Literature DB >> 17329193

Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Val Gebski1, Bryan Burmeister, B Mark Smithers, Kerwyn Foo, John Zalcberg, John Simes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resectable oesophageal cancer is often treated with surgery alone or with preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. We aimed to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy versus surgery alone by a meta-analysis of randomised trial data.
METHODS: Eligible trials were identified first from earlier published meta-analyses and systematic reviews. We also used MEDLINE, Cancerlit, and EMBASE databases to identify additional studies and published abstracts from major scientific meetings since 1980. Only randomised studies with an analysis by an intention-to-treat principle were included, and searches were restricted to those databases citing articles in English. We used published hazard ratios if available or estimates from other survival data or survival curves. Treatment effects by type of tumour and treatment sequencing were also investigated.
FINDINGS: Ten randomised comparisons of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone (n=1209) and eight of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone (n=1724) in patients with local operable oesophageal carcinoma were identified. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.93; p=0.002), corresponding to a 13% absolute difference in survival at 2 years, with similar results for different histological tumour types: 0.84 (0.71-0.99; p=0.04) for squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC), and 0.75 (0.59-0.95; p=0.02) for adenocarcinoma. The hazard ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 0.90 (0.81-1.00; p=0.05), which indicates a 2-year absolute survival benefit of 7%. There was no significant effect on all-cause mortality of chemotherapy for patients with SCC (hazard ratio 0.88 [0.75-1.03]; p=0.12), although there was a significant benefit for those with adenocarcinoma (0.78 [0.64-0.95]; p=0.014).
INTERPRETATION: A significant survival benefit was evident for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and, to a lesser extent, for chemotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. The findings provide an evidence-based framework for the use of neoadjuvant treatment in management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329193     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70039-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  347 in total

1.  Impact of partial-volume effect correction on the predictive and prognostic value of baseline 18F-FDG PET images in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Adrien Le Pogam; Dimitris Visvikis; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Helical tomotherapy for radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer: a preferred plan?

Authors:  Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Comparison Between Concurrent Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery vs. Surgery for Locally Advanced Cancer of Esophagus.

Authors:  Binay Thakur; Chun Shan Zhang; Yang Guo; Robin Lama
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve survival outcomes for esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Bin Wang; Xun Zhang; Hong-Li Han; Yi-Jun Xu; Da-Qiang Sun; Zhen-Liang Shi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas P Campbell; Victoria M Villaflor
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Vosmik; Jiri Petera; Igor Sirak; Miroslav Hodek; Petr Paluska; Jiri Dolezal; Marcela Kopacova
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

8.  Characterization of cluster of differentiation 47 expression and its potential as a therapeutic target in esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zhao; Shuang Yu; Shu-Hui Wang; Shi-Gang Li; Zhi-Ju Wang; Sheng-Na Han
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned.

Authors:  Mark B Orringer; Becky Marshall; Andrew C Chang; Julia Lee; Allan Pickens; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Overall survival analysis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Faisal A Siddiqui; Katelyn M Atkins; Brian S Diggs; Charles R Thomas; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.