Literature DB >> 25662991

[Timing of esophagectomy in multimodal therapy of esophageal cancer: Impact of time interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery on outcome and response].

A-K Müller1, C Lenschow, D Palmes, N Senninger, R Hummel, K Lindner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy [n(R)CT] has become the standard of care in the multimodal therapy concept for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer; however, optimal timing of surgery is not clearly defined.
OBJECTIVES: The study analyzed whether the length of the interval between completion of n(R)CT and surgery can affect the postoperative outcome, tumor response and long-term survival.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, treated between 2006 and 2013, were included in this study. On the basis of the median time interval to surgery, patients were divided into two groups [group A ≤ 40 days (n = 54) and group B > 40 days (n = 52)] and compared concerning demographic data, preoperative risk scores, morbidity, outcome, tumor response and long-term survival.
RESULTS: The groups were comparable in terms of demographics, preoperative condition of the patients, complications and outcome; however, group A showed a trend towards a higher mortality risk as preoperatively assessed by the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity in esophagogastric surgery patients (O-POSSUM) (p = 0.064) and group B showed a trend towards a higher rate of complete responders (p = 0.097).
CONCLUSION: Concerning perioperative morbidity and mortality, delayed surgery after n(R)CT showed no benefit for the patient's outcome; however, the rate of complete tumor response was higher in patients with a time interval of more than 40 days, although this did not influence long-term survival or recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25662991     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-014-2916-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  17 in total

1.  Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: does delayed surgery have an impact on outcome?

Authors:  Alberto Ruol; Christian Rizzetto; Carlo Castoro; Matteo Cagol; Rita Alfieri; Gianpietro Zanchettin; Francesco Cavallin; Silvia Michieletto; Gianfranco Da Dalt; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Luigi Corti; Silvia Mantoan; Giovanni Zaninotto; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  What is the optimal interval between chemoradiation and esophagectomy?

Authors:  Linda W Martin
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012

3.  Preoperative risk analysis--a reliable predictor of postoperative outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy?

Authors:  W Schröder; E Bollschweiler; C Kossow; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity after esophagectomy: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: does delayed surgery impact outcome?

Authors:  Chien-Hong Chiu; Yin-Kai Chao; Hsien-Kun Chang; Chen-Kan Tseng; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Yun-Hen Liu; Wei-Hsun Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katrin M Sjoquist; Bryan H Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; John R Zalcberg; R John Simes; Andrew Barbour; Val Gebski
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Val Gebski; Bryan Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; Kerwyn Foo; John Zalcberg; John Simes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Does neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer increase postoperative morbidity or mortality?

Authors:  B Mungo; D Molena; M Stem; S C Yang; R J Battafarano; M V Brock; A O Lidor
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Susanne Blank; Karen Becker; Rupert Langer; Wilko Weichert; Wilfried Roth; Leila Sisic; Annika Stange; Dirk Jäger; Markus Büchler; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Esophagectomy after chemoradiation: who and when to operate.

Authors:  Jae Y Kim; Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012
View more
  3 in total

1.  A case of IV degree on acute radiation dermatitis in China.

Authors:  Zhen Shen; Ya-Hong Chen; Yue Chen; Yan Chen; Zhe Lv; Hai-Cheng Gao
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-02

2.  Association between time interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery and complete histological tumor response in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a national cohort study.

Authors:  F Klevebro; K Nilsson; M Lindblad; S Ekman; J Johansson; L Lundell; N Ndegwa; J Hedberg; M Nilsson
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Economic Burden of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy Compared to Alternative Therapy Methods in Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Eichelmann; Sarah Ismail; Jennifer Merten; Patrycja Slepecka; Daniel Palmes; Mike G Laukötter; Andreas Pascher; Wolf Arif Mardin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.