Literature DB >> 23269519

Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor.

Katja Ott1, Susanne Blank, Karen Becker, Rupert Langer, Wilko Weichert, Wilfried Roth, Leila Sisic, Annika Stange, Dirk Jäger, Markus Büchler, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert, Florian Lordick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinomas. Despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage dies from tumor recurrence. The aim of this retrospective exploratory study from two academic centers was to identify predictors of survival and recurrence in histopathologically responding patients.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty one patients with adenocarcinomas (esophagus: n = 185, stomach: n = 46, cT3/4, cN0/+, cM0) treated with preoperative chemotherapy (n = 212) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19) followed by resection achieved a histopathological response (regression 1a: no residual tumor (n = 58), and regression 1b < 10 % residual tumor (n = 173)).
RESULTS: The estimated median overall survival was 92.4 months (5-year survival, 56.6 %) for all patients. For patients with regression 1a, median survival is not reached (5-year survival, 71.6 %) compared to patients with regression 1b with 75.3 months median (5-year survival, 52.2 %) (p = 0.031). Patients with a regression 1a had lymph node metastases in 19.0 versus 33.7 % in regression 1b. The ypT-category (p < 0.001), the M-category (p = 0.005), and the type of treatment (p = 0.04) were found to be independent prognostic factors in R0-resected patients. The recurrence rate was 31.7 % (n = 66) (local, 39.4 %; peritoneal carcinomatosis, 25.7 %; distant metastases, 50 %). Recurrence was predicted by female gender (p = 0.013), ypT-category (p = 0.007), and M-category (p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Response of the primary tumor does not guarantee recurrence-free long-term survival, but histopathological complete responders have better prognosis compared to partial responders. Established prognostic factors strongly influence the outcome, which could, in the future, be used for stratification of adjuvant treatment approaches. Increasing the rate of histopathological complete responders is a valid endpoint for future clinical trials investigating new drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23269519     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-1039-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  35 in total

1.  Surgical pathology stage by American Joint Commission on Cancer criteria predicts patient survival after preoperative chemoradiation for localized gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Pooja R Rohatgi; Paul F Mansfield; Christopher H Crane; Tsung-Teh Wu; Punita K Sunder; William A Ross; Jeffrey S Morris; Peter W Pisters; Barry W Feig; Leonard L Gunderson; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging.

Authors:  W A Weber; K Ott; K Becker; H J Dittler; H Helmberger; N E Avril; G Meisetschläger; R Busch; J R Siewert; M Schwaiger; U Fink
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Sylvie Lorenzen; Susanne Blank; Florian Lordick; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Characterization of pathologic complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in carcinoma of the esophagus and outcome after pathologic complete response.

Authors:  Pooja Rohatgi; Stephen G Swisher; Arlene M Correa; Tsung-T Wu; Zhongxing Liao; Ritsuko Komaki; Garrett L Walsh; Ara A Vaporciyan; David C Rice; Jack A Roth; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Early metabolic response evaluation by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography allows in vivo testing of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer: long-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Ken Herrmann; Florian Lordick; Hinrich Wieder; Wolfgang A Weber; Karen Becker; Andreas K Buck; Martin Dobritz; Ulrich Fink; Kurt Ulm; Tibor Schuster; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Response evaluation by endoscopy, rebiopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately predict histopathologic regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Ralf Metzger; Hartmut Schaefer; Frank Baumgarten; Daniel Vallbohmer; Jan Brabender; Eva Wolfgarten; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Stephan E Baldus; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Katja Ott; Marcus Feith; Florian Lordick; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Karen Becker
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as initial therapy for patients with advanced gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Syed M Kazmi; Jagriti Jhamb; E Lin; James C Yao; James L Abbruzzese; Linus Ho; Jaffer Ajani; Alexandria Phan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Recurrence and survival after pathologic complete response to preoperative therapy followed by surgery for gastric or gastrooesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  R C Fields; V E Strong; M Gönen; K A Goodman; N P Rizk; D P Kelsen; D H Ilson; L H Tang; M F Brennan; D G Coit; M A Shah
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer: Should we use prognostic factors to select patients?

Authors:  Linda Agolli; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici; Mattia Falchetto Osti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  [Timing of esophagectomy in multimodal therapy of esophageal cancer: Impact of time interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery on outcome and response].

Authors:  A-K Müller; C Lenschow; D Palmes; N Senninger; R Hummel; K Lindner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Leila Sisic; Moritz J Strowitzki; Susanne Blank; Henrik Nienhueser; Sara Dorr; Georg Martin Haag; Dirk Jäger; Katja Ott; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Prognostic nomogram for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction patients with and without neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhenjiang Guo; Ning Wang; Fangzhen Liu; Qun Zhao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  The effect of histologic grade on neoadjuvant treatment outcomes in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David T Pointer; Jordan A McDonald; Samer A Naffouje; Rutika Mehta; Jason B Fleming; Jacques P Fontaine; Gregory Y Lauwers; Jessica M Frakes; Sarah E Hoffe; Jose M Pimiento
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  ypTNM staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Chinese gastric cancer population: an evaluation on the prognostic value of the AJCC eighth edition cancer staging system.

Authors:  Ziyu Li; Yinkui Wang; Fei Shan; Xiangji Ying; Zhouqiao Wu; Kan Xue; Rulin Miao; Yan Zhang; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Tumor regression and survival after perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in carcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Fernando Mingol; Javier Gallego; Albina Orduña; Amparo Martinez-Blasco; Javier Sola-Vera; Pedro Moya; Miguel Angel Morcillo; Juan Antonio Ruiz; Rafael Calpena; Francisco-Javier Lacueva
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  T Schmidt; L Sicic; S Blank; K Becker; W Weichert; T Bruckner; T Parakonthun; R Langer; M W Büchler; J-R Siewert; F Lordick; K Ott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an independent adverse prognostic factor in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michaela Aichler; Martin Motschmann; Uta Jütting; Birgit Luber; Karen Becker; Katja Ott; Florian Lordick; Rupert Langer; Marcus Feith; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert; Axel Walch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.