Literature DB >> 16563954

A simple correction for B1 field errors in magnetization transfer ratio measurements.

Rebecca S Samson1, Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott, Mark R Symms, Daniel J Tozer, Paul S Tofts.   

Abstract

B1 errors are a problem in magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) measurements because the MTR value is dependent on the amplitude of the magnetization transfer (MT) pulse. B1 errors can arise from radiofrequency (RF) nonuniformity (caused by the RF coil, or skin effect and dielectric resonance in the subject's head) and also from inaccurate setting of the transmitter output when compensating for varying amounts of loading of the RF coil. B1 errors, and hence MTR errors, may be up to 5-10%, a large source of error in quantitative MR measurements. Radiofrequency nonuniformity may cause MTR histograms to be broadened. The dependence of MTR on B1 was modeled using binary spin bath theory, with a continuous wave (CW) approximation. For B1 reductions of up to 20%, normalized plots for different brain tissue types could be approximated by a single line, indicating that a systematic correction could be applied to MTR measurements with a known B1 error, regardless of tissue type. On a 1.5-T scanner with a birdcage coil, MTR was measured in 18 tissue types in five controls. The MT pulse amplitude was reduced in steps from its nominal value by up to 20%. Averaging data over all controls and tissue types resulted in a line fitting mtr(normalized)=0.812b(1normalized)+0.193, where mtr(normalized) is the normalized value of MTR (relative to its value at the nominal B1) and b(1normalized) is the normalized value of B1 (relative to its nominal value). For a 20% reduction in MT pulse amplitude (i.e., b(1normalized)=0.80), the mean MTR value for the 18 tissue types was 7.0 percent units (pu) below the correct value. After correction using the single equation above for all tissue types, all MTR values were within 1.5 pu of their correct value [root mean square (rms) error=0.7 pu]. Magnetization transfer ratio values tended to be slightly overcorrected because the simple linear correction scheme is only an approximation to the true MTR dependence on B1. A B1 field mapping technique was implemented, based on the double angle method (DAM), with fast spin-echo (FSE) readout, and TR=15 s; this took a total of 6 min of imaging time. This was used to quantify B(1) errors and correct MTR maps and histograms. However, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T1 is very long (approximately 4.2 s); thus, to achieve complete longitudinal relaxation (a requirement of the DAM B1 mapping method), an increase in TR and, hence, acquisition time would be required. In general, however, we are not interested in calculating the B1 in the CSF, although it is important that the B1 is determined in partial volume voxels around the CSF. Using our birdcage head coil, whole-brain B1 histograms were found to have full-width half maximums (FWHMs) ranging from just 6.8% to 11.5% of the nominal B1 value. The FSE DAM B1 field mapping technique was shown to be robust, although a longer TR time may be desirable to ensure complete elimination of CSF partial volume errors. The procedure can be applied on any scanner where the Euro-MT sequence is available, or alternatively, where the amplitude of B1 or of the MT pulse can be manually reduced in order to perform this type of "calibration" experiment for the particular MTR sequence used. The MTR is known to be highly dependent on the parameters of the sequence used, in particular, the MT pulse shape, flip angle, duration, and offset frequency, and the repetition time TR' between successive MT pulses. Therefore, correction schemes will differ for different MTR sequences, and new data sets would be required to calculate these different correction schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16563954     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  19 in total

1.  Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Alan J Huang; Aliya Gifford; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Jonathan A D Farrell; John A Bogovic; Jun Hua; Min Chen; Samson Jarso; Seth A Smith; Suresh Joel; Susumu Mori; James J Pekar; Peter B Barker; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Jinsuh Kim; Yin Wu; Yingkun Guo; Hairong Zheng; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Characterization of cerebral white matter properties using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging stains.

Authors:  Andrew L Alexander; Samuel A Hurley; Alexey A Samsonov; Nagesh Adluru; Ameer Pasha Hosseinbor; Pouria Mossahebi; Do P M Tromp; Elizabeth Zakszewski; Aaron S Field
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2012-01-27

4.  Targeted radiofrequency field mapping using 3D reduced field-of-view-catalyzed double-angle method.

Authors:  Dingxin Wang; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping from a single off-resonance magnetization transfer measurement.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Motion-robust cardiac B1+ mapping at 3T using interleaved bloch-siegert shifts.

Authors:  Sebastian Weingärtner; Fabian Zimmer; Gregory J Metzger; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Simultaneous measurement of T1 /B1 and pharmacokinetic model parameters using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Kerryanne Winters; Olivier Reynaud; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Rapid 3D radiofrequency field mapping using catalyzed double-angle method.

Authors:  Dingxin Wang; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Measurement of T1 and T2 in the cervical spinal cord at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Seth A Smith; Richard A E Edden; Jonathan A D Farrell; Peter B Barker; Peter C M Van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Magnetization transfer proportion: a simplified measure of dose response for polymer gel dosimetry.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.