Literature DB >> 18221380

Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nathaniel P Sharp1, Aneil F Agrawal.   

Abstract

Deleterious alleles constantly enter populations via mutation. Their presence reduces mean fitness and may threaten population persistence. It has been suggested that sexual selection may be an efficient way by which deleterious alleles are removed from populations but there is little direct experimental evidence. Because of its potential role in mutational meltdowns, there is particular interest in whether the strength of sexual selection changes with density. For each of eight visible markers in Drosophila melanogaster we have compared the strength of sexual selection at two densities. We find evidence of strong sexual selection against most but not all of these alleles. There is no evidence that sexual selection tends to be stronger (or weaker) at high density relative to low density. In addition, we also measure the effects of these mutations on two key parameters relevant to population productivity--juvenile viability and female fecundity. In most cases, sexual selection is as strong or stronger than these other forms of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18221380     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Are males the more 'sensitive' sex?

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  B Hollis; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  The fitness effects of a point mutation in Escherichia coli change with founding population density.

Authors:  Huansheng Cao; Gordon R Plague
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sean C A Clark; Nathaniel P Sharp; Locke Rowe; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inbreeding alters intersexual fitness correlations in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Eoin Duffy; Richa Joag; Jacek Radwan; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Courtship song does not increase the rate of adaptation to a thermally stressful environment in a Drosophila melanogaster laboratory population.

Authors:  Larry G Cabral; Brett Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.