Literature DB >> 30764654

Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.

Adnan K Chhatriwalla1,2, Carole Decker1,2, Elizabeth Gialde1, Delwyn Catley3,4, Kathy Goggin5,6, Katie Jaschke1, Philip Jones1, Dave deBronkart7, Tony Sun8, John A Spertus1,2.   

Abstract

Background Drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but their use necessitates prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, which increases costs and bleeding risk, and which may delay elective surgeries. While >80% of patients in the United States receive drug-eluting stents, less than a third report that their physicians discussed options with them. Methods and Results An individualized shared decision-making (SDM) tool for stent selection was designed and implemented at 2 US hospitals. In the postimplementation phase, all patients received the SDM tool before their procedure, with or without decision coaching from a trained nurse. All patients were interviewed with respect to their knowledge of stents, their participation in SDM, and their stent preference. Between May 2014 and December 2016, 332 patients not receiving the SDM tool, 113 receiving the SDM tool with coaching, and 136 receiving the tool without coaching were interviewed. Patients receiving the SDM tool + coaching, as compared with usual care, demonstrated higher knowledge scores (mean difference +1.8; P<0.001), reported more frequent participation in SDM (odds ratio=2.96; P<0.001), and were more likely to state a stent preference (odds ratio=2.00; P<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the use of the SDM tool without coaching and usual care. For patients who voiced a stent preference, concordance between stent desired and stent received was 98% for patients who preferred a drug-eluting stent and 50% for patients who preferred a bare metal stent. The SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordance. Conclusions An SDM tool for stent selection was associated with improvements in patient knowledge and SDM only when accompanied by decision coaching. However, the SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordance between patients' stent preference and stent received, suggesting that physician-level barriers to SDM may exist. Clinical Trial Information URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT02046902.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; percutaneous coronary intervention; stents

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30764654      PMCID: PMC6383794          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  29 in total

1.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Cindy L Grines; Robert O Bonow; Donald E Casey; Timothy J Gardner; Peter B Lockhart; David J Moliterno; Patrick O'Gara; Patrick Whitlow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.

Authors:  Emily Oshima Lee; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Carol Bennett; Mary Ann Murray; Sarah Mullan; France Légaré
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease--a study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR).

Authors:  Ronald J Krone; Richard E Shaw; Lloyd W Klein; James C Blankenship; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Ratté; Dawn Stacey; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Karine Gravel; Ian D Graham; Stéphane Turcotte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

7.  Beyond restenosis: Patients' preference for drug eluting or bare metal stents.

Authors:  Mohammed Qintar; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Suzanne V Arnold; Fengming Tang; Donna M Buchanan; Ali Shafiq; Yashashwi Pokharel; Dave deBronkart; Javed M Ashraf; John A Spertus
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Williams; Holly A McGregor; Daryl Sharp; Chantal Levesque; Ruth W Kouides; Richard M Ryan; Edward L Deci
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events.

Authors:  Deepak L Bhatt; Keith A A Fox; Werner Hacke; Peter B Berger; Henry R Black; William E Boden; Patrice Cacoub; Eric A Cohen; Mark A Creager; J Donald Easton; Marcus D Flather; Steven M Haffner; Christian W Hamm; Graeme J Hankey; S Claiborne Johnston; Koon-Hou Mak; Jean-Louis Mas; Gilles Montalescot; Thomas A Pearson; P Gabriel Steg; Steven R Steinhubl; Michael A Weber; Danielle M Brennan; Liz Fabry-Ribaudo; Joan Booth; Eric J Topol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Understanding physician-level barriers to the use of individualized risk estimates in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Carole Decker; Linda Garavalia; Brian Garavalia; Elizabeth Gialde; Robert W Yeh; John Spertus; Adnan K Chhatriwalla
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  4 in total

1.  Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives.

Authors:  Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Douglas J Opel; Neal W Dickert; Daniel B Kramer; Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Keren Ladin; Monica E Peek; Jeff Peppercorn; Jon Tilburt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Personalizing the decision of dabigatran versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation: A secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulation therapY (RE-LY) trial.

Authors:  Samuel W Reinhardt; Nihar R Desai; Yuanyuan Tang; Philip G Jones; Jeremy Ader; John A Spertus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.

Authors:  Janet Jull; Sascha Köpke; Maureen Smith; Meg Carley; Jeanette Finderup; Anne C Rahn; Laura Boland; Sandra Dunn; Andrew A Dwyer; Jürgen Kasper; Simone Maria Kienlin; France Légaré; Krystina B Lewis; Anne Lyddiatt; Claudia Rutherford; Junqiang Zhao; Tamara Rader; Ian D Graham; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-08

4.  Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  M Pilar Ingle; William Lammons; Rebecca Guigli; Vinay Kini; Daniel D Matlock; Elinor Brereton; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.