Literature DB >> 21967424

Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.

Katrina McGuigan1, Donna Petfield, Mark W Blows.   

Abstract

Mutation load is a key parameter in evolutionary theories, but relatively little empirical information exists on the mutation load of populations, or the elimination of this load through selection. We manipulated the opportunity for sexual selection within a mutation accumulation divergence experiment to determine how sexual selection on males affected the accumulation of mutations contributing to sexual and nonsexual fitness. Sexual selection prevented the accumulation of mutations affecting male mating success, the target trait, as well as reducing mutation load on productivity, a nonsexual fitness component. Mutational correlations between mating success and productivity (estimated in the absence of sexual selection) were positive. Sexual selection significantly reduced these fitness component correlations. Male mating success significantly diverged between sexual selection treatments, consistent with the fixation of genetic differences. However, the rank of the treatments was not consistent across assays, indicating that the mutational effects on mating success were conditional on biotic and abiotic context. Our experiment suggests that greater insight into the genetic targets of natural and sexual selection can be gained by focusing on mutational rather than standing genetic variation, and on the behavior of trait variances rather than means.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967424     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01346.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.

Authors:  N P Sharp; C M Vincent
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sex, mutations and marketing. How the Cambrian explosion set the stage for runaway consumerism.

Authors:  Geoffrey Miller
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Pleiotropic mutations are subject to strong stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Julie M Collet; Scott L Allen; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The nature and extent of mutational pleiotropy in gene expression of male Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; Julie M Collet; Elizabeth A McGraw; Yixin H Ye; Scott L Allen; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The evolutionary consequences of disrupted male mating signals: an agent-based modelling exploration of endocrine disrupting chemicals in the guppy.

Authors:  Alistair McNair Senior; Shinichi Nakagawa; Volker Grimm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Courtship song does not increase the rate of adaptation to a thermally stressful environment in a Drosophila melanogaster laboratory population.

Authors:  Larry G Cabral; Brett Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.

Authors:  Karl Grieshop; David Berger; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Single-Molecule Sequencing of the Drosophila serrata Genome.

Authors:  Scott L Allen; Emily K Delaney; Artyom Kopp; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A Genomic Reference Panel for Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Adam J Reddiex; Scott L Allen; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.