Literature DB >> 25641532

Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) study.

John A Spertus1, Richard Bach2, Charles Bethea3, Adnan Chhatriwalla4, Jeptha P Curtis5, Elizabeth Gialde4, Mayra Guerrero6, Kensey Gosch4, Philip G Jones4, Aaron Kugelmass7, Bradley M Leonard8, Edward J McNulty9, Marc Shelton10, Henry H Ting11, Carole Decker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the process of informed consent is designed to transfer knowledge of the risks and benefits of treatment and to engage patients in shared medical decision-making, this is poorly done in routine clinical care. We assessed the impact of a novel informed consent form for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that is more simply written, includes images of the procedure, and embeds individualized estimates of outcomes on multiple domains of successful informed consent and shared decision-making.
METHODS: We interviewed 590 PCI patients receiving traditional consent documents and 527 patients receiving novel ePRISM consents at 9 US centers and compared patients' perceptions, knowledge transfer, and engagement in medical decision-making. Heterogeneity across sites was assessed and adjusted for using hierarchical models.
RESULTS: Site-adjusted analyses revealed more frequent review (72% for ePRISM vs 45% for original consents) and better understanding of the ePRISM consents (ORs=1.8-3.0, depending upon the outcome) with marked heterogeneity across sites (median relative difference [MRD] in the ORs of ePRISM's effect =2-3.2). Patients receiving ePRISM consents better understood the purposes and risks of the procedure (ORs=1.9-3.9, MRDs=1.1-6.2), engaged more in shared decision-making (proportional OR=2.1 [95% CI=1.02-4.4], MRD=2.2) and discussed stent options with their physicians (58% vs. 31%; site-adjusted odds ratio=2.7 [95% CI=1.2, 6.3], MRD=2.6) more often.
CONCLUSIONS: A personalized consent document improved the process of informed consent and shared decision-making. Marked heterogeneity across hospitals highlights that consent documents are but one aspect of engaging patients in understanding and participating in treatment.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25641532      PMCID: PMC4315511          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  21 in total

1.  Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction.

Authors:  M M Bottrell; H Alpert; R L Fischbach; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-01

2.  Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression.

Authors:  Klaus Larsen; Juan Merlo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of premature discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent placement: results from the PREMIER registry.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Richard Kettelkamp; Clifton Vance; Carole Decker; Philip G Jones; John S Rumsfeld; John C Messenger; Sanjaya Khanal; Eric D Peterson; Richard G Bach; Harlan M Krumholz; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

5.  Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Cathy A Coyne; Ronghui Xu; Peter Raich; Kathy Plomer; Mark Dignan; Lari B Wenzel; Diane Fairclough; Thomas Habermann; Linda Schnell; Susan Quella; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A shortened instrument for literacy screening.

Authors:  Pat F Bass; John F Wilson; Charles H Griffith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 8.  A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney; Amy L McGuire; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Decision-making process reported by Medicare patients who had coronary artery stenting or surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Floyd J Fowler; Patricia M Gallagher; Julie P W Bynum; Michael J Barry; F Leslie Lucas; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Rodney A Hayward; David M Kent; Sandeep Vijan; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  25 in total

1.  Health status outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in bypass grafts vs. native coronary arteries.

Authors:  Mohammed Qintar; Mohamad Omer; Fengming Tang; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus; Adam C Salisbury
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Association of smoking status with health-related outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jae-Sik Jang; Donna M Buchanan; Kensey L Gosch; Philip G Jones; Praneet K Sharma; Ali Shafiq; Anna Grodzinsky; Timothy J Fendler; Garth Graham; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Beyond restenosis: Patients' preference for drug eluting or bare metal stents.

Authors:  Mohammed Qintar; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Suzanne V Arnold; Fengming Tang; Donna M Buchanan; Ali Shafiq; Yashashwi Pokharel; Dave deBronkart; Javed M Ashraf; John A Spertus
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Predictors and variability of drug-eluting vs bare-metal stent selection in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PRISM study.

Authors:  Ali Shafiq; Kensey Gosch; Amit P Amin; Henry H Ting; John A Spertus; Adam C Salisbury
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Residual Angina After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anna Grodzinsky; Mikhail Kosiborod; Fengming Tang; Philip G Jones; Darren K McGuire; John A Spertus; John F Beltrame; Jae-Sik Jang; Abhinav Goyal; Neel M Butala; Robert W Yeh; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-09

6.  Predicting long-term bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Praneet K Sharma; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; David J Cohen; Jae-Sik Jang; Paramdeep Baweja; Kensey Gosch; Philip Jones; Richard G Bach; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Validation of the Seattle angina questionnaire in women with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Krishna K Patel; Suzanne V Arnold; Paul S Chan; Yuanyuan Tang; Philip G Jones; Jianping Guo; Donna M Buchanan; Mohammed Qintar; Carole Decker; David A Morrow; John A Spertus
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Patient satisfaction in cardiology after cardiac catheterization : Effects of treatment outcome, visit characteristics, and perception of received care.

Authors:  R R Weidemann; T Schönfelder; J Klewer; J Kugler
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.

Authors:  Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Carole Decker; Elizabeth Gialde; Delwyn Catley; Kathy Goggin; Katie Jaschke; Philip Jones; Dave deBronkart; Tony Sun; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-02

10.  Prediction of residual angina after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; Jae-Sik Jang; Fengming Tang; Garth Graham; David J Cohen; John A Spertus
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2015-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.