leonard B Bacharier; Gordon R Bloomberg; Meyer Kattan; George T O'Connor; Megan T Sandel; Agustin Calatroni; Elizabeth Matsui; Christine C Johnson; Henry Lynn; Cynthia M Visness; Katy F Jaffee; Peter J Gergen; Diane R Gold; Rosalind J Wright; Kei Fujimura; Marcus Rauch; William W Busse; James E Gern Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Peggy S Lai; Jennifer M Fresco; Miguel A Pinilla; Alvaro A Macias; Ronald D Brown; Joshua A Englert; Oliver Hofmann; James A Lederer; Winston Hide; David C Christiani; Manuela Cernadas; Rebecca M Baron Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Peggy S Lai; Jing-Qing Hang; Feng-Ying Zhang; Xinyi Lin; Bu-Yong Zheng; Hei-Lian Dai; Li Su; Tianxi Cai; David C Christiani Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Sean Semple; Delan Devakumar; Duncan G Fullerton; Peter S Thorne; Nervana Metwali; Anthony Costello; Stephen B Gordon; Dharma S Manandhar; Jon G Ayres Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: E Neil Schachter; Eugenija Zuskin; Erin L Moshier; James Godbold; Jadranka Mustajbegovic; Jasna Pucarin-Cvetkovic; Angelo Chiarelli Journal: Environ Health Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Megan Ulmer Carnes; Jane A Hoppin; Nervana Metwali; Annah B Wyss; John L Hankinson; Elizabeth Long O'Connell; Marie Richards; Stuart Long; Laura E Beane Freeman; Dale P Sandler; Paul K Henneberger; Christie Barker-Cummings; David M Umbach; Peter S Thorne; Stephanie J London Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-03
Authors: Ted R Mikuls; Rohit Gaurav; Geoffrey M Thiele; Bryant R England; Madison G Wolfe; Brianna P Shaw; Kristina L Bailey; Todd A Wyatt; Amy J Nelson; Michael J Duryee; Carlos D Hunter; Dong Wang; Debra J Romberger; Dana P Ascherman; Jill A Poole Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Peggy S Lai; Jing-Qing Hang; Feng-Ying Zhang; J Sun; Bu-Yong Zheng; Li Su; George R Washko; David C Christiani Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Sinjini Sikdar; Annah B Wyss; Mi Kyeong Lee; Thanh T Hoang; Marie Richards; Laura E Beane Freeman; Christine Parks; Peter S Thorne; John L Hankinson; David M Umbach; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Stephanie J London Journal: Thorax Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 9.139