Literature DB >> 17704543

Risk of cardiovascular events among women with high normal blood pressure or blood pressure progression: prospective cohort study.

David Conen1, Paul M Ridker, Julie E Buring, Robert J Glynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cardiovascular risk among women with high normal blood pressure (130-9/85-9 mm Hg) against those with normal blood pressure (120-9/75-84 mm Hg) and those with baseline hypertension.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Women's health study, United States. PARTICIPANTS: 39 322 initially healthy women classified into four categories according to self reported baseline blood pressure and followed for a median of 10.2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major cardiovascular event-primary end point); progression to hypertension.
RESULTS: 982 (2.5%) women developed a major cardiovascular event, and 8686 (30.1%) women without baseline hypertension progressed to hypertension. The age adjusted event rate for the primary end point was 1.6/1000 person years among women with normal blood pressure, 2.9/1000 person years among those with high normal blood pressure, and 4.3/1000 person years among those with baseline hypertension. Compared with women with high normal blood pressure (reference group), those with normal blood pressure had a lower risk of a major cardiovascular event (adjusted hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.76) and of incident hypertension (0.42, 0.40 to 0.44). The hazard ratio for a major cardiovascular event in women with baseline hypertension was 1.30 (1.08 to 1.57). Women who progressed to hypertension (reference group) during the first 48 months of the study had a higher cardiovascular risk than those who remained normotensive (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64, 0.50 to 0.81). Women with high normal blood pressure at baseline who progressed to hypertension (reference group) had similar outcome rates to women with baseline hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio 1.17, 0.88 to 1.55).
CONCLUSION: The cardiovascular risk of women with high normal blood pressure is higher than that of women with normal blood pressure. The cardiovascular risk of women who progress to hypertension is increased shortly after a diagnosis of hypertension has been made. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00000479 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704543      PMCID: PMC1962877          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39269.672188.AE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  32 in total

1.  Age-specific correlation analysis of longitudinal blood pressure data.

Authors:  B Rosner; C H Hennekens; E H Kass; W E Miall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 15-21       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Appel; Catherine M Champagne; David W Harsha; Lawton S Cooper; Eva Obarzanek; Patricia J Elmer; Victor J Stevens; William M Vollmer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Laura P Svetkey; Sarah W Stedman; Deborah R Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Apr 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of weight loss and sodium reduction intervention on blood pressure and hypertension incidence in overweight people with high-normal blood pressure. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-24

5.  Long-term reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  G A Mansoor; E J McCabe; W B White
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  John Danesh; Jeremy G Wheeler; Gideon M Hirschfield; Shinichi Eda; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Ann Rumley; Gordon D O Lowe; Mark B Pepys; Vilmundur Gudnason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  L J Appel; T J Moore; E Obarzanek; W M Vollmer; L P Svetkey; F M Sacks; G A Bray; T M Vogt; J A Cutler; M M Windhauser; P H Lin; N Karanja
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; P Martin; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; L Sampson; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  29 in total

1.  Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Korean Young Adults According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines With Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease Events.

Authors:  Joung Sik Son; Seulggie Choi; Kyuwoong Kim; Sung Min Kim; Daein Choi; Gyeongsil Lee; Su-Min Jeong; Seong Yong Park; Yeon-Yong Kim; Jae-Moon Yun; Sang Min Park
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reassessing normal blood pressure.

Authors:  Ira S Nash
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-01

3.  Discovery and replication of novel blood pressure genetic loci in the Women's Genome Health Study.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ho; Daniel Levy; Lynda Rose; Andrew D Johnson; Paul M Ridker; Daniel I Chasman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  The relative importance of systolic versus diastolic blood pressure control and incident symptomatic peripheral artery disease in women.

Authors:  Tiffany M Powell; Robert J Glynn; Julie E Buring; Mark A Creager; Paul M Ridker; Aruna D Pradhan
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  High normal blood pressure: to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  A Ahmed; R Senior
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 6.  Prehypertension--prevalence, health risks, and management strategies.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Sean Stevens-Fabry
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Socioeconomic status, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension in a prospective cohort of female health professionals.

Authors:  David Conen; Robert J Glynn; Paul M Ridker; Julie E Buring; Michelle A Albert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Influence of blood pressure and blood pressure change on the risk of congestive heart failure in the elderly.

Authors:  David Conen; Claudia U Chae; Jack M Guralnik; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Association of renin-angiotensin and endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms with blood pressure progression and incident hypertension: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Conen; Robert J Glynn; Julie E Buring; Paul M Ridker; Robert Y L Zee
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 10.  Treatment of prehypertension in diabetes and metabolic syndrome: what are the pros?

Authors:  Julian Segura; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.