Literature DB >> 25644682

Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability: a meta-analysis of 77,299 patients.

Chenhui Tai1, Yuxi Sun, Neng Dai, Dachun Xu, Wei Chen, Jiguang Wang, Athanase Protogerou, Thomas T van Sloten, Jacques Blacher, Michel E Safar, Yi Zhang, Yawei Xu.   

Abstract

In recent clinical investigations, visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability was proven as a predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. However, inconsistent results exist in this association. A meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of visit-to-visit SBP variability by different parameters in 77,299 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. The pooled age- and mean SBP-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.04; P<.001) per 1-mm Hg increase in SBP standard deviation (SD) and 1.04 (1.02-1.06, P<.001) per 1% in SBP coefficient of variation, and the corresponding values of cardiovascular mortality were 1.10 (1.02-1.17, P<.001) and 1.01 (0.99-1.03, P=.32), respectively. Moreover, a 1-mm Hg increase in SD was significantly associated with stroke, with an HR of 1.02 (1.01-1.03, P<.001). Visit-to-visit SBP variability, independent of age and mean SBP, is a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and stroke.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25644682      PMCID: PMC8031983          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  45 in total

1.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability.

Authors:  Luis Mena; Salvador Pintos; Nestor V Queipo; José A Aizpúrua; Gladys Maestre; Tulio Sulbarán
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; L Thijs; R Fagard; E T O'Brien; D Clement; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; C Nachev; P Palatini; G Parati; J Tuomilehto; J Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term visit-to-visit office blood pressure variability increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Francesca Mallamaci; Roberto Minutolo; Daniela Leonardis; Graziella D'Arrigo; Giovanni Tripepi; Francesco Rapisarda; Teresa Cicchetti; Igina Maimone; Giuseppe Enia; Maurizio Postorino; Domenico Santoro; Giorgio Fuiano; Luca De Nicola; Giuseppe Conte; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of blood pressure variability.

Authors:  G Mancia; G Grassi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 6.  Barriers to and determinants of medication adherence in hypertension management: perspective of the cohort study of medication adherence among older adults.

Authors:  Marie A Krousel-Wood; Paul Muntner; Tareq Islam; Donald E Morisky; Larry S Webber
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Risk of cardiovascular events among women with high normal blood pressure or blood pressure progression: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Conen; Paul M Ridker; Julie E Buring; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-19

8.  2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redón; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension.

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell; Sally C Howard; Eamon Dolan; Eoin O'Brien; Joanna E Dobson; Bjorn Dahlöf; Peter S Sever; Neil R Poulter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Prevalence and predictors of poor antihypertensive medication adherence in an urban health clinic setting.

Authors:  Amanda D Hyre; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Paul Muntner; Lumie Kawasaki; Karen B DeSalvo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  20 in total

1.  Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.

Authors:  Chenkai Wu; Michael G Shlipak; Robert S Stawski; Carmen A Peralta; Bruce M Psaty; Tamara B Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Eric J Shiroma; Anne B Newman; Michelle C Odden
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Blood pressure (BP) assessment-from BP level to BP variability.

Authors:  Janusz Feber; Mieczyslaw Litwin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 3.  Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure: Is it time to recommend for all patients with hypertension?

Authors:  Yalcin Solak; Kazuomi Kario; Adrian Covic; Nathan Bertelsen; Baris Afsar; Abdullah Ozkok; Andrzej Wiecek; Mehmet Kanbay
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.801

4.  Association of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in general population.

Authors:  Liye Dai; Lu Song; Xiaoli Li; Yuling Yang; Xiaoming Zheng; Yuntao Wu; Chunhui Li; Hualing Zhao; Yilong Wang; Shouling Wu; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Blood Pressure Variability Provides Useful and Prognostic Information on the White-Coat Effect Among Older Patients.

Authors:  Cengiz Ozturk; Ahmet Ozturk; Mustafa Demir; Ali Osman Yildirim; Sevket Balta; Mustafa Aparci; Murat Unlu; Sait Demirkol
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement Provides True and Prognostic Information on Blood Pressure Variability in Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Cengiz Ozturk; Serdar Sadir; Ahmet Ozturk; Mustafa Aparci
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: more to come.

Authors:  Eleni Gavriilaki; Eugenia Gkaliagkousi; Stella Douma
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability: a meta-analysis of 77,299 patients.

Authors:  Chenhui Tai; Yuxi Sun; Neng Dai; Dachun Xu; Wei Chen; Jiguang Wang; Athanase Protogerou; Thomas T van Sloten; Jacques Blacher; Michel E Safar; Yi Zhang; Yawei Xu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Systolic blood pressure postural changes variability is associated with greater dementia risk.

Authors:  Laure Rouch; Jean-Sébastien Vidal; Tina Hoang; Philippe Cestac; Olivier Hanon; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 11.800

10.  Impact of in-hospital blood pressure variability on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Ayman Khairy Mohamed Hassan; Hatem Abd-El Rahman; Kerolos Mohsen; Salwa R Dimitry
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.