Literature DB >> 25648256

[The use of tantalum cones for reconstruction of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty].

M Gebauer1, T Gehrke, O Jakobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Revision arthroplasty of the knee is often associated with substantial femoral and/or tibial bone loss. Tantalum cones are used to reconstruct these defects and to improve initial stability. This requires an implantation in the "press-fit" technique with maximum contact to the host bone. INDICATIONS: Tantalum cones may be used in grade 2-3 femoral and/or tibial defects according to the AORI (Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute) classification system. CONTRAINDICATIONS: There are no contraindications described. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After removal of the implant and cement remnants, bone defects have to be evaluated. A tantalum cone which adequately fills the bone defect is implanted using the "press-fit" technique. If necessary, saving resection of surplus bone to fit the cone properly. Gaps between the cone and the host bone are filled with cancellous bone in "impaction-bone-grafting" technique to increase the area of contact. Fitting the revision knee prosthesis and fixing with the use of bone cement. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Postoperative physiotherapy is adjusted to the result of the reconstruction. In most cases with stable reconstruction, mobilization with full weight-bearing and the use of two crutches can be performed. Additional bone grafting may require a partial weight-bearing regimen for postoperative mobilization. Physiotherapy to improve range of motion is performed starting on postoperative day 1.
RESULTS: Several studies reported promising midterm results (observation period about 36 months) after implantation of tantalum cones in revision knee arthroplasty. There is consistent evidence for stable osteointegration of the cones. The main intraoperative complication is fracture of the host bone during impaction of the cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25648256     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-014-0332-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  12 in total

1.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; G J Stackpool; S A Hacking; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.

Authors:  Robert Cohen
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation: knee.

Authors:  G A Engh; D J Ammeen
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Christian R Schmitz; Wolfgang Klauser; Mustafa Citak; Hesham Al-Khateeb; Thorsten Gehrke; Daniel Kendoff
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Bone loss following knee arthroplasty: potential treatment options.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Philippe Beaufils; Simone Cerciello; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Basilio De la Torre-Escudero; José M Rojo-Manaute; Antonio Ríos-Luna; Francisco Chana-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.

Authors:  B M Rao; T T Kamal; J Vafaye; M Moss
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Primary human osteoblasts grow into porous tantalum and maintain an osteoblastic phenotype.

Authors:  Katie J Welldon; Gerald J Atkins; Donald W Howie; David M Findlay
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  Verena Hilgen; Mustafa Citak; Eik Vettorazzi; Carl Haasper; Kimberly Day; Michael Amling; Thorsten Gehrke; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.