Literature DB >> 25665674

Effects of Intra-abdominally Instilled Isotonic Saline on Pain, Recovery, and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study.

C Barthelsson1, G Sandblom, S Ljesevic-Nikoletic, F Hammarqvist.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative installation of isotonic saline in the abdomen has been suggested as a method to reduce the effect of local toxins, thereby reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this randomized prospective double-blind trial was to assess whether installation of isotonic saline can reduce postoperative pain and nausea following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS: Altogether 71 LC patients were randomized to either intra-abdominal instillation of isotonic saline group (S) (n = 36) or no saline (NS) group (n = 35) at the end of surgery. Data were collected by means of questionnaires. The postoperative recovery profile questionnaire was answered prior to surgery and 1 week postoperatively, SF-36 prior to surgery and at 1 month postoperatively, and a pain diary recording a Visual Analogue Scale score each day during the first week.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 94%. No significant differences were seen between the groups regarding abdominal and shoulder pain. However, the NS group reported more pain (NS = 53 %, S = 29 %) and fatigue (NS = 50%, S = 35%) than the S group postoperative day 7. Moreover, the most frequently reported problem in both groups 7 days after surgery was getting back to normal life (60%). Females reported a slower recovery profile than males and also more postoperative symptoms day 7. HRQoL results were similar between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Instillation of isotonic saline does not improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain was more often reported in the NS group than in the S group, though the difference was not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25665674     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-2978-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  25 in total

1.  The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population.

Authors:  M Sullivan; J Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden.

Authors:  M Sullivan; J Karlsson; J E Ware
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  José Ma Quintana; Jose Cabriada; Inmaculada Aróstegui; Victor Oribe; Luis Perdigo; Mercedes Varona; Amaia Bilbao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; B Klarskov; V B Kristiansen; T Callesen; S Schulze; H Kehlet; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Changes in quality-of-life following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients with cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Hen-Hui Lien; Chi-Cheng Huang; Pa-Chun Wang; Ching-Shui Huang; Ya-Hui Chen; Tzung-Li Lin; Meng-Chao Tsai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: effects of intraperitoneal local anesthetics on pain control--a randomized prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Bestoun H Ahmed; Aryan Ahmed; Dongfeng Tan; Ziad T Awad; Ali Yousef Al-Aali; John Kilkenny; Frank A Orlando; Abbas Al-Chalabi; Richard Crass; Sadir J Alrawi
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Post-cholecystectomy quality of life: a prospective multicenter cohort study of its associations with preoperative functional status and patient demographics.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Hao-Hsien Lee; Yih-Huei Uen; Jinn-Tsong Tsai; Chong-Chi Chiu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion for postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E C Tsimoyiannis; P Siakas; A Tassis; E T Lekkas; H Tzourou; M Kambili
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can simple perioperative measures improve quality of recovery following ambulatory laparoscopic surgery in females? An open prospective randomised cohort study, comparing nutritional preoperative drink and chewing gum during recovery to standard care.

Authors:  Emma Öbrink; Johanna Lerström; Christian Hillström; Eva Oddby; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.