| Literature DB >> 25658240 |
Davide Grassi1, Richard Draijer2, Giovambattista Desideri3, Theo Mulder4, Claudio Ferri5.
Abstract
Hypertension and arterial stiffening are independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality. Flavonoids may exert some vascular protection. We investigated the effects of black tea on blood pressure (BP) and wave reflections before and after fat load in hypertensives. According to a randomized, double-blind, controlled, cross-over design, 19 patients were assigned to consume black tea (129 mg flavonoids) or placebo twice a day for eight days (13 day wash-out period). Digital volume pulse and BP were measured before and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after tea consumption. Measurements were performed in a fasted state and after a fat load. Compared to placebo, reflection index and stiffness index decreased after tea consumption (p<0.0001). Fat challenge increased wave reflection, which was counteracted by tea consumption (p<0.0001). Black tea decreased systolic and diastolic BP (-3.2 mmHg, p<0.005 and -2.6 mmHg, p<0.0001; respectively) and prevented BP increase after a fat load (p<0.0001). Black tea consumption lowers wave reflections and BP in the fasting state, and during the challenging haemodynamic conditions after a fat load in hypertensives. Considering lipemia-induced impairment of arterial function may occur frequently during the day, our findings suggest regular consumption of black tea may be relevant for cardiovascular protection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25658240 PMCID: PMC4344573 DOI: 10.3390/nu7021037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of the test products (mg per dose).
| Placebo | Active Treatment | |
|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols | 0 | 150 |
| Total Caffeine | 37.3 | 37.3 |
| Tea solids | - | 497.5 |
| Caffeine added | 37.3 | - |
| Caramel colour | 90 | - |
| Tea flavour | 10 | - |
| Sucrose | 1362.7 | 1402.5 |
| Total weight of sachet | 1500 | 1900 |
General characteristics of the study population (mean ± SD).
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of subjects (total/males) | 19 / 5M |
| Age (years) | 51.3 ± 8.2 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 27.1 ± 1.2 |
| Body Weight (Kg) | 73.7 ± 7.2 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 141.1 ± 27.3 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 45.7 ± 8.2 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 116.8 ± 38.1 |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 86.8 ± 7.3 |
| Plasma insulin (μU/mL) | 11.3 ± 5.4 |
Effect of black tea on haemodynamic parameters after one week intervention measured in the fasted state.
| parameter | placebo | black tea | difference (95% CI) | Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 144.5 ± 0.2 | 141.1 ± 0.2 | −3.3 (−4.3, −2.3) | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 90.6 ± 0.2 | 88.1 ± 0.2 | −2.5 (−3.3, −1.8) | <0.0001 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 72.0 ± 0.3 | 70.8 ± 0.3 | −1.2 (−2.3, 0.0) | <0.05 |
| Pulse Pressure (mmHg) | 53.9 ± 0.2 | 53.6 ± 0.2 | −0.3 (−1.3, 0.7) | n.s. |
| Peak to peak time (ms) | 198.9 ± 2.2 | 224.1 ± 2.3 | 25.1 (15.6, 34.6) | <0.0001 |
| Reflection Index (%) | 69.9 ± 0.7 | 64.6 ± 0.6 | −5.2 (−7.9, −2.6) | <0.001 |
| Stiffness Index (m/s) | 8.2 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | −0.7 (−1.0, −0.5) | <0.0001 |
Values are LSmeans ± SEM, difference tea-placebo with 95% confidence interval (95% CI); Data are the mean values calculated from t1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the last test dose, and analyzed by ANCOVA with the baseline value, gender, age and BMI taken as covariables; BP = blood pressure; n.s. = not significant.
Figure 1Effect of 1 week placebo (white) and black tea (black) administration on baseline (square) values (Panel A and B) of stiffness index and acute effects without and with fat load (Panel A and B). Data are presented as LSmeans ± SE. In all panels vertical lines indicate SE and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences with respect the placebo phase (Panel A and B) while circles (°) indicate significant differences from baseline values (Panel A and B). Differences are considered significant when p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of 1 week placebo (white) and black tea (black) administration on baseline (square) values (Panel A and B) of reflection index and acute effects without and with fat load (Panel A and B). Data are presented as LSmeans ± SE. In all panels vertical lines indicate SE and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences with respect the placebo phase (Panel A and B) while circles (°) indicate significant differences from baseline values (Panel A and B). Differences are considered significant when p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of 1 week placebo (white) and black tea (black) administration on baseline (square) values (Panel A and B) of systolic blood pressure and acute effects without and with fat load (Panel A and B). Data are presented as LSmeans ± SE. In all panels vertical lines indicate SE and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences with respect the placebo phase (Panel A and B) while circles (°) indicate significant differences from baseline values (Panel A and B). Differences are considered significant when p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of 1 week placebo (white) and black tea (black) administration on baseline (square) values (Panel A and B) of diastolic blood pressure and acute effects without and with fat load (Panel A and B). Data are presented as LSmeans ± SE. In all panels vertical lines indicate SE and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences with respect the placebo phase (Panel A and B) while circles (°) indicate significant differences from baseline values (Panel A and B). Differences are considered significant when p < 0.05.
Effect of black tea on haemodynamic parameters after 8 days’ intervention measured in the postprandial state.
| parameter | placebo | black tea | difference (95% CI) | Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP (mmHg) | 146.7 ± 0.2 | 143.5 ± 0.2 | −3.2 (−4.2, −2.2) | <0.0001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 92.5 ± 0.2 | 90.5 ± 0.2 | −2.0 (−2.7,−1.2) | <0.0001 |
| HR (bpm) | 71.4 ± 0.3 | 71.4 ± 0.3 | −0.0 (−1.2, 1.1) | n.s. |
| PP (mmHg) | 54.3 ± 0.2 | 53.4 ± 0.2 | −1.0 (−2.0, 0.0) | n.s. |
| PPT (ms) | 170 ± 2.3 | 203 ± 2.2 | 33.9 (24.6, 43.3) | <0.0001 |
| RI (%) | 76.3 ± 0.7 | 70.4 ± 0.6 | −5.9 (−8.5, −3.3) | <0.0001 |
| SI (m/s) | 9.8 ± 0.1 | 8.3 ± 0.1 | −1.5 (−1.8, −1.2) | <0.0001 |
Values are LSmeans ± SEM, difference tea-placebo with 95% confidence interval (95% CI); Data are the mean values calculated from t1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the last test dose, and analyzed by ANCOVA with the baseline value, gender, age and BMI taken as covariables; SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HR = Heart rate, PP = pulse pressure, PPT = peak to peak time, RI = reflection Index, SI = stiffness index. n.s. = not significant.
Figure 5Arterial stiffness and wave reflections are known to play a fundamental role in cardiovascular health and disease. Indeed, in interplay with left ventricular ejection and the elastic properties of the aorta, wave reflections could specifically increase central pulse pressure, a recognized predictor of cardiovascular risk. These changes are attributed to the timing and amplitude of pulse wave reflections from peripheral reflecting sites, where high resistance arterioles are considered to be the major sites of wave reflection in the circulation.