Literature DB >> 25634631

Intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale.

Margaret L Campbell1, Thomas N Templin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale(©) is an innovative solution to assessment when a dyspnea report cannot be elicited. The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale has acceptable reliability and validity psychometrics. AIM: To identify distress-intensity cut-points of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale.
DESIGN: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted with inpatients stratified by four levels of respiratory distress-none, mild, moderate, or severe. Patients provided three self-report measures of dyspnea: dichotomous (yes/no); a ranking of none, mild, moderate, or severe; and a numerical rating scale. Respiratory distress was assessed using the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale instrument. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 136 adult inpatients, mean age 61.8 years (standard deviation = 13.18 years), 89.7% African American, and 56.6% female, who were recruited from an urban, tertiary care hospital in the Midwest of the United States.
RESULTS: In all, 47% (n = 64) self-reported dyspnea (yes/no). Ranking was distributed as follows: none = 36, mild = 35, moderate = 40, and severe = 25. Numerical rating scale scores ranged from 0 to 10, mean = 4.99 (standard deviation = 2.9). Respiratory Distress Observation Scale scores ranged from 0 to 7, median (interquartile range) = 2 (1-3). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis-determined Respiratory Distress Observation Scale score of 0-2 suggests little or no respiratory distress; score ≥3 signified moderate to severe distress.
CONCLUSION: A Respiratory Distress Observation Scale score ≥3 signifies a patient's need for palliation of respiratory distress. An end-point for identifying responsiveness to treatment, in other words, respiratory comfort, is Respiratory Distress Observation Scale <3. Because patients with imminent respiratory failure, as typified by dying patients, were not represented yielding lower than expected Respiratory Distress Observation Scale scores, further substantiation is needed to determine moderate or severe cut-points.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dyspnea; psychometrics; respiratory insufficiency; symptom assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25634631      PMCID: PMC4429859          DOI: 10.1177/0269216314564238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  19 in total

1.  Neural substrates for the perception of acutely induced dyspnea.

Authors:  C Peiffer; J B Poline; L Thivard; M Aubier; Y Samson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).

Authors:  E W Ely; R Margolin; J Francis; L May; B Truman; R Dittus; T Speroff; S Gautam; G R Bernard; S K Inouye
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breathlessness in humans activates insular cortex.

Authors:  R B Banzett; H E Mulnier; K Murphy; S D Rosen; R J Wise; L Adams
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Death rattle is not associated with patient respiratory distress: is pharmacologic treatment indicated?

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell; Hossein N Yarandi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Fear and pulmonary stress behaviors to an asphyxial threat across cognitive states.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Brian R Clarridge; Virginia Casey; Lisa C Welch; Terrie Wetle; Renee Shield; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Psychometric testing of a respiratory distress observation scale.

Authors:  Margaret L Campbell
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  The unpleasantness of perceived dyspnea is processed in the anterior insula and amygdala.

Authors:  Andreas von Leupoldt; Tobias Sommer; Sarah Kegat; Hans Jörg Baumann; Hans Klose; Bernhard Dahme; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dyspnea: Don't Just Look, Ask!

Authors:  Robert B Banzett; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Translation, reliability, and validity of Japanese version of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale.

Authors:  Hideaki Sakuramoto; Chie Hatozaki; Takeshi Unoki; Gen Aikawa; Shunsuke Kobayashi; Saiko Okamoto; Shinichi Shimomura; Ayako Kawasaki; Miwako Fukui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Two Methods of Pressure Support Adjustment on Respiratory Distress in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation Admitted to Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Pooneh Barati; Somayeh Ghafari; Mahmood Saghaei
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-09

4.  Improving comfort in people with dementia and pneumonia: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Tessa van der Maaden; Henrica C W de Vet; Wilco P Achterberg; Froukje Boersma; Jos M G A Schols; David R Mehr; Francisca Galindo-Garre; Cees M P M Hertogh; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Jenny T van der Steen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Restrictive Ventilatory Patterns in Residents of Continuing Care Retirement Communities.

Authors:  Christine R Kovach; Murad H Taani; Crystal-Rae Evans; Sheryl Kelber; Irwin Margolis
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 1.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.